pielock373
Well-Known Member
I wish they would have offered different starship registrations, I would have loved to get the MR Starship Exeter. That would have been a real hoot. :love Can't wait for part three of the show.....
He talked about the scuff in the paint but said nothing about the crack, that bothers me more then the scuff. I would send that one back. Now I don't mean to alarm people but when the communicators came out mine came with problems and needed to be returned, they sent me another unit which had obviously been used returned and then sent to me all beaten up. I called and bitched that they would send me a used unit for replacement and sent that one back. The third communicator took close to 6 months to get to me. When I see enterprises going back to MR I can't help but have flashbacks about my communicator experience. :confused I sure hope my starship comes through unscaved :confused
Steve P
[/b]
I may be trying to pick one up on evelbay the damaged ones.
they do not check the motors or lights since the transformers and stand are not included.
could someone on this board who had one delivered post the output on the power supply and send me a pix of the plug?is this a simple 12V system RCA jack?
Thanks
MSL
[/b]
So incoming inspection checklist based on what we have seen so far.
Thank god no failed motors have been reported yet, that is the only one on the list that has not been seen yet.
1. Lights all work?
2. Motors work, assess noise level?
3. Cracks on dorsal of neck?
4. Grids acceptable?
5. Paint scuffs acceptable?
6. Buckled grills on warp engines?
7. Glue blobs?
8. Warp pylon gaps at hull? I think every single one has this actually.
9. Light leaks around beacon, strobes, nav lights, dorsal lights?
Your mileage clearly may vary. Decide what is a show stopper ahead of time and have your plan.
And hopefully this list does not grow.
[/b]
The grids belong there in this scale I believe. They should be rather subtle on the bottom, and less subtle on the top.
But SUBTLE is the operative word.
I thought they did good on the one I had to send back....
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e.jpg
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e1.jpg
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e12.jpg
Do the pics above look too much to anyone who believes grids should be on this scale model?
I was happy with those grids damn it.
But most other pics I have seen of what others are getting really bums me out because my expectations were of what I had already.
Argh.
[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(CessnaDriver @ Jan 26 2007, 03:54 PM) [snapback]1405493[/snapback]
The grids belong there in this scale I believe. They should be rather subtle on the bottom, and less subtle on the top.
But SUBTLE is the operative word.
I thought they did good on the one I had to send back....
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e.jpg
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e1.jpg
http://home.san.rr.com/maxxq/e12.jpg
Do the pics above look too much to anyone who believes grids should be on this scale model?
I was happy with those grids damn it.
But most other pics I have seen of what others are getting really bums me out because my expectations were of what I had already.
Argh.
[/b]
Hi John
I didn't mean to sound like I was jumping down your throte, my apologies. I am just very concerned for all of us about these little problems that people a getting with the enterprises. Its a lot of money to spend to see paint rubbed off, lights not working, pieces buckled and cracks that are so obvious that it shouldn't have left the factory. I am just holding my breath until I see my model.
[/b]
The dorsal seam crack is the most extreme I've seen so far and almost all of had a gap where the nacelle pylons connect to the secondary hull when viewed from above and the where the impulse deck meets the primary hull.
[/b]
It's all good. We all love the same thing; the TOS E.![]()
[/b]