Klingon Disruptor from Diamond Select Toys in 2011

[antigravity]

It looks like Diamond Select Toys has revealed their next Trek Tek prop. I just found this link to a photo of the Klingon disruptor shown at Toy Fair today. While not my first choice, the quality looks to be as solid as previous DST items. The prototype is accompanied by a refreshingly realistic placard that reads "In stores 2011."

http://www.cooltoyreview.com/TF2010/DST/image18.asp

Still pulling for a Star Trek III phaser though (and communicator, and cool pop-up tricorder).

 

[phase pistol]

"Shipping a few months after our final delayed deadline." :lol

Ah, they all are fantastic when they finally do come out, so I say take all the time you need... better good than on time.

Not a huge fan of the Klingons, but that looks to be a nice piece. Looking forward to DST getting back on track with the Federation tech.

But hey, a 16-inch "Starship Legends" Klingon Battle Cruiser from TOS would be OK if, you know, they sort of wanted to drop one. :rolleyes

k

 

[antigravity]

But hey, a 16-inch "Starship Legends" Klingon Battle Cruiser from TOS would be OK if, you know, they sort of wanted to drop one. :rolleyes

I can get you a Bird of Prey, if that helps.

http://www.cooltoyreview.com/TF2010/DST/image27.asp

 

[yt]

Wow $45 for the disruptor.

 

[phase pistol]

Well at least the BOP has got landing gear. We haven't seen that before. :lol

Not a fan of the BOP but we all know I'll buy one anyway... I wonder how accurate to Star Trek III it will be. That ship has been so inconsistently shown over the years it's not funny...

k

 

[TOSPHASER]

I was hoping for a OS Disruptor............I will not be picking up either of them!

 

[phase pistol]

They got the Enterprise-B and Excelsior in the works too. But we knew that.

 

[Contec]

Hmmmm I wonder what that tiny sign with a Camera means ? :lol

 

[MooCriket]

Hmmmm I wonder what that tiny sign with a Camera means ? :lol

:lolGood catch:thumbsup

 

[SSgt Burton]

It means "This is not a camera". :confused

(crawls under desk)


I'll buy one when it comes out... but I won't be holding my breath on the 2011 release date.


Kevin

 

[Mercury]

I will definitely be grabbing one, if and when they are actually released.:lol

 

[-E-]

I'm not a fan of the Klingon disruptor, either. I'll buy one, but I won't be anticipating it. The price looks a bit high, too. Especially since it's not a "two for one" like the Federations phasers that have the removable P1's. Maybe we'll get a Klingon comm out of this as well or a "P1" as seen in The Voyage Home.

I do, however, like that BOP. Having the landing gear is a nice touch, too. I hope the wings are able to move up and down as well.

 

[SSgt Burton]

Err... hope they get the bussard collectors right before it goes into production. :unsure

Kevin

 

[phase pistol]

I guess that must be an Excelsior that they put 1701-B decals on for the show. They will probably know the difference, they're pretty sharp over there.

EDIT: Hey wait you're right, they got the extra outboard impulse engine decks right, but the warp nacelles are the same. It's some kind of Enter-Celsior mashup. :confused

 

[Nicksdad]

Yuk, poor choice for a blaster. Should have gone TOS

 

[WinstonWolf359]

THIS is the prop they get into TNG with?!?

Ho hum. I'm sure it'll be cool, but I have ZERO interest in a non-TOS Klingon disrupter.

I'd rather see them complete the Star Fleet motion picture-era with the TMP and TWOK communicators before making this odd leap into alien role play.

 

[Lancer]

I prefer the clean excelsior look. I didn't like the bits they added for the B

 

[tim]

EDIT: Hey wait you're right, they got the extra outboard impulse engine decks right, but the warp nacelles are the same. It's some kind of Enter-Celsior mashup. :confused

I'm betting the plugged Excelsior nacelles onto an Enterprise-B hull. As I recall, the old Enterprise-A had removable nacelles for shipping and I'm betting this ship is the same. So maybe proper nacelles are in the works?

 

[SSgt Burton]

Thing is the rear of the nacelles have the correct Enterprise-B vertical fins, where as the Excelsior does not have them. :unsure


Kevin

 

[rkpetersen]

I prefer the clean excelsior look. I didn't like the bits they added for the B

Agreed re the outboard impulse engines, but the Bussard collectors are more interesting on the B. So they managed to include the least attractive features of both craft for this prototype. :unsure