Simple, money. If they kept it around just for the sake of keeping it around it's costing them money even if they own the building because they'd still have to pay property taxes on it. And they'd have to spend some money on basic upkeep in order to keep it from crumbling down because of a lack of maintenance. They'd have to pay for security as well in order to keep people from breaking in and vandalizing and/or squatting in it.Video killed the radio star....but in this case.....CGI.....
Its really sad to see something so iconic, used to make so many iconic films, now have to be sold like this.
Besides movies not really using models like these anymore, but what is the reason to now sell it all? and not keep for memory sake?
You almost wish some big billionaire movie fan would just come and buy it all, but keep it all intact as is, for the memories, if possible.
Well, I know....but, its Hollywood. They can afford to pay an already stupidly rich actor 50+ million dollars, but can't spend a fraction of that to save the place that basically got them a lot of that money in the first place, through the effects that help draw people to see a film.Simple, money. If they kept it around just for the sake of keeping it around it's costing them money even if they own the building because they'd still have to pay property taxes on it. And they'd have to spend some money on basic upkeep in order to keep it from crumbling down because of a lack of maintenance. They'd have to pay for security as well in order to keep people from breaking in and vandalizing and/or squatting in it.
But paying a $50 million for an actor is a part of doing business and it has the potential to make them money at the box office because their movie stars so and so and a big name can draw in audiences. But an unused building does nothing but cost them money, there's no return on their investment. Their only choices are to either empty it and convert it for some other use, clear it out so it can be rented/leased out for someone else to use for whatever, or just sell it. Bottom line, companies don't stay in business by wasting money, which is exactly what keeping an old building around that does nothing for their bottom line just for the sake of nostalgia.Well, I know....but, its Hollywood. They can afford to pay an already stupidly rich actor 50+ million dollars, but can't spend a fraction of that to save the place that basically got them a lot of that money in the first place, through the effects that help draw people to see a film.
Guess I'm the nostalgic type.
I absolutely hated to see the water park, Wet N Wild, close and torn down in Orlando, as it was one of the first water parks ever built.
But Universal bought it, built a bigger better one, and torn that one down.
I hated to see that, all in the name of money.
Like Hollywood Studios trying to force physical media out now, Hollywood forced out models instead of using it in conjunction with CG. Now, there’s so few directors who use model effects while everyone else uses CG (and in a lot of cases, using CG more than actually having a good plot for their film).Video killed the radio star....but in this case.....CGI.....
Its really sad to see something so iconic, used to make so many iconic films, now have to be sold like this.
Besides movies not really using models like these anymore, but what is the reason to now sell it all? and not keep for memory sake?
You almost wish some big billionaire movie fan would just come and buy it all, but keep it all intact as is, for the memories, if possible.
I know......I know.........But paying a $50 million for an actor is a part of doing business and it has the potential to make them money at the box office because their movie stars so and so and a big name can draw in audiences. But an unused building does nothing but cost them money, there's no return on their investment. Their only choices are to either empty it and convert it for some other use, clear it out so it can be rented/leased out for someone else to use for whatever, or just sell it. Bottom line, companies don't stay in business by wasting money, which is exactly what keeping an old building around that does nothing for their bottom line just for the sake of nostalgia.
Interesting...wouldn't have known that. I guess if a person is recasting, they surely will try and push themselves into "knowing" people at the the expense of others hard work.Did anyone catch the fact that the video is from the YouTube channel of a known recaster? One who was banned from theRPF. I mean it was cool to see the model shop and all, but I wonder what kinds of connections this guy has to gain such access?
There will come the day when everything will follow suit, and we'll all exist "online" due to the same reasons.Simple, money. If they kept it around just for the sake of keeping it around it's costing them money even if they own the building because they'd still have to pay property taxes on it. And they'd have to spend some money on basic upkeep in order to keep it from crumbling down because of a lack of maintenance. They'd have to pay for security as well in order to keep people from breaking in and vandalizing and/or squatting in it.