Halliwax's weird V3 theory

Huh, I thought the bottom two close rings WERE there on the V2, just not as "in-your-face" and obvious.

Guess I need to look at some reference again, been awhile!

EDIT: yeah, that gap above the two bottom rings is there, so I'd say they're from the same source mold.
 
Hmm, yea after posting that yesterday i doubted it again, these details are so small!
 
So this might be heresy, but while working on my V3 I came up with this idea for how it may have been constructed... There may be an inner 'pipe' that holds the saber together which would mean if the blade fell out, as seen in the footage, the emitter may not fall off. I have no idea if any information conflicts with this, but figured I may as well pitch in my theory.
V3 Assembly.png


Or perhaps during the refurbishment, they took out the whole thing and used some spare 5/16 stock and just put it in as a placeholder, and that blade and tang became the one from this image:
saberblade.png


Also! I had another thought, although it's more about the V2 - the Jedi training remote has an awfully similar construction... There's that steel round stock holding the remote up and linking it to a motor (all be it with a controller) but I wonder if that motor may be the same type used in the V2? Sure looks like it might fit, and if these prop guys were grabbing whatever was around them, they might have had a few of those lying around?
DSC_5195.JPG

(Credit to RPF user Rymo for this image, I cropped it down a bit to focus on the box, as its the clearest image of the motor box I could find.
 
I want to thank Halliwax for letting me bounce ideas off him - something came up while I was inspecting V3 images and comparing them to casts (the thread on the wooden buck). The photos I'm using are from that g drive link shared in the "working on a V3" thread, and some other publicly available things, so let me know if I have to take them down or anything. I don't know who took them.

The only (mostly) definitive match for the V3 is here. I say V3 as the present day construction at least, and it's existence before that.
V3Rehearsal.jpg


I say this because all the metal stunts were basically the same. The weird things done to each are what sets them a part. On today's V3 for example that would be a lack of nipple, two exact set screw/holes, rough surface emitter, etc. They're some of the only discerning details and they weren't even around back then. We can actually see these above. So we can date the V3's current construction to pick-ups at the end of Jedi.

After searching V3 shots for shapes that link it to the wooden buck (just for confirmation and maybe to help explain how it was made, like we've been arguing about over there) I found vertical lines in the lower black neck. Like, the wood grain lines you can see on the buck itself. Cool, so I looked closer.... and something hit me. The paint job matches, but the clean-up and finishing work does not. I know the paint may be so recent that it's the 1993 paint job, but it got me thinking about people cleaning up hilts.

Hear me out - we keep finding that the simpler answers turn out to be true, or that the answer was staring us in the face the whole time. The Barbican, even though it looked like touring sabers, was original and it even had the MPP clamp, bubbles and T track right in front of us. The ROTJ Vader saber was a basterdized Graflex stunt. The V2 was a basterdized Obi Wan stunt, not too many multiples floating around and Lucasfilm still has a lot more **** than I had realized.

The V3 is supposed to be another heavily used prop that they kept. Where are the other emitter set-screw holes if the big 5mm grub screw was added later to hold it together as a "hilt"? Or, on the contrary, where is that big 5mm grub screw in shots from the throne room and Endor.. or even practice? It's been bugging me and I know some of you as well. We've already argued about it on here. Something isn't adding up. So I looked closer at the V3, pulling back and trying to literally look at it like I'd never seen it before. Plainly, objectively observing it. The first noticeable trait is the emitter. We thought it was tape, it's metal flashing, and it's very noticeable.

What model maker would file the body and pommel smooth and leave the emitter the way it was. Especially the neck, why finish most of it and leave something an inch away unfinished?
04 3866761103_f2b438862e_o.jpg

31 saberwiki_swcreators_4lukesaber2.jpg
43 LukeV3a.jpg


Also, we don't really notice this rough flashing in old shots. I know there's gaffer tape in a lot of them, but the old Alec shots don't show a mangled emitter (when this was possibly cleaned for use). So if it was rough in ANH, how about ESB? ROTJ? Would someone on SW, with the behavior that we see, specifically not clean a whole hilt? I'm not so sure. I feel like we'd see it.. especially if we can see layers of gaffer tape, costume pieces and screw holes.

IMG_0300.jpg


The plain answer to me is that this is not a matching set. I believe the current emitter was cut off another cast and installed on this clean one. There is cut damage on one side and not the other.
V3neck.jpg


They all have seam lines, they all start out this way. I think the emitter was a quick repair job, and then the foil tape and paint were for the 1993 exhibit

I'm not sure why the original hilt would have been incomplete. Maybe this was the death saber that had a raw machined emitter on a cast metal body (the two silver colors we see), and after the fx failed, later on, they needed to complete the hilt....maybe they broke the first emitter and had to repair it without access to a machine shop.....maybe this was a failed attempt at fx and was cobbled together when they needed a second hilt.

I'm not wholly convinced we know which exact pull is used for fighting in the throne room, and which pull is used for practice backstage. The broken emitter thing might make it the V3. The metal pulls all have different dings and proportions. This gets into territory that I have no clues for. I'd love to talk about it though!
 
Last edited:
Didn't the emitter break off in that scene when Luke goes berserk on Vader, in Jedi?

I don't remember exactly, but I s'pose this new emitter could've replaced that one...

And yes, it definitely looks like flashing around the emitter from when it was cast.
 
Guys I keep seeing the term “wood grain” used

Are you referring to the vertical lines in the hilt? If so that’s not the actual grain of the wood that’s the marks let behind from the “roughing blade” tool used for forming the wood piece

You can see it here starting at 3:00


You can see even the wood buck was rushed, where they used a finish file, a former, and roughing blade/edge
 
Didn't the emitter break off in that scene when Luke goes berserk on Vader, in Jedi?

I don't remember exactly, but I s'pose this new emitter could've replaced that one...

And yes, it definitely looks like flashing around the emitter from when it was cast.

I don’t think it actually broke Dann, I think the 3mm set screw in the windvane let it slip out
 
Yeah, I'm not seeing wood grain in the black neck portion. Isn't this part of the reason why the buck was painted? To mask the grain, and to seal the pores?

Danny: Ahhh, I gotcha. Figures I'd remember that wrong!
 
Yeah, I'm not seeing wood grain in the black neck portion. Isn't this part of the reason why the buck was painted? To mask the grain, and to seal the pores?

Danny: Ahhh, I gotcha. Figures I'd remember that wrong!

I guess they painted it to seal it, but they didn’t take the time to sand the rest of the hilt you can see the roughing edge marks pretty good

I love how rushed this thing is, it’s whole life it was a rush job
 
I actually see lines on the original buck going the other direction also, pommel to emitter. It's those I see on the lower neck. I do also see the roughing lines or rings on the buck and castings (thank you!)
 
So the other night I had a really dumb thought that the wood buck might be the death saber because of the cut emitter as discussed in the other thread and the fact it was used in a gag where it drops (then I went to sleep realizing how stupid that sounds), but it got me thinking about the death saber a lot.

Now, I think you're onto something. Looking at Vadermania's cast from the start of this thread, I agree cleaning up the emitter would easily have been done with the rest of the saber.

As the brass colored windvane shows up really well in ESB from the Skywalker Legacy video on the previous page - I personally think the windvane paint matches the death saber (I do wish we had better footage of it). So to me, the death saber is at least the one used in rehearsal. You can also make out what looks like paint caught in a seam line in the rehearsal pic, which could make it the V3. I feel the nipple on the death saber is also a pretty close match for the nipple we see in the throne room/Endor sequence. The only thing I cant figure out is where the black on the emitter comes from in ESB, which isn't in ANH, but then seems to be almost gone when we get to the throne room.

V3 Compilation.png


With the crazy beating in stunts it took (loosing blades and the wood chopping scene) I can definitely imagine the emitter flying off or getting damaged, then replaced by spares they had lying around. Assuming it made it through the throne room and other stunts before finally breaking, it wouldn't need to be be rigged up to take a blade anymore and was then just replaced with an ANH leftover for the archives. Or perhaps damaging emitters was a common problem after ESB so they kept a few on hand?

Also I think I can see the lines you're talking about on the neck:
V3 Wood Lines.png

Certainly looks like the grain to me!
 
So the other night I had a really dumb thought that the wood buck might be the death saber because of the cut emitter as discussed in the other thread and the fact it was used in a gag where it drops (then I went to sleep realizing how stupid that sounds), but it got me thinking about the death saber a lot.

Now, I think you're onto something. Looking at Vadermania's cast from the start of this thread, I agree cleaning up the emitter would easily have been done with the rest of the saber.

As the brass colored windvane shows up really well in ESB from the Skywalker Legacy video on the previous page - I personally think the windvane paint matches the death saber (I do wish we had better footage of it). So to me, the death saber is at least the one used in rehearsal. You can also make out what looks like paint caught in a seam line in the rehearsal pic, which could make it the V3. I feel the nipple on the death saber is also a pretty close match for the nipple we see in the throne room/Endor sequence. The only thing I cant figure out is where the black on the emitter comes from in ESB, which isn't in ANH, but then seems to be almost gone when we get to the throne room.

View attachment 1285809

With the crazy beating in stunts it took (loosing blades and the wood chopping scene) I can definitely imagine the emitter flying off or getting damaged, then replaced by spares they had lying around. Assuming it made it through the throne room and other stunts before finally breaking, it wouldn't need to be be rigged up to take a blade anymore and was then just replaced with an ANH leftover for the archives. Or perhaps damaging emitters was a common problem after ESB so they kept a few on hand?

Also I think I can see the lines you're talking about on the neck:
View attachment 1285812
Certainly looks like the grain to me!

There’s black still left on the emitter in rotj, black and grey

Now the death sabers emitter doesn’t look like the v3 to me? :(
 
Didn't the emitter break off in that scene when Luke goes berserk on Vader, in Jedi?
I believe not. I did comparative measures in frame by frame steps & as best as I can tell it stays put. It's ****** quality footage though. That's on another thread but I can't remember which just now.
 
Halliwax...great thread!! i've read through this but its been a while. I came across this pic in my 1983 ROTJ book. I'm sure the consensus will be that its the v2, if it is then why is the emitter so wide and the cone knob and mystery chunk aren't on the ride side, nor is the D ring in the proper location according to every v2 i've seen. This, to me is a head scratcher but i'd appreciate your insight. thanks
1588787608464.png
1588787587285.png
 
1) the pommel can rotate. It's fixed by a set screw in a flange, so anywhere it turns it won't come out. I forget where that came up (which page of the V2 thread) So the mystery chunk being opposite the D ring looks accurate. The clamp can also rotate, being a band clamp just wrapped around the body, so it's possible it got shifted and ended up on the cone knob side of the body.

2) HOWEVER I agree that the emitter doesn't look right. I noticed this too on film.
Screen Shot 2020-05-05 at 1.33.36 AM.png

The V2's emitter does not have such a wide first flange
(center is the V2)
rotjsaber-vi.jpg


Maybe it chipped/broke and they milled down the rim of the V2? Maybe this is a different emitter?
 
Back
Top