As much as I love the first 25 or so books of King's, GOT reminds me of how the Dark Tower series fell apart after the first 4 books.View attachment 1017317
I find it fun when writers comment on other media they love... and I would SO be there for King Tyrion, first of his name...
Doesn't it just suck to invest years of your life loving characters and stories only to have the creators just stop caring about the fans and delivering crap content? The beginning starts off strong and leaves so much potential for the conclusion only to have it fall flat in the end.
Now GOT fans know how many Star Wars fans feel. Sucks doesn't it?
I have no investment whatsoever in GOT.
Doesn't it just suck to invest years of your life loving characters and stories only to have the creators just stop caring about the fans and delivering crap content? The beginning starts off strong and leaves so much potential for the conclusion only to have it fall flat in the end.
Now GOT fans know how many Star Wars fans feel. Sucks doesn't it?
Just to change the subject a tad here, it just boggles my mind how any of these (fictional and real) patriarchal-royal bloodline monarchies ever seem to get anywhere. What kind of idiotic society would give a child absolute power over the entire civilized world just because of their "royal" blood? Just makes no sense to me. Yet many societies throughout history have operated this way. How can anyone be that stupid? I might could understand it back in the day when maybe people thought their rulers were gods, still stupid, but I get it. But after that, what did people really think blood had to do with anything regarding ruling?
Cersei only gets the throne after both her barely teenage sons are dead. Not that she is a great Queen, but why not just give it to her in the first place? Did anyone really think Goffrey would be anything but a megalomaniac? At least Tomlin seemed like a decent human being, but why not just give it to the adult to begin with. Did people really think letting a child rule was a good thing?
I also realize that women were pretty much treated like **** throughout history, but just having a dick is better credentials than age and wisdom?
Some of you History buffs help me out here.
Just to change the subject a tad here, it just boggles my mind how any of these (fictional and real) patriarchal-royal bloodline monarchies ever seem to get anywhere. What kind of idiotic society would give a child absolute power over the entire civilized world just because of their "royal" blood? Just makes no sense to me. Yet many societies throughout history have operated this way. How can anyone be that stupid? I might could understand it back in the day when maybe people thought their rulers were gods, still stupid, but I get it. But after that, what did people really think blood had to do with anything regarding ruling?
Cersei only gets the throne after both her barely teenage sons are dead. Not that she is a great Queen, but why not just give it to her in the first place? Did anyone really think Goffrey would be anything but a megalomaniac? At least Tomlin seemed like a decent human being, but why not just give it to the adult to begin with. Did people really think letting a child rule was a good thing?
I also realize that women were pretty much treated like **** throughout history, but just having a dick is better credentials than age and wisdom?
Some of you History buffs help me out here.
Not meant to be trolling. Just an observation about the failure of content creators to deliver to fans and not really caring about it either. I empathize with those who are disappointed, that's all.
So, back on topic, I keep hearing this next episode is supposed to feature a truly epic battle. Even thought I absolutely hate what they're doing with Daenerys' character, I'm wondering what will happen to her. How will she react when she finds out Varys wants to betray her? Will Tyrion tell her or will she find out for herself? I really hope they don't turn her into the "mad queen". We already have one of those.
Just to change the subject a tad here, it just boggles my mind how any of these (fictional and real) patriarchal-royal bloodline monarchies ever seem to get anywhere. What kind of idiotic society would give a child absolute power over the entire civilized world just because of their "royal" blood? Just makes no sense to me. Yet many societies throughout history have operated this way. How can anyone be that stupid? I might could understand it back in the day when maybe people thought their rulers were gods, still stupid, but I get it. But after that, what did people really think blood had to do with anything regarding ruling?
Cersei only gets the throne after both her barely teenage sons are dead. Not that she is a great Queen, but why not just give it to her in the first place? Did anyone really think Goffrey would be anything but a megalomaniac? At least Tomlin seemed like a decent human being, but why not just give it to the adult to begin with. Did people really think letting a child rule was a good thing?
I also realize that women were pretty much treated like **** throughout history, but just having a dick is better credentials than age and wisdom?
Some of you History buffs help me out here.
I'm guessing you, like myself, were born and raised in the good ol' USA.Just to change the subject a tad here, it just boggles my mind how any of these (fictional and real) patriarchal-royal bloodline monarchies ever seem to get anywhere. What kind of idiotic society would give a child absolute power over the entire civilized world just because of their "royal" blood? Just makes no sense to me. Yet many societies throughout history have operated this way. How can anyone be that stupid? I might could understand it back in the day when maybe people thought their rulers were gods, still stupid, but I get it. But after that, what did people really think blood had to do with anything regarding ruling?
Cersei only gets the throne after both her barely teenage sons are dead. Not that she is a great Queen, but why not just give it to her in the first place? Did anyone really think Goffrey would be anything but a megalomaniac? At least Tomlin seemed like a decent human being, but why not just give it to the adult to begin with. Did people really think letting a child rule was a good thing?
I also realize that women were pretty much treated like **** throughout history, but just having a dick is better credentials than age and wisdom?
Some of you History buffs help me out here.