Dredd (Post-release)

They usually estimate weekend results based on the first box office numbers that come in. I loved the movie but I didn't expect it to do well. Unfortunately the casual movie goer is going to associate this with the Stallone version and Dredd just doesn't have the same mass appeal as Batman, The Avengers, or any other Marvel movie. It's a shame because he is an awesome character!
I don't think the casual movie goer associates this with Stallone at all. Yeah, there are some that probably have some vague memory of the Stallone flick - but, I think most "casual movie goers" don't remember the original Judge Dredd movie that came out 17 years ago even if it was the 5th best movie of that year (let's face it, if it were better received we would've had sequels).

I just got back from Dredd 3D and I have mixed feelings about it. It really felt like a b-movie action flick (I'm not totally sure "b-movie" is the term I'm looking for here. I'm thinking movies like Carpenter's Assault on Precinct 13 and The Crow, even)... not necessarily a bad thing. But, something mainstream casual movie goers tend to avoid.

The local paper here in Detroit panned the movie (not sure if it was written by a local or if they just ran a syndicated review), but I've seen a lot of advertising for it. I thought it was a shoo-in just based on the amount of commercials I've seen - I really don't recall seeing much at all for the movies that made more bank than Dredd.

Dredd seemed to be pretty much exclusively 3D as well. There was only one or two showings of a 2D version at the theaters I checked... that may've hurt it as well.

I do think the movie has great potential to have a cult following... but, I'm not sure if it's something I'm eager to see again soon. I'm sure it might be worth a Blu Ray purchase or rental when that time comes.
 
...and it was the perfect example based on my knowledge of the character of what a Dredd film should be.

I enjoyed the often over the top violence, the gore and the movie for what it was. Hard to believe Bones McCoy and Eomer are Judge Dredd.
 
Just came back from the movie and thought it was freaking bad ass. Loved the uniform and loved the lawgiver; I thought it fit in rather well with the world they created. I also thought Anderson was a nice refreshing change to your typical tough girl action star. Looking forward to any sequel they might make!
 
Came back from my 3rd viewing, this time in 3D and it still kicks ass!

Not really a spoiler...Okay, I've followed the comic since the late 70s, and I'm pretty sure ALL Judges get issued with a Lawgiver. Anyone knows why Alvarez wasn't packing a sidearm and only fielding a Shotty? Budget constraint's? Your thoughts?
 
Came back from my 3rd viewing, this time in 3D and it still kicks ass!

Not really a spoiler...Okay, I've followed the comic since the late 70s, and I'm pretty sure ALL Judges get issued with a Lawgiver. Anyone knows why Alvarez wasn't packing a sidearm and only fielding a Shotty? Budget constraint's? Your thoughts?

My guess is that the shotgun was a replacement for his lawgiver. Like a shotgun Lawgiver with it being able to fire different loads. You can tell it had the DNA encoding because no one took it and chances are there was still lots of ammo left.

I think Dredd is going to be one of those movies that's only going to pick up momentum after those who saw it opening weekend pass on to their friends how awesome it is and then they go see it and do the same thing. Either that or it will develop a following on video.

I can't believe that some stupid love story revolving around Clint Eastwood and baseball is beating it.
 
My take on it is...
When the first dirty judge met up with Dredd, didn't he say something to the effect that he was with an assault squad. I would imagine it'd be similar to a SWAT team with the varied weapons. That's my guess anyways, not complaining though, was nice to see a shorty done up Judge's style. :cool
 
Dredd seemed to be pretty much exclusively 3D as well. There was only one or two showings of a 2D version at the theaters I checked... that may've hurt it as well.

That is the theaters cashing in. I noticed the same thing about the new Resident Evil movie.

Sent from my Etch-A-Sketch
 
Dredds box office stateside has been a huge disappointment and its difficult to understand why? When something like the fifth Resident Evil can pull in the big bucks with a very similar audience profile,though it has to be noted even this was a "disappointment" compared to the others and its doing better worldwide.
Is it that nobody really remembers Dredd now, except us aging fanboys? Is it that the violence is just too strong? I'm at a loss to explain why its done so weakly in the UK and the US. It seems to be being almost totally ignored, despite really, really positive reviews.
If it doesn't make more money then Stallones version (which I had the misfortune to watch for only the second time when it was on the TV last night) is going to kick its ass and that is the worst miscarriage of Justice I've ever witnessed!
I've no doubt that it will be become a cult hit over time but I'd really like to understand why it is that this film is doing so badly.
 
Came back from my 3rd viewing, this time in 3D and it still kicks ass!

Not really a spoiler...Okay, I've followed the comic since the late 70s, and I'm pretty sure ALL Judges get issued with a Lawgiver. Anyone knows why Alvarez wasn't packing a sidearm and only fielding a Shotty? Budget constraint's? Your thoughts?
In the comics Judges were also occasionally issued with an an all purpose assault rifle type weapon called the "Lawrod."

Lawrod
The lawrod rifle was the standard rifle carried by all street judges in a holster on the side of their lawmaster bikes. It became obsolete and was replaced with the Widowmaker in 2114.

Widowmaker
The Widowmaker 2000 is a fully automatic shotgun used by street judges. It was introduced in 2114 to replace the obsolete lawrod rifle. It was introduced to the comic strip in the story "Judgement Day".
 
Last edited:
Dredds box office stateside has been a huge disappointment and its difficult to understand why? When something like the fifth Resident Evil can pull in the big bucks with a very similar audience profile,though it has to be noted even this was a "disappointment" compared to the others and its doing better worldwide.
Is it that nobody really remembers Dredd now, except us aging fanboys? Is it that the violence is just too strong? I'm at a loss to explain why its done so weakly in the UK and the US. It seems to be being almost totally ignored, despite really, really positive reviews.
If it doesn't make more money then Stallones version (which I had the misfortune to watch for only the second time when it was on the TV last night) is going to kick its ass and that is the worst miscarriage of Justice I've ever witnessed!
I've no doubt that it will be become a cult hit over time but I'd really like to understand why it is that this film is doing so badly.
Dredd, despite his long history, is still a niche character and the film has no big name actor associated with it. The film is very good as an adaptation but look at the box office of other third tier comic characters such as the Spirit or the Phantom, and I'm not saying Dredd is third tier but from a greater public perception he is.
 
It's sad, hopefully this picks up steam. So many great visuals in this film. Definitely something we haven't seen before. I'll admit I had my doubts at first, but the reviews made me go all in on this one!

And Resident Evil doesn't even register on the radar for me. When I see those trailer's I don't pop onto the forum to diss it. Resident Evil films, they're not even worth my time.
 
Amazing film. I hope it picks up some steam here in the US, although my screening was a mostly empty theater
 
am I the only one who was totally disappointed with this film? I only read the last page of this thread due to me wanting to state my disapproval... I really really wanted to like it but there's no excuse for them to make such a worthless movie. I even built a big display with Dredds helmet and badges for the cinema after I watched it I kinda wanted to take my display down.(I'll post a link soon) As mentioned:http://www.therpf.com/f9/dredd-display-161660/


Dredd was portrayed very well however I didn't feel that he had the whole best and nastiest judge around type persona. People want to see iconic characters and to me he when those bad guys found out that it was judge Dredd they should've been scared to death!

My biggest problem with the film was that I watched an hour of them making they're way up a building only to kill a drug dealer! Really! a female drug dealer is going to be Dredds big foe?
 
Last edited:
I think the film can definitely make more money just from word of mouth but that's only if they keep it in theaters longer. Already there are only 4 showings a day at my local theater. Such a shame, I really wanna see a sequel. Loved it!
 
am I the only one who was totally disappointed with this film? I only read the last page of this thread due to me wanting to state my disapproval... I really really wanted to like it but there's no excuse for them to make such a worthless movie. I even built a big display with Dredds helmet and badges for the cinema after I watched it I kinda wanted to take my display down.(I'll post a link soon)

Dredd was portrayed very well however I didn't feel that he had the whole best and nastiest judge around type persona. People want to see iconic characters and to me he when those bad guys found out that it was judge Dredd they should've been scared to death!

My biggest problem with the film was that I watched an hour of them making they're way up a building only to kill a drug dealer! Really! a female drug dealer is going to be Dredds big foe?


Ah, see, that actually was an aspect I liked about the film.

The film made it VERY clear how dangerous this assignment was, and MaMa's efforts to kill Dredd (especially the minigun scene) show how ruthless she is. Moreover, Anderson's behavior made it clear that she recognizes they're really in deep s**t.

For Dredd, on the other hand, she's a common criminal in need of judgment. Ruthless she may be. Extreme, sure. But so what? Dredd's got a job to do and this woman doesn't faze him. To him, she's just another punk, even if she's taken over a mega high-rise, and is willing to basically blow entire floors apart just to kill one man.

So, to me, what you saw was the juxtaposition of real, genuine danger that's clear to the AUDIENCE, thanks to the degree of violence and Anderson's reactions to it (which validate the sense of heightened tension and risk), but at the end of the day, it's just a drug bust for Dredd.


That illustrates the world, I find. That's what makes it feel very very real. You have this world that, at any second, can (and occasionally does) slip into total anarchy. Women like MaMa run cities in Columbia. In Somalia, she'd be some pirate warlord. Or she'd be running a portion of Mexico. In this post-apocalyptic future, she's the ultimate danger: someone who thinks they can BECOME their own law. What she represents is a potential future where people live, terrorized by criminal warlords. And the only thing standing in their way are the Judges. All of that provides a context for the extreme measures the judges use. It's WHY they have this brutal, rigid authoritarian system.

And Dredd's right in the middle of it. You get the sense that, to him, this really IS just a day in the life. It's ALWAYS like this. Dredd's business-like approach to the whole thing again highlights how mad his world has gone, and he's the only one standing in the way.


Frankly, I LOVED this aspect. I was glad that it wasn't some doofy "You've saved Mega City-1 and the entire planet, Dredd! Well done! Now, kiss the girl" film. The danger came from the odds Dredd faced. The thrill of success from having beaten those odds and survived...only to realize that, tomorrow, he'll just be out there again, doing it like he always does.
 
OK, I just saw it! Went to a noon matinee, saw it in regular 2D but after seeing it kinda wished I had seen 3D as there are parts that would clearly look very cool. The downside to seeing it in 3D would be it's a dark film and in 3D may be too dark. The theater had 3 other people, I hear the box office has been disappointing. I think they did a terrible job marketing this movie, it's almost nonexistent.

Anyway, I really liked it. Wasn't sure if I was going to early int he movie but it engaged me slowly and had me pretty all in at the end. I kept watching it thinking "what does this remind me of?" and realized as I left the theater it's like the original RoboCop. It's very bleak and nihilistic and as mentioned, very violent and graphic. I am not a reader of the comics so my whole Dredd experience is framed around the Stallone film, which I actually liked when it came out. Karl Urban was practically channeling the Stallone performance most of the time but I was ok with that as I think what Stallone did was cool and since they stuck to it I assume comic accurate. And I liked both the villain Ma Ma (Can't recall where I have seen her before but will look her up in IMDB) and his rookie partner Anderson. I have to also give credit to the building Peachtree Towers as being a major character in the film. It creates a sufficiently closed off, claustrophobic environment that's effect for the story and filming economy. Being a prop fan I did like the Lawgivers in the original movie a bit better based on design but these were cool as well. I also thought the ending was terrific. It's short, only 1:36 running time and that is PERFECT for a film like this, bravo for not overindulging. The only mistep in that regard was the effects used for the Slo-Mo drug but that likely looks great in 3D.So I give it a solid recommend but just be aware the content is rough, bad stuff happens, and I applaud them for not sugar coating it and making too glossy, which I can see be the rub with the Stallone movie.
 
The screening I was in had less than 12 people, me and my 2 buddies included. I can see how it would get beat out by Nemo 3D or any other family film (Generally buying at least 2 tickets at a family movie). I'd have thought that Resident Evil would have dropped in it;s second week, though.

I'm going to see it again...have to help it break 50 mil Stateside.
 
Back
Top