Pirates of the Caribbean. Nuff said.
I'm honestly not seeing a difference in how Disney and LFL manages their property. They are in fact very similar.
Oh and what about a Sherlock not written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle? Or a Doctor Who not written by Sydney Newman? Or Trek not written by Gene Roddenberry?
These three examples show that a property does NOT die when the leading people move on or pass it on, rather it can flourish in the memory of what the original intents and spirit were behind the originals.
You are under the impression that this has not been underway for some time.it is the end of 2012. star wars movies have been shown to take 3 years to make. there will be no star wars movie released in 2015. it's bs. sorry
You are under the impression that this has not been underway for some time.
Cars 2 wasn't too bad for a sequel, imo. Definitely better than most of the other sequels out there.
TS3 was essentially retreading the same emotional ground that TS2 did better. And "not too bad for a sequel"? Really, is that as high as we're willing to set the bar?
Look, I know people seem to be generally excited about more SW, but I'm just of the opinion that more isn't better. I was fine letting the story rest at 6 (three of which were groundbreaking, rollercoaster fun, and three others which were arguably "better than most other sequels out there", no matter what whining and moaning we do as fans), and despite being a huge, lifelong fan since '77, would have been perfectly content if there had never been another film. Also, this:
Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that one possibility being considered is an Avengers-style movie universe with not only Lucas' planned final trio of films but offshoot movies focusing on individual characters
is just depressing. Within a day it's already starting to look like there is no overal story that is burning to be told here, just "how can we crank out more SW?". That's exaxctly the wrong way this needed to be approached, if it needed to be approached at all.
Yesterday was a sad day. The prequels might suck but the whole point of George Lucas having the companies was to control his creation. I thought yesterday's news was an April Fools joke. I'm sure Red Letter Media could put together tons of videos now with a young George Lucas completely contradicting his older self. I don't know why this purchase by Disney needed to happen.
I just don't get the doom and gloom...For YEARS people have been saying "what if someone besides George made a new star wars film?" Now we are actually going to get that, and the sky is falling.
...
Will it be a money grab? SURE it will, but can someone actually keep a straight face and try to make the argument that there was a time when Star Wars didn't do that? Lucas has been set on making money from the films from the day he asked for those merchandising rights in the original contract.
You nailed it. People saying they wanted someone else to direct - I don't recall anyone saying Lucas shouldn't be involved and if they did they are wrong - I especially always wanted to keep it with Lucas, as it is his child - but he works better as the idea man that others more skilled with writing and creating good characters and drama can then add on and play with. We have Empire Strikes Back as proof of that.First, they're all, and always HAVE been, wrong. So no contradiction there. Lucas is SW; it's his sandbox.
Second, yes, it's a business, but whatever feelings one might have about the movies, there is no denying that the man was trying to tell a story, and talk about some issues he felt were important. In the first trilogy, this was the sins of the father motif. In the PT, it was a treatise on how democracy falls, how people's fear can be used to get them to relinquish their freedom to a tyrant. Yeah, Lucas bungled the execution of the films badly (BADLY), but there is no denying that there are some big ideas in there.