Die Cast Lighted 1/350th TOS Enterprise (TOMY crowd funded)

Well, this has been quite a year waiting on this model. Disappointing, but a fair resolution in the end. I believe Chris and his team set out to make this model the best it could be and my hunch is the factory they commissioned over-promised on what they could do. By the time Chris realized it, any changes to the design would have most likely not been cost-feasible and Tomy management made him approve the final sample like it or not. In hindsight, that "highlight being the plugs on the right side" comment from the August update really does read like a deliberate inclusion by the team to discretely voice their dissatisfaction with the final sample.

While the model is not ideal, it's not bad for what it is at that price point. Seeing it lit up helps a lot. Unfortunately for me, it will always feel like an "almost good enough" model. It's a shame as a few tweaks would have made it significantly better. First off, place those plug holes on the left side. I could've justified it as being in spirit with the filming prop if they were on that side. But of course, they placed them on the right side and on top of that obstructed the 'clean' side of the ship with that stand and that's my biggest problem: that stand and the need for saucer support. A repaint would have been possible and I'm not totally convinced that filling in those seam-lines isn't doable. A few posts, a few pages ago, mentioned it being possible. However, there's not much I can do about modding the saucer to not need support. Maybe some JB weld would do it but I wouldn't know until I inspect it and at that point, it just seems like more work than it's worth. I'd rather go invest in a PL kit. I happened to be looking at them before this campaign launched. As it happened, the Tomy came along and was a nice looking model, aggressively priced, and my biggest concern was maybe the weathering wouldn't look good and need to be redone. Now knowing that it needs more work than that, I'd rather just invest my time and money into a PL kit. I'm not sure why they engineered it the way the did. I know diecast is popular with some but that wasn't a selling point for me. They really should've known the limitations of mass-producing with it but again, their factory most likely exaggerated their manufacturing capabilities. Or Tomy could've just built it like Master Replicas built theirs. Ah well.

As far as the Delorean project they're working on is concerned, I believe it will fare a little better. Looking at the promo pics, I saw some noticeable inaccuracies (well, for us RPF types) but nothing egregious enough for an average collector to notice and at its price point, you won't find anything nicer. And of course, diecast on cars is more familiar territory to work on. I didn't back it myself but it will probably be a decent model (for the price). We'll see. I'm 50/50 on Tomy right now. Good on them for offering refunds but they need to be more transparent about things. If they offered a Refit in diecast, I think I'd have to pass. Non-diecast Refit? I'd probably still pass but at least give it a look.
 
I haven’t asked but have mine and Pebble’s photos proliferated to other social media platforms (those that we did not post directly to)?

As there still seems to be quite a significant amount of people who aren’t aware of how it truly looks with the seams and updated base.

As customers who rely solely on the images just sent out by Tomy, are still likely to be blindsided!
That's a good question, I've just had a search around and it looks like they have appeared in a couple of places, like the Star Trek Prop Enthusiasts page.

There's also a few comments claiming that we must have gotten Chinese knock-offs and that Paramount will be coming after us for copyright infringement (lol).
 
Well, I ordered 2 (one to keep, one to resell), and honestly struggled where I would put or display this one. That made it an easy cancel decision. I still say if you made smaller ships under 8 lbs that lit up by USB power sized for something like a detolf, you'd kill it. Detolfs full of neat, well done, detailed, light up ships that I can turn on/off via google nest and/or amazon echo??? Sign me up!
 
I feel for those who preordered on eBay.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3461.jpeg
    IMG_3461.jpeg
    422.6 KB · Views: 175
Does anyone know if Tomy will accept partial cancelations? These were sold in sets of 1, 2, or 3. If your order was for multiple ships, can you cance all but one ship from the order?
 
I feel for those who preordered on eBay.
I'm one of those poor saps.. the$1249 guy which after seeing many sell for more I felt like I got a steal! ... Of course I definitely wouldn't do it again. You lucky devils who got it for the $599 stop complaining.. it could be worse.. at least you can cancel your order. ... but I'm still excited to get it.. first thing will be modding that darn stand.. seams and screw holes are disappointing and I'm sure not noticeable unless your a foot away and looking for them.... but the darn stand is just too darn distracting. Also I'm a seasoned dental technician :) .. I have lots of tools at hand to potentially fix the seams/holes if they bother me enough.
 
Last edited:
I'm the poor $1249 guy. Of course I definitely wouldn't do it again... but I'm still excited to get it.. first thing will be modding that darn stand.. seams and screw holes are disappointing and I'm sure not noticeable unless your a foot away and looking for them.... but the darn stand is just too darn distracting. Also I'm a seasoned dental technician :) .. I have lots of tools at hand to potentially fix the seams/holes if they bother me enough.

Honestly I don’t concentrate on many of the plug holes. Especially the ones under the saucer, that I barely even notice because of their location.

Of course I notice the seam along the saucer, but it doesn’t bother me all that much (provably because of my lack of familiarity with the show/ship). If it were the Galaxy class I probably would be annoyed to no end.

No one really mentions them, but it’s the plugs and seams along the Nacelle Pylons that stand out to me the most.

And obviously how the nacelles have been split right down the middle, but like most of the seams they’re all nice and straight. Kind of like an additional set of panel lines.


So at the end of the day, the most visually annoying aspect of this are the base support struts. Especially the one for the saucer section.
 
I'm one of those poor saps.. the$1249 guy which after seeing many sell for more I felt like I got a steal! ... Of course I definitely wouldn't do it again. You lucky devils who got it for the $599 stop complaining.. it could be worse.. at least you can cancel your order. ... but I'm still excited to get it.. first thing will be modding that darn stand.. seams and screw holes are disappointing and I'm sure not noticeable unless your a foot away and looking for them.... but the darn stand is just too darn distracting. Also I'm a seasoned dental technician :) .. I have lots of tools at hand to potentially fix the seams/holes if they bother me enough.
Wow if you do I would love to see pics! Sorry you paid so much but I do think the piece will be nice and worth the investment. i have hope.

I wonder if the bulk of the stand can be separated from the pole that holds the saucer section in place. I'm never going to saucer separate anyway and display the saucer on it's own. If it were just the pole supporting the saucer it would not be so bad.
 
Wow if you do I would love to see pics! Sorry you paid so much but I do think the piece will be nice and worth the investment. i have hope.

I wonder if the bulk of the stand can be separated from the pole that holds the saucer section in place. I'm never going to saucer separate anyway and display the saucer on it's own. If it were just the pole supporting the saucer it would not be so bad.

Nope. At least not without cutting it apart. But unfortunately the pole plugs into two sections. One end connects to the base, and then the other end connects to the bottom of the cup section of the saucer support strut.
 
That's a good question, I've just had a search around and it looks like they have appeared in a couple of places, like the Star Trek Prop Enthusiasts page.

There's also a few comments claiming that we must have gotten Chinese knock-offs and that Paramount will be coming after us for copyright infringement (lol).
Weren't these manufactured in China? Its more likely someone made a few "extra" and them made a few extra bucks on the side.
 
Weren't these manufactured in China? Its more likely someone made a few "extra" and them made a few extra bucks on the side.

Can’t see that being the case. Zing/EB Games is quite large here in Australia, and is actually owed by GameStop in the US. So highly unlikely they would do something that would easily open themselves to litigation.
 
Weren't these manufactured in China? Its more likely someone made a few "extra" and them made a few extra bucks on the side.
Like Phoenix said, these weren't bought from someone in China directly, or via some shady reseller, but a well established business with stores all across the country that wouldn't look to engage in that sort of thing just to make a few extra dollars.
 
I will be keeping mine.
65746E91-86A4-47BD-BD45-DDF86DE43562.jpeg


My email said shipping will be on October 6. I’ve seen everyone else mentioning the 9th. I guess I was flying inverted… :)

I will be keeping mine.
65746E91-86A4-47BD-BD45-DDF86DE43562.jpeg
This guy was the beekeeper that surely convinced me. Just don’t call me Shirley… or Uhura. :)
 

Attachments

  • 1F0F2B58-BABF-48DE-A58B-6FFC8773D804.jpeg
    1F0F2B58-BABF-48DE-A58B-6FFC8773D804.jpeg
    925 KB · Views: 76
Like Phoenix said, these weren't bought from someone in China directly, or via some shady reseller, but a well established business with stores all across the country that wouldn't look to engage in that sort of thing just to make a few extra dollars.
I remembering the Australian offering being mentioned back when we were still funding the US production. It was set up from the beginning and part of the original production run.
 
the saucer probably should have been the two pieces with the seam on the bottom half of the saucer. Where the pieces flush and attached to the bottom of the upper half. That way the seam would have been completely on the underside. But they have it with the seam all the way around the side of the saucer just above the windows. Not a good idea.
That sounds like the right way to do it but you have to think about how the parts are manufactured. The periphery of the saucer has a closed angle. If the top of the saucer was one piece with the opening at the bottom, it would be locked into the mold. That’s why the lid is at the top.
 
Back
Top