Im just going on what, AFAIK, the RPF rules are. I dont support the practice on anything.Ok well nobody would think it fine to recast a companies replica props who are not a member here, by nobody i should point out i actually mean nobody with any ethics.
And ethics aren't governed by RPF rules.
I see. Sorry, I tend to get confused on the whole subject of when it is and isn't okay to be a recaster. I guess so long as your not pissing off anyone you personaly know, then it's ok.
By the way, the Marushin Mateba was created from scratch based on the gun used in the TV series 'Ghost in the Shell'. It was a Limited Edition item.
The term "Honor among thieves" was bandied about a lot here in the old days. Way back when the only reasonable way to get a lightsaber was to either find the parts, and make it, or buy a resin copy.Sorry, I'm a little new to this whole discussion but I was wondering about a few things. LeMarchand does not own Warner Brothers Pictures right? He also is likely not Robert Fletcher who did the costumes for last Starfighter, right?(thanks IMDB) So what is the argument here? Party A can make $$ from reacsts of an original prop but not party B from casts of a recast? Isn't this like going to the police and complaining that someone stole your Cocaine? The logic just escapes me.
That's the whole issue and with trying not to turn this into yet another recasting morality discussion then it is quite simple. Most of what we do is against the law... but in order to stay under the radar the community self-governs itself so as to not have it spiral out of control and bring the full extent of the law down upon us and shut the whole community down. We make these rules up to protect ourselves and to prevent legal intervention - recasting brings unwanted attention to the community.Sorry, I'm a little new to this whole discussion but I was wondering about a few things. LeMarchand does not own Warner Brothers Pictures right? He also is likely not Robert Fletcher who did the costumes for last Starfighter, right?(thanks IMDB) So what is the argument here? Party A can make $$ from reacsts of an original prop but not party B from casts of a recast? Isn't this like going to the police and complaining that someone stole your Cocaine? The logic just escapes me.
Thats the best breakdown ive seen.That's the whole issue and with trying not to turn this into yet another recasting morality discussion then it is quite simple. Most of what we do is against the law... but in order to stay under the radar the community self-governs itself so as to not have it spiral out of control and bring the full extent of the law down upon us and shut the whole community down. We make these rules up to protect ourselves and to prevent legal intervention - recasting brings unwanted attention to the community.
Since it's all illegal, unless you only buy licensed stuff or actual screen used items, there is no legal security other than the trust and honor from the community to protect each other. Without it, it will just be a hive of scum freely exploiting others for the sake of their own wallets and prestige, without regard for the time, sweat, tears and money spent on making the original.
The community makes the rules - they are not legal, as the whole thing is illegal. It is done to retain and respect the craftsman, as why would he do or offer anything to the community if they just turn around and openly recast and flaunt it in his face?
****... didn't want to get into a long post about this... yet again, again... should have just written it simply - this is what I try to follow:
Cast off Screen Used - good (unless there are accurate licensed equivalents).
Cast off Licensed1 (no longer produced items) - not so good, but still not bad.
Cast off Licensed2 (still in production) - bad (as who wants a copy when you can get a real one?)
Copy of a copy or of a private individuals original work or offering (recast) - bad (I wanna grind somebody to a pulp fiction bad) .
In the model kit community all recasting is bad - copy of a licensed and unlicensed piece alike. But the whole community of garage kits is illegal, so they self-govern to protect the sculptor. Just to show how different communities can have different rules and guidelines on the subject.
Recasting drives away original artists and you are left with the same old, same old... bringing nothing new to the community.
Recasting drives away original artists and you are left with the same old, same old... bringing nothing new to the community.
Well, you may not make props that people want, but you do make things people want enough to steal.It goes beyond the physical too. I design video games as a hobby. Old school 16 bit stuff. I do the character sprites and the tiles. ive found so many of my character sprites out on the net, my name sImply removed and someone elses put in its place.
I may not make props that people want, but I do know the feeling.
NoHumorMan,
An excellent point.
There are things I have scratch built that I won't offer for this very reason. I know 3 other scratch builders who think the same way.
As I have said here before, this is the other way recasters cheat all of you.
The original artist sees recasting and decides not to offer it to the general public which cheats the prop/model enthusiest whos chances of getting a copy is now snuffed before any consideration is made to do copies.
As one example, here is a simple piece I did. I won't offer it since it can be duped by making the easiest type of mold. I have had people here on the RPF ask me to buy a copy and I turn them down because of recasting. I have given out perhaps 7 of these to friends...and one to Leslie Neilsen when he was in town.
Read up and report recasting news at PropSafe. http://s1.zetaboards.com/propsafe/index/
![]()
.
He used a female friend to buy a Last Starfighter gun (which i molded of my screen used original) realised too late it was actually him and of coarse he is now selling casts.
If I was you, I would not try to understand the recasting "thing" its pretty confusing.:lolI see. Sorry, I tend to get confused on the whole subject of when it is and isn't okay to be a recaster. I guess so long as your not pissing off anyone you personaly know, then it's ok.
By the way, the Marushin Mateba was created from scratch based on the gun used in the TV series 'Ghost in the Shell'. It was a Limited Edition item.
Is this the same guys?
http://www.arsenalmodels.com/
I ran across them at Dragoncon this year, looks like that have dropped in rubber every prop known to man.