USS Endeav
Sr Member
I can be nearly 100% certain of one thing.
Disney did NOT "infuse" Anovos with a single cent. I know someone that signed a Disney contract for her employer 10+ years ago and maintains contact with the account. I'm told Disney is frugal, exacting and scrutinizes every expenditure. That has been their policy for the entire relationship and through numerous changes in the point of contact. It seems unlikely they would shell out $ to a third party they can buy in a snap just to avoid the appearance of negative press when they in fact had no part in the "negative" of the negative press. Their inclusion in the lawsuit is a lawyers idea and for obvious reasons. Even if every NGO made a stink of this, Disney wouldn't even register it as a gnat.
Disney did NOT "infuse" Anovos with a single cent. I know someone that signed a Disney contract for her employer 10+ years ago and maintains contact with the account. I'm told Disney is frugal, exacting and scrutinizes every expenditure. That has been their policy for the entire relationship and through numerous changes in the point of contact. It seems unlikely they would shell out $ to a third party they can buy in a snap just to avoid the appearance of negative press when they in fact had no part in the "negative" of the negative press. Their inclusion in the lawsuit is a lawyers idea and for obvious reasons. Even if every NGO made a stink of this, Disney wouldn't even register it as a gnat.