vaderdarth
Master Member
Gino, believe it or not, I more or less agree with all the things you've posted concerning the mitre and form and shape of the box. I would like to add, however that there is no way to know whether some of the "artifacts" we see such as fingerprints etc in our castings, were from a recast of the original item......ie fingerprints of the guys making a copy of that piece (demoulding too quickly etc...). Same for the warpage etc.... I can't imagine that warpage was found on the original chestbox as it's not seen in the stills. If it is a lump of clay as we believe, and it was sculpted on a flat surface (we assume) then there should be no warpage. The obvious tear in the mould etc... there is an awful lot of artifacts that were definitely not on the original casting. Now here is another point we have to ponder. We are reasonably sure that the tour suits were simply full castings of the original complete chestbox which had all it's details painted......buttons etc... Some of these artifacts on our castings, could mean it was derived from tour castings. Just some points to ponder.
Dave
Dave