First off, I want to show that while I have a VERY low post count, as a member of this community I should be heard as well. While I've only been an official member for a few days, I've been following this community for at least 2 years, with registration problems and missing the registration periods, by a few hours in one case. So, I don't think you can really use post counts as a sole reason to discredit someones opinion. I do, however, lend credit to those with high post counts as it shows a high level of commitment to the hobby.
I care about this hobby too. I know I would hate it if I created an original sculpt and someone just slung some rubber around it and started selling it, here or elsewhere. I would REALLY hate it if I had spent some serious cash on an original screen used piece and then someone just started recasting my casts, but I think that is a risk you assume by purchasing someone else's original work (screenused or not) and recasting it without their permission. This has kept me from buying screenused before, because I knew it would happen and I knew it would make me sick.
How do you think they guys that created the original screen used piece feel about Ian's recasting of it? Are we just supposed to ignore their rights but uphold Ian's? I get it, there wouldn't be any screenused replica's out there if we all had to get the permission of the original creator, but saying it's ok for Ian to purchase someone else's work and recast it, but it's not OK for SD to do it is the definition of hypocrisy.
Ian has had three weeks to object to this, and so far he hasn't directly done so. Is he even offering them anymore? If not, I don't see how there is anything wrong with SD repairing them and offering them for sale. If he was simply recasting with no serious effort added, that would be unacceptable whether or not Ian is still offering them, at least to me.
On a side note, I think there is some awesome information that has been shared in this thread and would hate to see it shut down. If RPF staff end up determining SD can't sell these and then he does, by all means they have the right to ban him, but I would hate to see the knowledge shared here to disappear.
EDIT: I just read ONIGIRL's post that was posted while i was typing that loooong post. ONIGIRL, I think your argument is valid if Ian is still offering these, and as far as I can tell he isn't. If he's not, he obviously doesn't care about recouping any investment. While it is a slippery slope, at some point I think he loses his recasting rights by no longer offering them. If the repaired casting by SD is the best people can get, then I see no problem with him selling these.