I agree with what was said above - Cochran owned that jury and he deserved to be there based on how he played the game. I hate the argument that it was unfair, or low or disrespectful to vote out Brenda after she gave up her win for others to get family time and food. The only way to guarantee you survive another 3 days is to win immunity. If being nice is all it takes to win the game, Survivor would be the most boring show on television.
And here is why I feel that Burnett/Probst were willing to do whatever it takes (read: bend the rules) for Rob so that he could get his million (after 4 tries) and Jeff could finally say he was the best player in survivor history - Erik shows signs of starvation and the decision is made to pull him from the game instead of giving him any nourishment first and allowing him some time to recover. However, Boston Rob shows signs of severe dehydration after a challenge and Jeff allows the medics to give him water and time to recover so that Rob can make the decision that he can continue playing - even though he couldn't stand on his own two feet (if I recall correctly, didn't Russell Swan have a blackout from the same thing and he was removed as well?).
And here is why I feel that Burnett/Probst were willing to do whatever it takes (read: bend the rules) for Rob so that he could get his million (after 4 tries) and Jeff could finally say he was the best player in survivor history - Erik shows signs of starvation and the decision is made to pull him from the game instead of giving him any nourishment first and allowing him some time to recover. However, Boston Rob shows signs of severe dehydration after a challenge and Jeff allows the medics to give him water and time to recover so that Rob can make the decision that he can continue playing - even though he couldn't stand on his own two feet (if I recall correctly, didn't Russell Swan have a blackout from the same thing and he was removed as well?).
Last edited: