I think Russell is an effective manipulator but terrible at the social game. For all his plans, manipulations, etc. when it came to the social game he totally dropped the ball. It certainly seemed Russell was genuinely confused as to why he didn't win. Being the smartest guy in the room will only get you as far on Survivor as it translates through your season's particular social dynamic.
I've always felt there is no one way to win Survivor. Russell seemed stuck on his one strength which is the ability to manipulate people to a certain point. Once Russell hits that point his game seems to go in the toilet.
I disagree. There have been plenty of Juries in the past who would've recognized Russell's mad skills at outwitting, outplaying, outlasting everyone else on the island, and would've rewarded him with the million dollars. Russell just had the bad luck of going up against the most bitter Jury members each time, that I've ever seen on the show. Especially the All-Stars, led by Rupert et. al.
Anyone who thinks Natalie and Sandra--people who did absolutely NOTHING during their ENTIRE respective seasons--deserved the million over Russell, you live in a different world than I do.
The Wook
ps~Sluis, you're right, it was beyond rotten to repay Brenda's extraordinary generosity that way. I hope Eddie can capitalize on that huge betrayal.
Last edited: