Re: Han Solo Force Awakens Blaster is not a c96
Even since the handgun ban?
I imagine that if it is possible to use real handguns at all, the amount of red tape would make more hassle than it is worth.
Don't forget that there really isn't any need for these guns to be functional.
They are supposed to be laser guns from another galaxy after all.
In ANH, they used blanks in the E11 blasters, presumably for effects cues, and this had the unwanted side effect of ejected empty casings being visible in some frames.
With the technology that filmmakers have today, there is absolutely no need to use blanks in a blaster.
If they were filming a war film or something, then realistic firearms would be necessary, but Star Wars, not so much.
Even since the handgun ban?
I imagine that if it is possible to use real handguns at all, the amount of red tape would make more hassle than it is worth.
Don't forget that there really isn't any need for these guns to be functional.
They are supposed to be laser guns from another galaxy after all.
In ANH, they used blanks in the E11 blasters, presumably for effects cues, and this had the unwanted side effect of ejected empty casings being visible in some frames.
With the technology that filmmakers have today, there is absolutely no need to use blanks in a blaster.
If they were filming a war film or something, then realistic firearms would be necessary, but Star Wars, not so much.