Riceball
Master Member
With the advent of CGI special effects taking over and effectively making it so that a Director today can basically do whatever shot or effect they want in a film.. Gone are the days of those unique creative solutions in filmmaking that only ever arose from the inability of a director to do whatever they originally wanted in the first place.
Iconic images in film like the three yellow barrels in JAWS, which add so much unbelievable tension to that movie just acting as a mere representation of the shark rather than showing the actual shark itself all the time, only ever happened because the damn robotic shark hardly ever worked..
Those imaginative solutions that actually often ended up making the film infinitely better in the end because of the need to overcome the limitations in what was possible, that has largely been lost forever
That little bit of Movie Magic is dead
I'd disagree because, despite what a lot of people seem to thing, CG effects take a lot more than a simple click of the mouse. It takes many, many man hours to produce good CG effect with lots of steps involved. Because of that, some directors will find and use those creative solutions because what they're wanting to do would take too long and thus cost too much to do; not much different from the days of practical effects.
If Jaws didn't originally come out back in the '70s and came out today, it's entirely conceivable that the director, be it Spielberg or someone else, may have gone with the same approach if they couldn't afford to hire a top notch effects studio to make the shark. Because, in order to make a photoreal giant shark will require top notch modelers to model the shark, talented animators to make it move, highly detailed and realistic texturing to make it look real, then you need a team of people to light the scene and composite it into the scene either in actual water or CG water. All of that takes time, esp. the compositing and rendering and time is money.
Last edited: