Solo4114
Master Member
I don't think there was a group called the Wolves in the comics. There was a group that tried breaking into Alexandria, but they all got taken out. I'm not sure there were any surviving Wolves on the show, either.
Yeah, the "Wolves" in the comics weren't anyone important. Small scavenger group, I think their attack ultimately prompts the walkers breaking in to the compound (along with Jessie and Ron's deaths), but they aren't treated as some important separate group the way they were in the show.
Which really highlights something the show often does: it takes beats from the comics and turns them into loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong detours for the show, which just emphasizes how the show relies on filler, because it often only develops these beats fairly poorly. Honestly, the only one that I thought was decent was Shane's descent into madness at the Farm. Everything else that they've done in this regard has been eyeroll-inducing.
Examples of the "half-season slowdowns":
- Sophia is missing.
- Shane goes nuts while Carl heals up at the farm.
- The looooooooong walk to the Prison.
- Andrea is undercover at Woodbury/The Governor's backstory.
- The looooooooong walk from the Prison to Terminus.
- The looooooooong walk from Terminus to Alexandria.
- The roamer horde at Alexandria at the quarry/Did Glenn die?
The show does this stuff all the time, and it just gets tedious because the pacing for it is never right.
I don't mind this cliffhanger at all. You had to know it was coming. With this one though, you know someone is getting their skull bashed in. The Glenn things was stupid and unnecessary.
I agree.... "Who shot JR?"
That was the biggest buzz that summer and is STILL referenced 30 years later. Cliff hangers have been part of television history and used on so many season endings.
But what do you expect? Today the younger generations are used to getting what they want, when they want and don't recall the days of having to actually wait. The entitlement generation :lol
The issue isn't that it's a cliffhanger. Cliffhanger endings ARE accepted, generally, by modern audiences IF they aren't overused, IF the show generally has good pacing otherwise, and IF the show doesn't tend to resort to cheap audience manipulation gimmicks as a regular course of action.
Case in point: Is Jon Snow dead? Is Stannis? What's gonna happen to Dany now that Drogon took her from Mereen? All on Game of Thrones, all of which have generally been well accepted by the audience. Even the deviations from the books have been mostly accepted by the audience (e.g. the episode in Season 4 where Jon goes north of the wall to kill off Karl and the mutineers.
Why don't audiences rebel at this stuff? Mostly because Game of Thrones is an exceptionally well-told story with solid pacing throughout each season. TWD, on the other hand, regularly relies on trickery and padding out its seasons, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if audiences are just fed up with it at this point.
I stopped watching after Glenn went missing this season. Not because I was "angry" at the show, but because I was just bored with it. I knew he wasn't missing. I knew he'd come back (probably so he could be killed off later or something), and it was just pointless manipulation. I also know the pattern for TWD seasons now:
10 First Half of Season:
20 Eps. 1 and 2: big action, setting up what you think will be a pretty cool, forward-moving season/half-season.
30 Eps. 3, 4, 5: pointless milling around, lots of talking among characters, characters behaving in ways you find out-of-character, not much being accomplished.
40 Ep. 6: big action, ending on a cliffhanger "to build tension."
50 Second Half of Season.
60 Goto 10.