The Thing prequel

I have to say I liked it a lot it answered everything I wanted to have answered going in and did a great job of showing what led to all the damage and deaths shown in the original 1982 movie plus you can watch both back to back with no problems

it gets a 4 out of 5 in my book
 
I always thought that maybe if it slip into too many pieces, like it did in the Carpenter movie, the individuals aren't as smart as when it's one whole being so that could be why it revealed itself in that scene in the original.
 
The original (82) version is one of my top 10 films and I really liked this prequel. They did a great job with it, even the small details like the axe stuck in the wall the Mac ducks past in the original you get to see get stuck into the wall here chopping a thing piece up. It was those little details that only really matter to fans of the original that I appreciated. Hard to make a film connect to such an old and much loved movie as the original 82 version, I think they did the best job they could have, and really like it.:thumbsup

I think you mean the "remake" that came out in (82). The original came out in 1951.
 
yep. It's considered a classic, but I always found it hokey. I guess that's what happens when you watch the JC version first. :p
 
yep. It's considered a classic, but I always found it hokey. I guess that's what happens when you watch the JC version first. :p

I feel its a better example of filmmaking than I do Howard Hawks film, as well as a better story and better characters. I've seen both, but I like Carpenter's because it seems a bit more realistic in character and the situation.
 
Last edited:
I saw it over the weekend. I enjoyed it and it is the extremely rare prequel that doesn't tarnish the original. I didn't care for the overuse of CGI, I heard it was a 50/50 mix of it and practical. But unless they just covered up the practical stuff with CG tentacles I didn't notice. Really the only major issue was that the Thing seemed to be stalking them more than just trying to take over and attack when confronted. Maybe since this is before, it learned from the experience and decided to hide more or it could have just been in survival mode and desperate to assimilate as quickly as possible.

Still it was a fairly decent movie and the monster designs were really good.
 
The CGI and motives for the creature disturbs me greatly. The lack of reported continuity of the Norweigen with White-out googles and such, just sounds like laziness.

From the reviews, it sounds like what really kills the film is the lack of character developement. Which in turn kills it for me. You can count me out now for any plans on a ticket purchase. :/
 
I liked it! I don't think it's as good as the original, and I'm sorry the ORIGINAL is the Carpenter one. I'm not scared by a ****ing smart carrot. I'm scared by something that's going to CONSUME me and BECOME me and can be ANYONE else. I like how they explained things in the JC version by showing it here, like why there was an axe stuck in a wall, the two faced one that was burnt in the snow and taken back to the American camp, why Lars (the only one who didn't speak English) was so freaked out in the beginning of the JC version, why the ship wasn't able to be used, that they actually WENT in the ship. (I mean really, finding an alien is cool, finding it's SPACE SHIP is COOLER and I'd be in there a lot more)

I like how you could watch this prequel, then stick in the JC version and watch it back to back with almost no disruption.
 
From the reviews, it sounds like what really kills the film is the lack of character developement. Which in turn kills it for me. You can count me out now for any plans on a ticket purchase. :/

Those reviews are dumb then. How much does a person really change in LESS THAN A DAY? It's a HORROR movie, not a ****ing character piece. Morons.
 
I liked it! I don't think it's as good as the original, and I'm sorry the ORIGINAL is the Carpenter one. I'm not scared by a ****ing smart carrot. I'm scared by something that's going to CONSUME me and BECOME me and can be ANYONE else. I like how they explained things in the JC version by showing it here, like why there was an axe stuck in a wall, the two faced one that was burnt in the snow and taken back to the American camp, why Lars (the only one who didn't speak English) was so freaked out in the beginning of the JC version, why the ship wasn't able to be used, that they actually WENT in the ship. (I mean really, finding an alien is cool, finding it's SPACE SHIP is COOLER and I'd be in there a lot more)

I like how you could watch this prequel, then stick in the JC version and watch it back to back with almost no disruption.

I agree, I saw this today and I was pleasantly surprised.

I saw JC's when it came out at the theater and its almost the same situation, getting mixed or bad reviews because its too gross or not scary enough. Try telling that to the girl sitting behind me who was freaking out. I never jump at stuff in a movie, but I will admit there were a couple of times when I knew something was going to happen and I still nearly came out of my seat.

Yes its a encampment in Antartica, yes the thing goes after people, yes there are flame throwers but not once did I feel like I was watching the same movie. You have to remember, when JC's movie came out you didn't have the knowledge before hand what was going to happen or what you were going to see. Its going to have more suspense and scares, as it was new. This one you know going in what to expect, like riding a different roller coaster, has the same feel but its a whole new ride.

They don't try and waste your time, once things start happening its non stop till the end.

I think they did a great job matching the sets and situations to what the camp looked like in JC's movie. The effects were good, only one small scene in the dark looked a little iffy.

When I was watching the scenes at the end credits, it brought a smile to my face :):thumbsup

Definately buying this when it comes out.
 
Same here, I LOVED the ending. That original score ends it perfectly. Here's to hoping they give us a sequel :thumbsup
 
I agree, I really enjoyed it too.

I thought that everyone who worked on the movie seemed to care about the '82 version and gave it their best.
 
Those reviews are dumb then. How much does a person really change in LESS THAN A DAY? It's a HORROR movie, not a ****ing character piece. Morons.

QTF, well said.

If you want a character piece go watch "The Help":lol
 
So you $hitting all over the JC version at this point? I haven't seen it....yet. But I'm gonna be blunt here. If you don't care or relate with the characters the movie failed. Nuff said.
 
Saw it opening night. While I agree that its not "film of the year" worthy, it was FAR from being a bad movie and personally I freaking loved it and had few if ANY complaints.

Felt like a good companion piece to JCs original and ill agree that it segues so perfectly into that film, leaving almost no loose ends untied, that it has that "part 1/part 2" feel to it, or one big movie if watched back to back.

On its own, i liked how it alluded to but didnt blatantly rip off or copy any major elements unique to the first film. kept it fresh and interesting. Just like a poster above said, its like another rollercoaster ride, yeah theres loops and turns, but still fun and enjoyable nonetheless.

They also did VERY well in keeping the look in sync with the time period. too many were fearing the look would be too "advanced" due to a few shots from the trailers, but i was pleasantly surprised to see that the stayed true to the setting. Also, the picture projection in this theater was VERY clear, crisp, clean and on a LARGE aspect ratio so you got to enjoy it as a true spectacle of film display.

Creature designs were awesome, and despite what you see in trailers, they have been updated graphically and rendered/animated much better so they dont look as "obviously CG" as you would have thought. You could tell that there were practical elements under some of the digital extensions, but the CG elements are done so well that you almost dont even notice except for one particular creature in particular that Im not going to mention (no its not one seen in any released material so far). Overall, very well done. Extremely faithful to JC while being its own unique flavor of body horror.

AS for suspense, yeah this film has a faster pace, and while that does create a sense of urgency and "holy crap we gotta kill this thing!" and that is perfectly appropriate, it does take a few points off of the "growing terror" factor IMVHO, though I will admit there were a few times where the suspense did work wonderfully, and even surprised me as a viewer with the twists and turns it took you on, though I will also admit I want to kick myself in the ass for jumping at a moment I could see coming a mile away! :lol guess its like a cruise missile, youll see the blast coming, it doesnt "surprise you" or catch you off guard, but roasts you nonetheless.


Ending scene of course, was the icing on the cake ;)

The only MAJOR complaint (really a non issue, just a personal peeve) I have is the final showdown, because I felt like I had watched that EXACT SAME SCENE at the end of Cowboys and Aliens, but other than that I had no real problems.


Now for some more speculative aspects, this one did shed new light on how the thing (cant call it any other title, creature, alien, virus, cell colony, etc just seem inappropriate for some reason) works, but it also raises a lot of questions as well. Like the people who get infected pretty much right off the bat. What contact did they have? or maybe is it that the thing can emit microscopic "spores" or "darts" into everyone or even something as mundane as "doc touched it, then shakes your hand now youre infected".

Another curiosity is that it seems to favor the "slow infection" theory in that you may seem normal and think youre normal, but youre secretly being assimilated from the inside out until the things cells gain enough control over your chemical makeup to do enslave its molecular motor functions and use it as a vessel and a tool for its purposes, all the while you are still alive and conscious while it does the remainder of its work. this, to me, REALLY heightened the suspense of the picture, because ANYONE could be taken over, even if they were only like 1% infected at the end of the picture, they were still doomed, which, to me, makes even the "meaningless" deaths significant; I wont spoil the ending, but given this idea, the charged emotions running thru that scene, and the subsequent realization afterward, dont seem too far fetched or out of place, and proved to be VERY effective. This also makes you re watch the Carpenter picture with a whole new shade of glasses as a means of filling in some of the gaps that were never explained in that movie.

the final speculation is, of course, the ship itself. Ive never believed it was the ONE thing piloting that gargantuan saucer (why such a HUGE ship for a single pilot? unless its 95% engines and warp drives, and even THEN, why only a one man crew to maintain the WHOLE ship?). Heck the very indication that it CRASH LANDED makes me think that it originally had a multi species crew that had the thing as either a biochemical weapon, study specimen, trophy, or even a crew member (but it just doesnt seem plausible that the thing would be THAT intelligent given its instinctive nature), or maybe a single species crew that captured the thing after it had assimilated many prior species, though given the details of this film Ill lean on the former multi species crew theory based on geometries alone.

Either way, the thing breaks out and absorbs the whole crew, causing the surviving pilot to crash land in Antarctica, away from any more potential sources of nutrients for the thing. Given that it seems to NEED material to assimilate, it breaks out of the ship and exposes itself to the elements in order to preserve itself rather than burn all its calories so to speak. I had LONG suspected this to be the case, and even the film makers themselves confirmed it stating that they had shot material showing this to be the case, either in flashback at the start of the film or aftermath footage at the end of the film, but due to story focus issues they cut it out. While im sad to see they didnt add that in, as for to me it would have filled in gaps and potential plot holes regarding the things origin, it WAS The right move for plot and story concerns. maybe well get a deleted scene on the blu ray?

Anyways, ive rambled on too long about this! lol

Just take my recommendation and GO SEE THIS MOVIE! :D

Regards,

IMP
 
QTF, well said.

If you want a character piece go watch "The Help":lol

Seems to be some confusion between Superdrool and his 'opponents' about character development and character believability...

Of course no one expects development from characters in a movie like this, but believability would be nice. Haven't read too much in these reviews here about great character writing/acting - which is always mentioned in the same breath as Bottin's FX when talking about the joys of Carpenter's film...

Tempted to see it, though. Sounds like it has its attractions. Though the attraction for me has nothing to do with finding out how twoface came to be or how the axe in the wall happened. This knowledge, for me, will forever act to the detriment of Carpenter's creepy "wtf happened here??' scenes at the Norwegian base. The axe in the wall, the melted guy in the chair are meant to overwhelm you with perplexed horror, by forcing your imagination to run wild - wtf IS this, what in the world happened here??? Watch this prequel and that effect will surely be gone. The mere risk that it will be gone is making me change my mind again about buying a ticket...Mystery replaced by pedantry is not one of the movie's attractions for me. Sounds like at best I get a rollercoaster ride with some good thrills here and there. Not sure if I want to trade in Carpenter's classic for such a small payback, because you do trade it in, I fear.
 
I like the 1951 movie and the Carpenter movie equally but I also put them in different categories as the 1951 movie couldn't have been scary to anyone even back then other than kids. I'll be getting this on dvd for sure and watching it first then the Carpenter one since I haven't seen it in a really long time. Carpenter managed to do his character development in scenes without you even realizing using their interactions. Generally this style of scifi/horror movie doesn't need much development in my opinion cause half the characters die before you get to like/dislike them anyhow. It's the same with straight up horror movies, usually the cast is butchered before you know much about them other than the leads and a few others they string along.
 
Back
Top