The only scene I've liked so far...they should've, also, filmed BF with his helmet on and the glare of Fire and Brimstone reflected into his visorStill like seeing this..
I guess I'm wrong, because I never referred to "The Concord" as just "Concord."
Do you refer to the ship as "Titanic" or "THE Titanic?" 
Its the closest we have seen to Actual Rage and agree the reflection would show even more menace to his character... I'd like to see more War Battle Action like this... Be Bold Be Vigilant..Be a Warrior!The only scene I've liked so far...they should've, also, filmed BF with his helmet on and the glare of Fire and Brimstone reflected into his visor
"The" normally predates The notion of grandeur pomp by an Owner or Admirer linked to a specific Item or thing no ?I guess I'm wrong, because I never referred to "The Concord" as just "Concord."
Yep, I said it before: the helmet removal was one of the big mistake the writers could've done. Boba Fett, mysterious bounty hunter with so few words? Gone forever
That's why I liked the Mandalorian; never remove your helmet!!!!! (I would've kept it on, even when saying good-bye to the child!). Now we have that guy suffering from PTSD, or something...I want to be entertained by fantasy, not real life thank you!
And also by the "One-Off" side of the person/thing.
No one ever talked about how his bionics also eliminated any susceptibility to claustrophobia.
The Post office? The grocery store? The beach? The garbage dump? It specifies rather than generalizes? Flying on "A" Concord. Going to "A" grocery store... those are nonspecific. Why am I arguing this? What was the original point??
The novella of Boba Fett.
Believe it
I wish that were true
Who doesn’t love max?! Didn’t the actor his name escapes me right now.. who played ackbar also played max?
Would be difficult since he doesn't have his armor....The only scene I've liked so far...they should've, also, filmed BF with his helmet on and the glare of Fire and Brimstone reflected into his visor
