Star Wars has only been about "in media res" because the one standalone Star Wars film George set out to do was done that way to evoke the feeling of coming into the middle of a serialized story. If he'd actually intended it, at the time, to be realized as a serialized story, he'd've started at the beginning and gone ever forward. There would be story gaps between episodes, but minor. There would not be such huge gaps in story or character between one episode and the next that the audience has no idea what's going on or why the returning characters are utterly unfamiliar.
To get to where we started in TFA, we needed to have actually seen at least some of the story leading to that point. Doesn't have to be all of it, but when 86% of the ST is Mystery Box, that's bad writing.
Be that as it may, it's been a hallmark of the series with each film since then too. I'm not saying these films are perfect, I'm just calling out how they relate to and recall the things previous (loved) films do.
Not really...? The gap between Star Wars and Empire was a few years, long enough for the Rebels to have been on the run for a while and are
just finally getting a new base established. We knew at the end of Star Wars that the Empire wasn't gone -- just the
Death Star. We knew Vader survived. The opening crawl tells us he has ships and is chasing the Rebels. And also, apparently, in that gap, he found out who fired the final shot.
Empire to Jedi is even less of a jump. An indeterminate but not massive amount of time passes. The end of Empire was them beginning the op to get Han back from Jabba's palace, and the beginning of Jedi shows that in progress. The opening crawl also tells us the Empire is building another
Death Star.
TPM to AOTC jumps a decade, but as with the SW to ESB jump, while there's content we
could have seen in that span, we don't
need to to grasp everything relevant. Anakin ended TPM about to be trained and starts AOTC having been being trained. Politics have been happening. Obi-Wan grew a beard. Padmé finished her term as Queen and is now serving as Senator.
AOTC to ROTS is problematic, as, while it's only a couple years, it jumps right over the Clone Wars. As the series showed us, a lot of very relevant stuff happened in there. As a result, Anakin's arc feels very forced (because it is).
The problems begin showing up in this era because of George drastically foreshortening the run-time in which he was allowing his story to be told. This includes the 19-year jump, now, from ROTS to SW, where his own original timeline puts the lie to that. His Clone Wars were originally over a decade of related conflicts (hence the plural). The Jedi fell into disfavor around then, yes, but Anakin's turn was later, and the Empire was later still -- five-ish years before SW, maybe. Luke was in his early 20s, Leia was 18, and they'd be revealed as cousins later on. I like to include Rogue One here, and Rebels, because those fill in the essential points jumped over -- the beginning of the Rebel Alliance (and George also should have kept the scenes in ROTS of the senators meeting to discuss what to do about Palpatine's power grab, and their presenting their declaration to him) and the battle where the
Death Star plans were stolen, both of which SW's opening crawl refers to.
Currently, that's the most TFA-like content jump. If you're watching them in George's preferred order, for the first time, you're going to get to Episode IV and go, "Wait, how much time has passed? Civil War? Last I saw there was some opposition to Palpatine's emergency powers, but what? Battle? Princess Leia? Is that the baby we just saw born? Or another Leia?" and then start to fill stuff in along the way about how much time has passed -- Leia refers to being from Alderaan, which jibes with Bail taking in Baby Leia, realizing that this Luke is the baby we had just also seen, so Owen and Beru (and, later, Obi-Wan and Tarkin) are significantly older, etc.
It's still bad writing, even if George did it first.
I never said the writing was great, but at the end of the day I am a Star Wars fan and these movies are still Star Wars, even if not the pinnacle of the series.
Me, too. If I didn't care, I wouldn't critique. And even though each one should've been a trilogy in its own right, I like the ST better than the PT, for the most part. I also hope, like Clone Wars, Solo ends up being a cinematic pilot for a series so we can see where Qir'a goes from there, and I would dearly love some live-action versions of Brian Daley's Han Solo adventures to show us some of what Han's up to prior to meeting him in Mos Eisley. I treat it and Rogue One, despite my issues with
them, as Episodes 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.
I'm looking forward to having more than The Mandalorian and Resistance to fill in what happened between ROTJ and TFA...