Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Pre-release)

Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I like RO-T8!


the twitter account seems too legit... the posts are very clever... lots of quirky attitude without being amateur... someone behind this is in the know and official. the posts are all fun and worth following. I doubt its a farce... I'm going with RO-T8 until proven otherwise... and that name keeps it in the R series :D
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I think we should start using spoiler tags a little more... at least for thing's not in the trailer?
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

well, the latest tweet has an image with profanity (Mother F... ) in it so now its not looking so legit. :( if it was Lucasfilm/Disney associated that meme wouldn't fly. oh well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Are you an angel? ;)

But that still leaves it unclear where he was born.

It does. It's never said in the movies themselves and prior to your revelation from the website, I'd never heard it or seen it in print anywhere else. I thought he was Tatooine born and bred!
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Stabilized Falcon shot (not my work)

http://www.gfycat.com/SmoothLongAnnelida#

Well now I'm even less excited about the film. With it stabilized, which it definitely won't be in the final product, it looks like proper Star Wars. :cry

EDIT: I haven't even said what I did and didn't like.
Liked:
So many practical effects
little touches like the new satellite dish, the "PULL TO INFLATE", and Ridley's old stormtrooper helmet goggles
The fact that there is a new stormtrooper design (though I dislike it)
Everything about Ridley's character from what little we saw
I gotta admit that seeing the Falcon again was pretty rad, just like seeing it in Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy
Disliked:
The gorram shaky cam. I like it in JJ's other works, even in Star Trek because that was a reboot and not a continuation, but since this is a continuation of a previously established (also probably my favorite) universe, it feels weird. Hence the comment on the stabilized Falcon footage.
Everything else about the cinematography, from the weird trailer jump cuts to the tracking shot of our new Sith.
The fact that the speed of the tracking shot necessitated two extra blades to make it look menacing, when a slower shot could have been just as menacing with one red blade. Also, the cruciform hilt just looks wrong, even if it could be used in an effective manner through classic German longsword tactics
The white blasters.
The lack of greeble stuff on both the Alliance pilots and stormtrooper armor.
Double popsickle speeder being so hilariously oversized compared to the diminutive Ridley and all previous speeders in the series
Neutral:
R0-T8
The new stormtrooper helmets
The X-wing s-foils
That menacing voiceover

Not that my opinion matters or anything.
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I think we should start using spoiler tags a little more... at least for thing's not in the trailer?

We posted a link to the concept art previously and this thread has been replete with spoilers.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

We posted a link to the concept art previously and this thread has been replete with spoilers.
I don't disagree that it's been full of spoilers (I wasn't singling anyone out). I'm just hopeful that we can continue the thread without massive spoilers... I know there was some discussion about that prior to the trailer release (after I posted a link with spoiler warnings that folks discussed very liberally without tags or warning).

This thread isn't marked as a spoiler thread and I just hope we can start discussing the movie with some warnings.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I was gonna make an argument about how the fighting style has no bearing on the lightsaber choice. Unless it is dual blade, a lightsaber cuts the same. The Claymore fighting stance relies on heavy swings, a lightsaber would chop you in half with a light passing. So fencing it would be because first strike wins!

But Rule of Cool wants me to see a revamped fighting style in line with the claysaber. I would like a samurai showdown too, two combatants pass by each other and strike and only one falls.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Really that could get reposted every other page and I wouldn't even be mad! :lol
I understood everything except for the rollerball droid and the camera with rocks around it?

The rocks thing was lampooning one of Georges recent BD additions, whilst R2 was hiding from the Sandpeople in the shadows of a rock formation,....George ordered that the droid was better hidden by CG'ing more rocks in front of him, which appear & disappear in different shots & also would make R2's hiding place impossible for him to get in and out of

J
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I don't disagree that it's been full of spoilers (I wasn't singling anyone out). I'm just hopeful that we can continue the thread without massive spoilers... I know there was some discussion about that prior to the trailer release (after I posted a link with spoiler warnings that folks discussed very liberally without tags or warning).

This thread isn't marked as a spoiler thread and I just hope we can start discussing the movie with some warnings.

Thats a good point and there may be something REALLY important leaked at some point. I agree, lets all use some discretion and the Spoiler tags going forward if its something really big.

- - - Updated - - -

ummm... I think you're forgetting the original Star Wars Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gvqpFbRKtQ

Wow, you're right. It's funny, I was 8 when that came out and yet have no recollection of seeing it in theaters.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Could we please define "shaky" cam? The original shaky cam, which Sam Raimi "developed" for Evil Dead, was a camera mounted on a 2x4 and carried by two guys. The Coen Brothers then used it in Blood Simple. It wasn't really all that shaky.

When I hear "shaky," I think shaky. That silly "cinema verite" gimmick of jiggling the camera, which simulates, what—a kid running through a forest with a Super 8 camera? Like The Shield, which I couldn't watch because the camera wouldn't stop moving.

In one of the PT movies, maybe AotC, they used a zoom/rack-focus (?) shot on one of the troop transports—a shot that I loved because it was straight out of Message From Space, and dates back to early kaiju movies. Then of course they started using it for everything, the stomach-churning culmination of which was the new Battlestar: Galactica, which could not show a simple locked-off shot of a ship in space, but instead subjected the viewer to a constant onslaught of jiggles and pans and zoom-ins and zoom-outs and refocusing ad nauseam. (Not that I have strong feelings about it.)

The Falcon shot is more "follow cam" or "tracking cam," right? Couldn't we use a more accurate term? Or am I just going to have to adjust my brain to accept an inferior/inaccurate label because it's already caught on?

Update: OK, I see that there is some additional jiggle with the trooper shots, but that makes total sense in terms of setting the scene/dramatic effect. And that, yeah, I would call shaky. With a purpose.
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I'm fine with calling it a ridiculously unstable tracking shot. The stability is the entire issue, and I think we refer to it as "shaky cam" because it looks like Michael J Fox or my great grandmother is holding the camera.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Yea I don't get the complaints about the Falcon loop at all. It's like being on a roller coaster. It's disorientating at first and then as it rushes back to the ground and the sand/dust kicks up it's evident that it's a high speed chase/evade situation. I find it stunning and exciting.Screw old school as far as this goes.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I feel that one of the issues with the Falcon shot is, in the OT, you relied on computer controlled camera shots, and nothing was that elaborate.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens

1417303645705.gif
 
Back
Top