Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Pre-release)

Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I actually liked that part. It parallels how Hitler positioned himself into power. That's kind of a big part of the series. You can't tell Anakin's story without showing how Sidious became Emperor...
With all due respect, I disagree. From a storytelling standpoint, it's only important that Palpatine/Sidious is in a position of power, not how he got there. Lucas could have saved a lot of time by already having Palpatine/Sidious in power, and spent that time showing how Anakin became such a "cunning warrior" and, subsequently, how and why Vader was so feared. Instead, we got a whiny punk who appears to have decided to give himself over to the darkside almost overnight, and a brief shot of Vader standing on the bridge of a Republic Star Destroyer with his arms crossed.

I sincerely believe this is one of the reasons the animated Clone Wars series' came into existence--so that Lucas (through Lucasfilm) could finally tell at least part of the story that should have been in the Prequel Trilogy.
 
Threads like this remind me how thankful I am that the films are not in the hands of the fans.

Forget the prequel's divisiveness, some of the ideas floating around here would have shamed Star Wars into extinction.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Threads like this remind me how thankful I am that the films are not in the hands of the fans.

Forget the prequel's divisiveness, some of the ideas floating around here would have shamed Star Wars into extinction.

I have to agree! If the fans were in charge, we'd see something that would make what George Lucas brought us (in the PT) masterpieces.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

With all due respect, I disagree. From a storytelling standpoint, it's only important that Palpatine/Sidious is in a position of power, not how he got there. Lucas could have saved a lot of time by already having Palpatine/Sidious in power, and spent that time showing how Anakin became such a "cunning warrior" and, subsequently, how and why Vader was so feared. Instead, we got a whiny punk who appears to have decided to give himself over to the darkside almost overnight, and a brief shot of Vader standing on the bridge of a Republic Star Destroyer with his arms crossed.

I sincerely believe this is one of the reasons the animated Clone Wars series' came into existence--so that Lucas (through Lucasfilm) could finally tell at least part of the story that should have been in the Prequel Trilogy.

I agree. All three prequels revolved around Palpatine gaining power... and more power.... and guess what.. more power. It become redundant
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Politics is boring,I can see that on the news everyday and it's not what I want in a star wars movie, nuf said.When I watch the PT I find myself searching for the skip button as soon as the senate BS comes on screen.

Ben
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Politics is boring,I can see that on the news everyday and it's not what I want in a star wars movie, nuf said.When I watch the PT I find myself searching for the skip button as soon as the senate BS comes on screen.

Ben

There's plenty of good stuff out there - West Wing, Charlie Wilson's War, the UK House of Cards, The Thick of It/In the Loop, Veep...politics on screen aren't always boring. TBH, I find myself reaching for the remote when the loves scenes are happening in the prequels, doesn't mean that love stories shouldn't be told ;-)
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Anything can be interesting if just told the right way. It's like a joke... it isn't just the words or the punch-line - it is also how you deliver it. If you deliver it without passion, it will be registered as boring.

That's why pick-up lines don't work regardless. It's the way you present it, the way you deliver it, the way you make it interesting. The same words coming out of different people will be perceived completely different due to just those things.

The trick in the OT was the direction: "faster, more intense". There was just a dragging pace to nearly everything in the PT, switching to the other extreme for some of the swordfights. Extremes aren't always the best combination. That's like delivering the best pick-up line in an dispassionate way, while wearing dirty clothes and smelling like crap.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

With all due respect, I disagree. From a storytelling standpoint, it's only important that Palpatine/Sidious is in a position of power, not how he got there. Lucas could have saved a lot of time by already having Palpatine/Sidious in power, and spent that time showing how Anakin became such a "cunning warrior" and, subsequently, how and why Vader was so feared....


Except I think it's a mistake to say that the PT is Anakin's story. Certainly that's a major part, but I remember a loooooong time ago, before TPM went before the cameras, 60 minutes doing a story on the new SW movies that had been announced. They went to the ranch and talked to Lucas about what he was up to. At that time he said it was about Anakin Skywalker, and Mrs Anakin Skywalker, and how a society moves from a democracy to an empire. I think it's clear that the second part of that is REALLY what was on Lucas' mind when he decided to go ahead with the PT. Anakin is a through line for the audience, much as Luke is in SW. Also not a giant surprise when you figure that the breakdown of society and how liberators become oppressors, and how the common man can throw those oppressors off has been a recurring theme for Lucas since he started making movies.

Anakin is a hook to bring people in, but the PT is about how we got to the galaxy we find in SW - how the Jedi are eliminated, how the Empire is born. To do that you HAVE to follow Palpatine. You HAVE to see him manouevering for power. You HAVE to see that he wrests control of the senate away from the people by engineering the war and creating an environment of fear (that's something the CW cartoon is failing at I think - to understand what happens in RotS we need to see that the population of the Republic is terrified of the Separtists, and terrified of the war). Anakin is a useful tool, and a wildcard for both Sidious and the Jedi, but ultimately this is a ten year story of how Palps gets himself installed as Emperor.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

"Chewbacca didn’t get a hero’s medal at the end of Star Wars because Carrie Fisher wasn’t tall enough." Literally the only important piece of past speculation. Also the only thing in the article that I cared about.

And yet with clever editing (Star Wars Revisited), she was able to do so.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Anakin is a hook to bring people in

My favorite Oxymoron of the year. I agree that the overall intent was certainly to use him to bring people in, but for me, he was the reason I wanted out. That will be the biggest challenge for this new trilogy if it wants me to care about a character's journey. Even Luke with all his whining is still a character I can watch and enjoy.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Except I think it's a mistake to say that the PT is Anakin's story. Certainly that's a major part, but I remember a loooooong time ago, before TPM went before the cameras, 60 minutes doing a story on the new SW movies that had been announced. They went to the ranch and talked to Lucas about what he was up to. At that time he said it was about Anakin Skywalker, and Mrs Anakin Skywalker, and how a society moves from a democracy to an empire. I think it's clear that the second part of that is REALLY what was on Lucas' mind when he decided to go ahead with the PT. Anakin is a through line for the audience, much as Luke is in SW. Also not a giant surprise when you figure that the breakdown of society and how liberators become oppressors, and how the common man can throw those oppressors off has been a recurring theme for Lucas since he started making movies.

Anakin is a hook to bring people in, but the PT is about how we got to the galaxy we find in SW - how the Jedi are eliminated, how the Empire is born. To do that you HAVE to follow Palpatine. You HAVE to see him manouevering for power. You HAVE to see that he wrests control of the senate away from the people by engineering the war and creating an environment of fear (that's something the CW cartoon is failing at I think - to understand what happens in RotS we need to see that the population of the Republic is terrified of the Separtists, and terrified of the war). Anakin is a useful tool, and a wildcard for both Sidious and the Jedi, but ultimately this is a ten year story of how Palps gets himself installed as Emperor.

Bingo. Or that's what it SHOULD have been. Instead it just got muddled. I still think you could've maybe saved the bulk of the existing PT by swapping out TPM for a film in between AOTC and ROTS which showed the war, its terrible cost, and how that made Anakin determined to prevent chaos in the future BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Think of it. If you get rid of TPM altogether, then that gets rid of the abandonment issues which plague the later films. That gets rid of that entire subplot of Anakin's connection to his mother and whatnot. He's a Jedi doing a job.

In AOTC, his political commentary already lays out that he's disposed towards autocracy if it works. This ties neatly into Vader's comments in ESB. All you need to between those two is draw a straight line that shows the Clone Wars and the horrific impact they have. This could also be used to explain the gradual depopulation of Jedi, and the public's growing sense that the Jedi deserve their ultimate fate. You could show conflicts with various races in the coalition (e.g. Wookiees) to explain how certain races end up oppressed by the OT timeline. Maybe the wookiees were slow to respond to calls for troops. Maybe they backed the separatists who promised to preserve their planet from development or something (making them misled goodguys).

There's a lot that COULD have been done.


My favorite Oxymoron of the year. I agree that the overall intent was certainly to use him to bring people in, but for me, he was the reason I wanted out. That will be the biggest challenge for this new trilogy if it wants me to care about a character's journey. Even Luke with all his whining is still a character I can watch and enjoy.

Exactly. Anakin was ultimately just...not that much fun to watch, other than when he was kicking butt with his sabre. I hope the next group of heroes can draw me in.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I was talking with my cousin today, and she HATES the EU. She says that if Lucas is not involved with the Sequels then they are Expanded Universe and, to her, "not Star Wars". My gut reaction was to say they're official movies, so they are canon. Lucasfilm calls anything that Lucas personally works on as G canon (SW OT, Prequels, and Clone Wars). Then when I started thinking about it if Lucas isn't involved, Lucasfilm would call this Expanded Universe. So if Lucas has no involvement they're no different than the games or books.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Innevitably, the new star wars movies will wind up being about the new Jedi, and the reappearance of the Sith.

There will be a young jedi (most likely a skywalker), fresh out of the academy, who will find evidence of the Sith (porbably after a battle with the last Imperial Remnant), and then spend a while trying to warn everybody, including Han, Luke and Leia... Naturally, nobody will believe him, and then the Sith will attack threatening the new republic.

why?

because it's both very Star Wars, and very Disney.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Innevitably, the new star wars movies will wind up being about the new Jedi, and the reappearance of the Sith.

There will be a young jedi (most likely a skywalker), fresh out of the academy, who will find evidence of the Sith (porbably after a battle with the last Imperial Remnant), and then spend a while trying to warn everybody, including Han, Luke and Leia... Naturally, nobody will believe him, and then the Sith will attack threatening the new republic.

why?

because it's both very Star Wars, and very Disney.

Sounds better than the PT. :thumbsup
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

My favorite Oxymoron of the year. I agree that the overall intent was certainly to use him to bring people in, but for me, he was the reason I wanted out. That will be the biggest challenge for this new trilogy if it wants me to care about a character's journey. Even Luke with all his whining is still a character I can watch and enjoy.

Yeah, I agree...there's a fine line that you need to walk to make the character restless, straining against the restrictions placed on him by the dogmatic Jedi, and willing to, at the right moment, choose the Sith, without making him a whining ******. How do you make a teenager whine about authority without making them instantly unlikeable? Again, I'll argue to my demise that the story is a brilliant piece of plotting; epic, mythological, contemporary, precient, and timely. But the execution? That's the real crime in the PT - there's SUCH a compelling, intelligent story there and it got SO badly bungled that people miss what Lucas was really trying to do and write it off, a la Red Letter Media's BS 'reviews', as juvenille and nonsensical. They're not good by any stretch of the imagination, but they also certainly are not brainless fluff.

And Solo, I never really thought about it, but you're right about TPM. It's nice that it introduces us to everyone, but literally all we need to know about Palps we get in the last 5 minutes of the movie. Oh, and RLM was right about one thing - Qui Gon/Obi Wan should have been Obi Wan. Obi Wan should have been the brash, iconoclast Jedi to start, and there's no need for Qui Gon. He could have matured over the films ("Was I any different when you taught me?") into the more staid, conservative man we saw in the PT, but the middle film should have been Obi Wan having so far been an example to Anakin as to how you can take chances, and have these awesome adventures, making choices that would slowly put him at odds with that mindset and becoming a more responsible man. It gives Anakin a reason to think that it's everyone ELSE that's changed, and he's the only one fighting the good fight, while the rest won't do whatever is neccessary to win the war. THAT'S how you drive that critical wedge between them, and how to embody that contest between doing what's morally palatable and doing what's neccessary.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

So if Lucas has no involvement they're no different than the games or books.

Except that he wrote the outline and the first treatment for the new trilogy. Part of the purchase was purchasing Lucas' story. For better or worse, I think this is G Cannon (Oh man, can I change my username to 'G-Cannon'?).
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Yeah, I agree...there's a fine line that you need to walk to make the character restless, straining against the restrictions placed on him by the dogmatic Jedi, and willing to, at the right moment, choose the Sith, without making him a whining ******. How do you make a teenager whine about authority without making them instantly unlikeable? Again, I'll argue to my demise that the story is a brilliant piece of plotting; epic, mythological, contemporary, precient, and timely. But the execution? That's the real crime in the PT - there's SUCH a compelling, intelligent story there and it got SO badly bungled that people miss what Lucas was really trying to do and write it off, a la Red Letter Media's BS 'reviews', as juvenille and nonsensical. They're not good by any stretch of the imagination, but they also certainly are not brainless fluff.

I may differ with you on this point, but I appreciate what you're saying.

I think plot-wise, the overarching concepts work. You could rejigger a bunch of Lucas' ideas, and make the films leagues better. But Lucas was interested in telling a particular emotional story, and ultimately, that's what undermines the piece.

It may be that he started out without much of a plan, just knowing that Anakin would fall, but not really knowing why. And knowing he wanted to show him as a child to show he was innocent once. But, assuming he "planned it all along(TM)" then I'd say the big failing is Anakin's motivation. Anakin, as written, is essentially a petulant child with godlike powers and some serious attachment/abandonment issues.

That's it. That's what motivates him. Everything we see him do is motivated by that. In executing that, I think Lucas is largely successful. Anakin comes across as someone in need of serious couch time, who also happens to be a demi-god. Imagine an angry 11-year-old who could crush your larynx or toss a spaceship around with his mind. That's what Lucas gives us.

Now, I think you could still have changed that and told a terrific story of a man who does bad things out of good motivations, while simultaneously raising some interesting questions. The Operative in Serentiy is a good example of this. He does terrible things in the service of what he thinks is the greater good, and believes himself to be a monster. He never shows remorse, but if he did? He ain't far off from a version of Darth Vader that we never got.

Lucas does a good job of telling a story, instead, of a scared little boy who never quite emotionally evolves, and what happens when an evil man plays him like a fiddle. It's just...not a particularly interesting story (nor does it seem to track to what we saw in the OT, which strikes me more like the Operative).

I do, however, see the potential for a different story with otherwise similar plot points actually working.

And Solo, I never really thought about it, but you're right about TPM. It's nice that it introduces us to everyone, but literally all we need to know about Palps we get in the last 5 minutes of the movie. Oh, and RLM was right about one thing - Qui Gon/Obi Wan should have been Obi Wan. Obi Wan should have been the brash, iconoclast Jedi to start, and there's no need for Qui Gon. He could have matured over the films ("Was I any different when you taught me?") into the more staid, conservative man we saw in the PT, but the middle film should have been Obi Wan having so far been an example to Anakin as to how you can take chances, and have these awesome adventures, making choices that would slowly put him at odds with that mindset and becoming a more responsible man. It gives Anakin a reason to think that it's everyone ELSE that's changed, and he's the only one fighting the good fight, while the rest won't do whatever is neccessary to win the war. THAT'S how you drive that critical wedge between them, and how to embody that contest between doing what's morally palatable and doing what's neccessary.

I've said for years that you could sum up all of TPM in the elevator ride at the start of AOTC. Literally. Or you could spread it out with a bit of exposition throughout AOTC, with bits from different characters. And no need for Qui-Gon, like you said -- just Obi-Wan, trained by Yoda, who thought he could train Anakin better and blew it with his maverick ways.

Oops.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

It would have been much simpler, you'd think anyhow, to make anakin a rule breaker as opposed to a collassal whiner. Instead of 'but why can't I do <whatever>' just nod and then do it anyhow. Go brash and bold, and have it work. It then inflates his ego and makes him do it more because it always works. That'd make it very easy to pull him to the dark side and make him the feared vader.

I can't really go from whiny <bleep> to vader in E3. There just two separate people. I don't know anyone who feared anakin. Whiny <bleep> != evil badass
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

It would have been much simpler, you'd think anyhow, to make Anakin a rule breaker as opposed to a colossal whiner. Instead of 'but why can't I do <whatever>' just nod and then do it anyhow. Go brash and bold, and have it work. It then inflates his ego and makes him do it more because it always works. That'd make it very easy to pull him to the dark side and make him the feared Vader.

I can't really go from whiny <bleep> to Vader in E3. There just two separate people. I don't know anyone who feared Anakin. Whiny <bleep> != evil badass

That's sort of the way they portray him in the Clone Wars animated series, he really doesn't whine much and constantly bends or breaks the rules, much to Obi-Wan's dismay and distress.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

That's sort of the way they portray him in the Clone Wars animated series, he really doesn't whine much and constantly bends or breaks the rules, much to Obi-Wan's dismay and distress.

And it's better than the prequels.

No or limited Lucas involvement = better product.
 
Back
Top