KrangPrime
Master Member
FYI, rifftrax is doing a kickstarter where on e of the reward unlockables is a TFA commentary ;o)
I saw all these movies when they first came out and I think I was 13 when ROTJ came out. And even then as Vader picked up the Emperor for his, "Surf's up, pal!" scene, I thought to myself immediately, "Seriously? This is the same guy who choked out Admirals when their performance rating was just under par?" I never bought into that scene.Vader wasn't conflicted until the very end...not exactly a pattern there. He was a stone cold killer through all of ANH and ESB. It was only when Luke began to tell him that he could sense the good in him--and really when it came to it and the Emperor was killing his own son in front of him--that Vader showed any conflict. He kept telling the Emperor (and us) that there "Is NO conflict".
Maul was the most underused bad guy in sci-fi history. They could (and should) have developed him throughout the prequels, ending up with him in the Dooku role at the end of episode 3...Maul was no more extreme than any other Sith... it's what the Sith do: magnify only the Dark Side. Honestly, we got ZERO character development for Maul. He only spoke one line of dialog. We know he was good with a saber, but that's about it.
Maul was the most underused bad guy in sci-fi history. They could (and should) have developed him throughout the prequels, ending up with him in the Dooku role at the end of episode 3...
No, I was totally serious. The choreography is so flourished that looking at it with any amount of criticism shows that the fight is complete rubbish. It's 3 dudes dancing around like some sort of laser ballet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0mUVY9fLlw
If the number of innocents that Kylo Ren kills without remorse or regret isn't enough to be a part of the dark side, than what's the point?. So he killed Han. Ok. I guess that means he won't feel bad about killing more innocent people now? See how I'm having a hard time seeing this as a 'transformation'? What's the difference?
The only problem with that is Vader did far worse over the course of what? 25-30 years? and Ren's done some bad, killed people and his father - but still not remotely as far gone as vader was. Vader had no family whatsoever...no father and his mother died when he was 16-18 or so. So he had even less to be attached too (Ren still has his mother for one). Not to mention he killed the remaining jedi - including a temple full of CHILDREN - and thought he essentially killed off his own son (when luke dropped off the bespin spire). No way at all that Ren's farther gone than vader. None at all.
The upshot of Jedi becomes, you can be redeemed from damn near anything you've done.
.
The only problem with that is Vader did far worse over the course of what? 25-30 years? and Ren's done some bad, killed people and his father - but still not remotely as far gone as vader was. Vader had no family whatsoever...no father and his mother died when he was 16-18 or so. So he had even less to be attached too (Ren still has his mother for one). Not to mention he killed the remaining jedi - including a temple full of CHILDREN - and thought he essentially killed off his own son (when luke dropped off the bespin spire). No way at all that Ren's farther gone than vader. None at all.
The upshot of Jedi becomes, you can be redeemed from damn near anything you've done.
Now, that's not to say Ren can't go on to be as evil, but i don't think that happens with his mother still out there. Either way i find it nearly impossible for him to exceed vader in the evil category.
I saw all these movies when they first came out and I think I was 13 when ROTJ came out. And even then as Vader picked up the Emperor for his, "Surf's up, pal!" scene, I thought to myself immediately, "Seriously? This is the same guy who choked out Admirals when their performance rating was just under par?" I never bought into that scene.
Agreed. And had Dooku replace Grievous. I simply refuse to buy that anyone not trained in the Force could have anything on a Jedi, regardless of how many sabers he wielded. A Jedi would simply Force lift him off the floor, cut his silly robotic arms off and that would be the end of that character. Having him best any Jedi weakened their credibility and abilities when we have seen what they can do.
I agree. As much as I like Christopher Lee, I think Dooku was a wasted character in the Prequel movies--he didn't do much, and wasn't particularly effective as a "villain"; the same could be said of Grievous. Maul should have been Sidious' #2 throughout the Prequel Trilogy, and should finally have been eliminated by Obi-Wan in Episode III....Maul was the most underused bad guy in sci-fi history. They could (and should) have developed him throughout the prequels, ending up with him in the Dooku role at the end of episode 3...
... the same could be said of Grievous. ...
...You could be a mass murderer in the star wars galaxy..but people are so used to seeing that, it's like... 'OK, there's SOME good in him.......we'll ignore that he killed thousands... come home.. your room is still the same, I'll wake you up for school just like I used to...it'll all be ok...'