CT1138
Sr Member
IDK if his suit is completely "sealed" though I suppose the argument can be made that his helmet definitely is. I can't speak to the comics and games, but in Rebels, the area around his mouth and nose are still intact, so I've always assumed that he could still breath.Of course but that's not what we're referring to. Numerous times now in comics, video games and even in the Rebels TV show, we see a "battledamaged" Vader, usually with helmet destroyed and face partially revealed to dramatic effect, suit in tatters. This has always been incredibly cheesy to me. I know it's done "because it's like cool man", but as far as I'm concerned, the suit should be far more resilient than depicted in these cases and Vader should be in a bad way if it somehow ever was damaged to the extent that is sometimes shown. It is a life support suit with all kinds of technology and medical aids built into it. Vader should be strangling to death in a heap if this sealed suit is compromised as is sometimes depicted, rather than continuing on somehow unscathed.
Dude, you're reading way too much into what I wrote. I'm just stating events that occurred, and giving my interpretation of psychological motivations behind them.I see what you did there. You had to justify everything with the ST and so forth. That is a huge stretch and using assumptions and reading between lines in order to justify retconing the characters. So you say, some responded this way and that and yet some how 100% of them all have PTSD...in different ways. That seems very intentional if you ask me and there's an agenda behind it. I get it...let the past die...kill it if you must. That is why nothing today or very little will stand the test of time for quality in story telling because " everybody is a victim and whoa is me and its everybody else's fault and it's not my fault for my choices and everyone gets a trophy". We will call everything PTSD then which will water it down( just like they are doing with the OT characters) reducing it to an excuse to the detriment of those that ACTUALLY have it for real. Everyone who disagrees is " toxic" Everyone who dislikes how an actor performs is a " racist" . If you dislike how a show is written or produced you're not a " real fan". There is no good and evil...it's all grey. Goodness gracious. If one thing we all seem to be professionals at is justifying are endless excuses about why we do what we do without taking personal responsibilities yet we somehow are experts at why fictional characters are written poorly. The OT wasn't good enough? The characters needed further exploration? The story shouldn't end? Explain to us why then. It sure felt complete to me. What has been added to any of the character's arc that gives them any more gravitas than what they originally had and did it add any gravitas to the original story itself ? Answer...no, if anything it takes away and undermines it. " Well , he has PTSD...yeah...that's it..PTSD, I tell you...such a toxic series of unfortunate events and he had to give up his life for little Luke's sake..." Poor, poor Obi-Wan...he needs guidance from his PTSD by the help of a little girl and get back on track in his life because of all the trauma he's been through" ....please!!
Luke went into self-imposed exile just like Obi-Wan did.
Han went back to a life of crime (smuggling is a criminal activity, no matter how romanticized SW makes it)
Leia started up a paramilitarist group to fight the First Order.
These are events that happened. Stating that they happened (and the stated reasons for why) isn't "justifying" anything.
Obi-Wan's trauma was going to be a topic of this show. We knew that before we knew anything else about it. I don't know why everyone is acting surprised that it's a discussion point.