Because, you know, that second one really looks purposeful.
Hehe. Did you see the movie?
Because, you know, that second one really looks purposeful.
Hehe. Did you see the movie?
Yep. Five times now. And I had seen it when I posted that quote you pettily went back to dig up.
Sure played like an act of desperation to me.
I haven't seen this yet, but did snoop around in the spoilers thread. Don't know if I should drop $5.00 on it or wait until the DVD comes out in a few weeks!
Deciding to not see a film because of spoilers you've read is like deciding to not listen to a song because someone told you a few of the notes.
Unless it's from an artist you're not a big fan of to begin with....
I stand behind my analogy.
Even if your "not a big fan" of an artist," and someone tells you a few notes of their new song ... what does that tell you about how they are used in the song? Nothing.
Raw spoiler statemtents will NEVER reflect their context in a visual narrative.
OK, I have to admit, this was funny!
http://io9.com/star-trek-into-darkness-the-spoiler-faq-508927844
True, but it was a funny depressing account of how un-original, un-intelligent, and trite the nu-Trek is.You say funny, I say depressing account of how un-original, un-intelligent and trite the nu-trek is.
Deciding to not see a film because of spoilers you've read is like deciding to not listen to a song because someone told you a few of the notes.
What if it's Justin Beaver doing a Beatles toon - he changed a few words too just to "keep it relatable".
True, but it was a funny depressing account of how un-original, un-intelligent, and trite the nu-Trek is.![]()
Who's Justin Beaver and why is he doing a Beatles cartoon?What if it's Justin Beaver doing a Beatles toon...