ilikecomicstoo
New Member
But this isn't Nike. And he wasn't being paid to advertise, he was paid for a service and merchandise he supplied to them. If they continue to do business with him, I completely agree and would blacklist them as a personal choice, just as it's anybody's prerogative to not do business with BITS because of their involvement with Logan.
I guess I'm curious exactly what people expect BITS to do now, and more importantly, how that is going to get anyone here reimbursed by Jim Logan.
No one is expecting that BitS' involvement or non-involvement will get victims reimbursed.
At this point, it seems like the project had already commissioned "Jim" for several items before they became informed of his behavior. And while their statement was disappointing given the obvious evidence piled against him, I would understand if they chose to use the items they likely already paid for. Given their recent responses, I'm inclined to believe they are actually distancing themselves from him.
However, if they continue to hire him or promote his work moving forward as he continues to damage the community and keep customers' money, then that's wrong on a moral level. We spread the word about BitS' involvement with this character because it's a project that many people enjoy, and they're entitled to understand if the people behind it are encouraging someone who's happily stolen nearly $10,000 from fans. You have to understand that a number of individuals commissioned Logan because they'd seen his involvement with the project. It's something both parties had openly advertised in the past.