Woah—what???
350 scale Grissom??
Outstanding!!
As weird as the number sounded, the 1/537 Enterprise always felt like a decent size.Agreed! At 1/1000 it was just too small.
My pics are cropped from a 720p FB video, haven't seen many photos yet.At least I will be in for the 1/48 Hawk and 1/350 Grissom. The rest meh.
Whomever is taking those pictures, makes me look like a good photographer! (although I am grateful that there are pictures, at least)![]()
Just teasing. Kind of thought that was the case. I just want to be able to see the subjects better.My pics are cropped from a 720p FB video, haven't seen many photos yet.
Doesn't say anything about the engine deck
Sure that's not just the new 1/1000 they announced a while ago?Can anyone tell what size that Voyager is behind the Grissom? It looks like it might be a solo re-pop of the 1:1400 scale one that was in the Voyager 3-Ship Set.
Can anyone tell what size that Voyager is behind the Grissom? It looks like it might be a solo re-pop of the 1:1400 scale one that was in the Voyager 3-Ship Set.
Funny thing is, their Star Trek product line's suffering from the opposite problem, with 1/1000 being too small. Guess they're trying to avoid making the same mistake.I love the questionnaire on the table: How big is too big? If Round2 were to create a(sic) large format Star Wars model kits, how big would we go? Big (1/32 scale) or Real Big (1/24 studio scale)
Funny thing is, their Star Trek product line's suffering from the opposite problem, with 1/1000 being too small. Guess they're trying to avoid making the same mistake.
Looks like 1/1000.Can anyone tell what size that Voyager is behind the Grissom? It looks like it might be a solo re-pop of the 1:1400 scale one that was in the Voyager 3-Ship Set.