RED ALERT Lost 3 ft TOS Enterprise found????

Personally, I think the way the nacelles are mounted on the 11-footer is actually more aesthetically pleasing. It’s a subtle difference, though. And the 11-footer’s saucer skews closer to Jefferies’ plans, as opposed to the flatter saucer of the 33-inch model. But neither model has the curvier secondary hull seen in Jefferies’ various drawings, which is something that would have been difficult to achieve with a lathe.
But the engineering hull was built like a barrel, and those are pretty darned curved. Plus, you can go pretty damned curvy on a lathe...I've done it.
 
hello I arrived late to the party

It seems everyone who examined the photos from ebay agree it IS it.

am I right there is no hard news after the auction was taken down?
 
Top-tier site/research.

It was especially nice to see them debunking all of "Cash Markman's" claims.


I swear, more than any other franchise, STAR TREK seems plagued by scammers, grifters, weirdos, and people who pollute the factual record with lies and urban legends.
I was looking for Maurice’s site where he talks about Star Trek - is it facttrek.com?
 
Yup no news. Pretty sure at this point the storage unit guy is gonna put this in a consignment auction. He's not gonna let it go for a little cash. He wants at least 1 million I bet...
If Rod Roddenberry has decent legal representation, and I have no reason to believe he wouldn't, the person currently in possession would already have been served with a cease and desist letter directing them to do nothing with the model until it is authenticated and legal ownership is determined. If they are any good at all, they would get cease and desist orders/injunction legally prohibiting them from selling the model until legal ownership is determined.

There is abundant reason to believe the model is the one Gene Roddenberry lent to the studio which subsequently went missing/was stolen. As such, the Roddenberry estate/heirs are the legal owners of the model and attempting to sell or purchase it without their authorization is trafficking in stolen goods. For an artifact of such significance and potential value in the millions of dollars, the penalties could be severe. There's no statute of limitations for legal ownership and, while often required for insurance purposes and useful in theft claims, a report to law enforcement isn't required to prove that the item was stolen.

At this point, anyone who could reasonably authenticate the model for an auction house or consignment seller is also certainly aware of its history and any reputable agency wouldn't touch it until the legal issues are sorted out. If the person currently in possession actually did something so mind-bogglingly stupid as to sell it in some kind of black market deal, they almost certainly wouldn't get to enjoy the fruits of that deal, as the subsequent lawsuit and possible criminal proceedings would probably use it all up and then some. I can't imagine someone with the scratch to buy the model would want to get tangled up in this nonsense, either.

Then again, people get really stupid when money is involved.
 
If Rod Roddenberry has decent legal representation, and I have no reason to believe he wouldn't, the person currently in possession would already have been served with a cease and desist letter directing them to do nothing with the model until it is authenticated and legal ownership is determined. If they are any good at all, they would get cease and desist orders/injunction legally prohibiting them from selling the model until legal ownership is determined.

There is abundant reason to believe the model is the one Gene Roddenberry lent to the studio which subsequently went missing/was stolen. As such, the Roddenberry estate/heirs are the legal owners of the model and attempting to sell or purchase it without their authorization is trafficking in stolen goods. For an artifact of such significance and potential value in the millions of dollars, the penalties could be severe. There's no statute of limitations for legal ownership and, while often required for insurance purposes and useful in theft claims, a report to law enforcement isn't required to prove that the item was stolen.

At this point, anyone who could reasonably authenticate the model for an auction house or consignment seller is also certainly aware of its history and any reputable agency wouldn't touch it until the legal issues are sorted out. If the person currently in possession actually did something so mind-bogglingly stupid as to sell it in some kind of black market deal, they almost certainly wouldn't get to enjoy the fruits of that deal, as the subsequent lawsuit and possible criminal proceedings would probably use it all up and then some. I can't imagine someone with the scratch to buy the model would want to get tangled up in this nonsense, either.

Then again, people get really stupid when money is involved.
Agree. Though I also am reminded of the stolen Gardner Museum paintings, which still haven't surfaced after 30+ years and are worth half a billion dollars. Greed has no limit.
 
Oil sheiks get tigers, harems, etc.
I can just see this model overseas used as target practice for the bored rich and their AK-47s.

The storage unit was, what? An hour's drive to Mexico?

No country for old trekkies.

Where is my bottle of compressed air....
 
I swear, more than any other franchise, STAR TREK seems plagued by scammers, grifters, weirdos, and people who pollute the factual record with lies and urban legends.
Maybe that's just because the fandom is so large and long-established. But there's sure a lot of weirdos amongst the wonderful people. One thing we find hilarious is the sense of entitlement we see even in Trek fanzines from when the show was on the air. That's been there practically from day one.

One problem we've seen is that many Trek-adjacent people have a financial stake, and it's more profitable to pander than dig up sometimes uncomfortable truths. Also, most Trek experts and faux-historians have no standards for assessing information and don't understand that you can't take anything anyone connected to shows says at face value, because human memory is faulty, and oft-told tales evolve. As Nolan Bushnell said at an event I attended, "The stories get better the more I tell them."

You should have seen us squirming in our seats watching the first episode of "The Center Seat."


Back to the topic of the model, I emailed back and forth with Richard Datin around 1995, not realizing how close he lived to me. Had I realized I would have tried to meet him and do an in-depth interview. Alas!
 
You should have seen us squirming in our seats watching the first episode of "The Center Seat."

I have no doubt. Literally the only reason I bought the physical media release was for the PHASE II screen-test footage and other rare clips and bits. The rest is cringe and useless.
 
If Rod Roddenberry has decent legal representation, and I have no reason to believe he wouldn't, the person currently in possession would already have been served with a cease and desist letter directing them to do nothing with the model until it is authenticated and legal ownership is determined. If they are any good at all, they would get cease and desist orders/injunction legally prohibiting them from selling the model until legal ownership is determined.

There is abundant reason to believe the model is the one Gene Roddenberry lent to the studio which subsequently went missing/was stolen. As such, the Roddenberry estate/heirs are the legal owners of the model and attempting to sell or purchase it without their authorization is trafficking in stolen goods. For an artifact of such significance and potential value in the millions of dollars, the penalties could be severe. There's no statute of limitations for legal ownership and, while often required for insurance purposes and useful in theft claims, a report to law enforcement isn't required to prove that the item was stolen.

At this point, anyone who could reasonably authenticate the model for an auction house or consignment seller is also certainly aware of its history and any reputable agency wouldn't touch it until the legal issues are sorted out. If the person currently in possession actually did something so mind-bogglingly stupid as to sell it in some kind of black market deal, they almost certainly wouldn't get to enjoy the fruits of that deal, as the subsequent lawsuit and possible criminal proceedings would probably use it all up and then some. I can't imagine someone with the scratch to buy the model would want to get tangled up in this nonsense, either.

Then again, people get really stupid when money is involved.

I'm guessing that people are wrong on the whole stolen merchandise thing. I would think at this point if the people this guy handed it over to was the Roddenberrys we would have heard by now. I'm thinking he has some right to it. The laws vary in states as well... somehow really knows. But one thing is for sure this guy is not gonna let it go easily without a windfall....
 
Back
Top