robstyle
Master Member
i always wondered why they didn't do exactly that with both films. shoot on old cheap stock with a small production kit, run the final cut through a scuzzy projector a few hundred times, strike four or five generations of cheap prints, damage the film, slice and dice a few scenes, rub in some dirt, etc. it seems they took the backwards way of going about it.
that's not to say that i dislike qt, though. i loved inglorious basterds.
Its simple, those old camera systems would never hold up to the abuse of filming much less lenses, lighting.... Cameras these days can basically be operated by anyone that knows how to work a home video camera. They are small, reliable and have less moving mechanical parts. You have instant playback, real time viewing and can rough edit on the fly as well as color correct and all that fun stuff.
For a great example of why not to do film with in camera "effects", look at Terminator Salvation. Everyone has super bright pearly whites due to the added chemicals in the film stock that was used to get the washed out look.