Origins of the ROTJ Vader helmets: JY thread continuation

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not the fact he said Brian maybe offering a run it's the fact that he alluded that Brian is making up provenence in order to sell helmets at an inflated price, that's the real accusation, he shouldn't be making Brians private busines public at all and if he's going to make claims that Brian is making up or wrong about the origins of his helmet he should back that up with some kind of reasoning which he hasn't.
Now why is it some people get infraction points and their threads locked for questioning the origins of GINO's helmets(if i remember correctly you were very vocal yourself in saying how out of order it was to question GINO in that thread) and yet GINO is free to make claims and basically call someone dishonest and get a free pass ?

You don't see that as double standards ?

All those words and you STILL miss the point. If ANYTHING GINO said was DISHONEST, then yes, he was VERY wrong. Brian has still yet to refute his claims. It's as simple as saying "Hey, I am not selling copies of my helmet." Hell, we already have Brian saying it could well have been an old mold, but since it was a mold used during RotJ, it is a RotJ mold. His helmet came from that mold. We can take this at face value, right? What does that do to the value of this helmet? Would that helmet be worth more than one I reworked from a different helmet? You're gawdamn right it would. So, that said, how is GINO wrong?

Look, I am not saying Brian is an Ainsworth, not for one minute. Ainsworth was a glorified pair of vacuum forming hands. If it wasn't a pond, he was not scultping it. Brian has a long and prolific career in the film industry. This is apples and oranges.

Here is the thing, and this JUST dawned on me. Brian will NEVER confirm, nor deny, any sale of casts of a Darth Vader helmet. THAT is why, if he IS selling that helmet, he is doing it behind the scenes. He has a hell of a lot to lose by doing that...not saying he is. He proved he did not know where the mold for the helmet he has came from. The only thing we know for sure is some friend of his who was in production on RotJ pulled that beat up turd of a helmet and gave it to the original sculptor.

Skynet, what you said, I can get behind 110%. If you cannot back up your statements, keep them to yourself.
 
Artisan Props you know what I see, I see the same gino fan club defending the guy in every single thread he posts in that turns south because of the way he communicates with people. He doesn't play nice and that is all part of his sick game. You'll probably join the other team when he grows tired of you and stabs you in the back too. That's how gino plays his game.
 
All those words and you STILL miss the point. If ANYTHING GINO said was DISHONEST, then yes, he was VERY wrong. Brian has still yet to refute his claims. It's as simple as saying "Hey, I am not selling copies of my helmet." Hell, we already have Brian saying it could well have been an old mold, but since it was a mold used during RotJ, it is a RotJ mold. His helmet came from that mold. We can take this at face value, right? What does that do to the value of this helmet? Would that helmet be worth more than one I reworked from a different helmet? You're gawdamn right it would. So, that said, how is GINO wrong?

Look, I am not saying Brian is an Ainsworth, not for one minute. Ainsworth was a glorified pair of vacuum forming hands. If it wasn't a pond, he was not scultping it. Brian has a long and prolific career in the film industry. This is apples and oranges.

Here is the thing, and this JUST dawned on me. Brian will NEVER confirm, nor deny, any sale of casts of a Darth Vader helmet. THAT is why, if he IS selling that helmet, he is doing it behind the scenes. He has a hell of a lot to lose by doing that...not saying he is. He proved he did not know where the mold for the helmet he has came from. The only thing we know for sure is some friend of his who was in production on RotJ pulled that beat up turd of a helmet and gave it to the original sculptor.

Skynet, what you said, I can get behind 110%. If you cannot back up your statements, keep them to yourself.

No you mised the point, GINO alluded that Brian was dishonest about the origin of his helmet in order that he could sell copies at an inflated price.
Whether Brian is or is not selling helmets is not the issue the issue is that GINO made out he was selling them at high prices with false provenence.
Is that few enough words ?
 
Skynet, what you said, I can get behind 110%. If you cannot back up your statements, keep them to yourself.

Exactly so the subject of a supposed run and backing up statements Gino stated he had 'three independent sources' telling him of this run.

I asked a direct question to Gino to name these sources - I didn't expect it to be answered - and it wasn't.

Basically Gino says his 3 sources say there is a list for a run being gathered so therefore hypothetically -

1. Gino has three independent sources - who by breaking their word on keeping the run private so are untrustworthy and liars making Gino an associate of these people.

2. Gino has been lied to about a list for a run making his trusted associates untrustworthy and liars.

3. There are no sources and this story of a run has been fabricated to add weight to an argument that Brian has something to gain.

No matter what the scenario I would still appreciate an answer on who Gino's sources are or without any backing up of such a claim I personally am treating his 'statement' as a total fabrication.


I would also like to add a response on some comments made through the thread relating to Brian's memory on his work on Star Wars. When Brian was giving evidence in the Andrew Ainsworth trial his memory was worth it's weight in gold to the same people who doubt it now - what has changed?

The very carefully worded likening of Brian Muir to Andrew Ainsworth was just utterly ridiculous as well. I haven't seen AA on this or any other public forum willing to speak to fans. As far as I am aware Brian is the only person on this forum who worked on Star Wars and has shared knowledge and photographs - his photos of the pre-production stormtrooper spring to mind.

Chris
 
Take the information at what it's worth and move the hell on....

WHERE is this "information" from Gino? More than 60 pages now and I simply haven't found ANY information!

Is "believe me or not" an information?

Haven't any of you learned that persuing Gino with the same old fight only ruins the thead for everybody? Take your argument to PM so the rest of us can continue the discussion unabated....

Is it that this helmet was discussed when suddenly the storm broke loose on poor Gino without any reason or is it that this thread started because of Gino's unbacked statements?

Be honest...

One more thing I notice, is how some of you think gino is disrespectful, but in the same voice you put the Mods of this forum down for allowing Gino to share his thoughts.....

His what??? You're serious?

This is going in circles on and on and on....where are these thoughts?

The only thoughts I've read so fare are "believe me or not" or "I know I am right". NO PROVE whatsoever.

This has nothing to do with backstabbing!

I don't know GINO. I never had business with GINO. I wasn't even in contact anyhow with this man! I have NO reason for backstabbing Gino in any way.

I just make comments on what I read since I am interested in this very topic: Is there a new mold for ROTJ (or a new helmet) or not?
 
Where on Earth are you reading this? I do not see any post that says Brian is lying. He says Brian bolstered the origin of his helmet. This is a factual statement. Brian did do that very thing by saying his friend who was in production on RotJ cast that helmet from molds used to cast 2 or 3 RotJ helmets.

GINO also stated that there were no new molds made for RotJ. Brian pretty much left this one alone with the quoted text I posted earlier. He said, and I am paraphrasing, that if that mold, no matter how old, was used to make a RotJ screen helmet, then it was a RotJ mold.

The ONE statement that should NOT have been made by GINO is about Brian selling HIS helmet. We do not know if this is true or not. Neither side is going to reveal sources, or if it is true or false with any clarity.

Set aside the GINO hatred and read what was ACTUALLY posted.
 
Exactly so the subject of a supposed run and backing up statements Gino stated he had 'three independent sources' telling him of this run.
Another option:

If there was a private run and 3 people were concerned with the pedigree of the helmet being offered they might ask an outside source like Gino.

I would also like to add a response on some comments made through the thread relating to Brian's memory on his work on Star Wars. When Brian was giving evidence in the Andrew Ainsworth trial his memory was worth it's weight in gold to the same people who doubt it now - what has changed?

As I understand it, it's not Brian's word at all it's his friend's claims.

Wasn't SL's source (Someone who also worked on ROTJ) proven wrong in a very similar scenario?
 
Last edited:
Artisan Props you know what I see, I see the same gino fan club defending the guy in every single thread he posts in that turns south because of the way he communicates with people. He doesn't play nice and that is all part of his sick game. You'll probably join the other team when he grows tired of you and stabs you in the back too. That's how gino plays his game.

Fan Club? I'm not a fan of anybody's club. I just call it like I see it..

So because I don't agree with you or the likes of you, that makes me a Gino
supporter? That's a pretty sad way of thinking, and exactly the remark I was
expecting.. Typical and unoriginal at best! :thumbsdown
 
He says Brian bolstered the origin of his helmet. This is a factual statement. Brian did do that very thing by saying his friend who was in production on RotJ cast that helmet from molds used to cast 2 or 3 RotJ helmets.

If we take it as a fact (I wasn't there when Brian was told so) that this helmet was taken from a ROTJ mold by a friend who was there during production:

Is this "bolstering up"? Only because Brian told us what he knows? So anyone in the future, who claims that a piece of his collection comes from a screenused mold is "bolstering up" his piece because he plans a run???

No matter if this story about a secret interest list is true or not:

Who cares? This list - if it exists - is private anyway. These interested people can do whatever they want with their money. Sure, forewarned is forearmed, but leave this "secret list" crap aside!

Where is the proof that there is no new ROTJ mold? That is the damn topic! And where are Gino's invaluable informations regarding if there is a ROTJ mold or not? I DON'T SEE THEM!
 
If we take it as a fact (I wasn't there when Brian was told so) that this helmet was taken from a ROTJ mold by a friend who was there during production:

Is this "bolstering up"? Only because Brian told us what he knows? So anyone in the future, who claims that a piece of his collection comes from a screenused mold is "bolstering up" his piece because he plans a run???

Yes it does drive up the price. I believe the SL went for $6000 on eBay. That one or another Thomas bought. That should be common sense, man. Provenance of a piece, even if it is from a screen mold and not used in production, will drive the dollar amount MUCH higher.

As to the "no new molds" thing, even Brian could not refute that. Look, the topic that was brought up was not a list. People are saying one member lied but never once made the statements he is accused of. Simple as that.

You're laughing about all of this, aren't you, Brian? :p
 
The ONE statement that should NOT have been made by GINO is about Brian selling HIS helmet.

Bang on the money - private off the forum discussions should stay off the forums unless the people participating want to make it public.

This isn't a Gino thing for me as I do not have bad relations with him I certainly do not hate anyone in the hobby. If this had been any other forum member who had made a claim about this they would still be getting the same question from me.

Chris
 
Sure it DOES drive up the price. I never denied that?

But you don't seem to get my point (speaking german as a native language can be such a curse):

Is Brian's intention to bolster up the price by giving this statement about this friend or is it just a simple statement because he was asked where the helmet came from?

You can see it double sided...and Gino took one side, the negative side of it.

And I know what the topic is, as you can see I am one of those who wait for the answer.
 
I have missed the last few days of this thread and it has descended rather low very quickly.




Who are those 3 sources? If Brian was having a 'private' interest list it couldn't have been that private if 3 people told you about it. This would make these people untrustworthy. If it was a private list I am sure they must have agreed to secrecy which would also make them liars.

Name them please we do not need people like them in our community.

Surely you wouldn't have anything to do with such people?

If there was a private interest list did it not occur to you Gino that you maybe should respect that privacy and not post it up on a public forum?

Chris

Very well said Chris and if I may here's my two cents.

This is the only comment I will make in this thread.
After reading though all of this, one thing is very clear. We are at a stalemate. Gino made a comment about no new helmets for ROTJ, Brian Muir comes forward with a casting stating it was taken at the time of ROTJ from ROTJ molds. At this point it is irrelevant who you believe. If Brian Muir was planning a run, Gino's comments would conceiveably have destroyed any chance of that happening or at least brought a question mark to those involved. What is odd though is that Gino had made his comments reference no new helmets for ROTJ well before Brian Muir even showed off his helmet, so my guess is that if there was a run planned those people would have already known Gino's stance on the matter and didn't care so Gino pointing it out now would have had, I would imagine, very little impact to those involved.

So then you have to question Gino's motives for doing what he did. Ok so he came forward with info that there was a planned run and that Brian Muir was fabricating the info on the helmet to bolster it's price and sales. Ok, so let's say for the sake of argument that Gino was genuinely concerned about the community. Yes, I know it sounds crazy that he would care about anyone else, but hypothetically speaking let's say he did it so that no one would be taken by Brian Muir. Which again, I point out that Gino's info had already been said way before Brian showed off his helmet and I'm going to assume that those in the planned run would have been somewhat knowledgeable about Gino and what his stance is on vader related info. Gino makes a claim about ROTJ helmets he says is true and Brian Muir makes a statement about where his helmet came from which he believes to be true. Again, a stalemate. Who's to say they both aren't right? If each believes what was told to them, then it's up to us as members to believe one or the other. They can both be wrong or they can both be right or one is right and the other wrong. Brian makes a claim that contradicts Gino's, Gino comes out and says it's fabricated so that you can make a quick buck and I have 3 sources that verified this. Simple enough, but here's where I have a problem with it. Hypothetically, if a run was planned "privately" then that means that the people on the list were sworn to secercy. They were approached by whatever means, told about a run and they were trusted to keep their mouths shut about it. Gino states that not 1, not 2, but 3 people came and told him. Hmmm, that seems very suspicious to me, but we do have people in the community that are untrustworthy and dishonest. Time and time again, I log in only to find a "Hey, this guy recast my stuff" or "Hey this guy screwed me over" or "Hey this guy isn't responding to me after 1 year" etc and on and so on. Every single time I read about guys saying, man if I only knew or why doesn't the RPF have a sort of list that we can view or something to help us out. Then the thread is kept alive for weeks, months, years etc and you start to feel for the guys involved.

So here we have 3 people, according to Gino, who betrayed a trust, a confidence and went and told him about this private planned run AND Gino isn't going to give them up? I don't know about any of you and what do we have like 6,000 members now, but I sure as hell don't want to ever deal with anyone who would be untrustworthy and dishonest. A man has to have his word or he is nothing at all. This is bigger than Brian and Gino and certainly bigger than any ROTJ claims by either of them. These 3 guys/girls could cause a lot of problems. Imagine one of you going with them with private info, pics, runs etc only to later find out they betrayed you or worse.

So I ask the staff of the RPF who are friends with Gino, to have him come forward publicly with the names of these people. I don't always agree with the staff here, but I believe they have our best interests as members at heart. I would hope that Gino didn't just lie about this because Brian Muir's comments contradicted his own. I will give Gino the benefit of the doubt on this one and I hope he is telling the truth. If Gino doesn't come forward, then I hope the 3 people responsible for all of this have the balls to come forward and say they were the ones who broke the trust. Like I said, both Gino and Muir could be right about what they believe, so absent any proof on that, it's a stalemate. The trust issue amongst those 3 are a huge concern for me and I would hope the rest of the community, the RPF staff and Gino.
 
Another option: If there was a private run and 3 people were concerned with the pedigree of the helmet being offered they might ask an outside source like Gino.

Hi lonepigeon,

The helmet had been shown on public forums there would be no need to mention anything about any run. They could quite simply have asked about the pedigree of the helmet as a stand alone question without mention of anything else.

Chris
 
WHERE is this "information" from Gino? More than 60 pages now and I simply haven't found ANY information!

Is "believe me or not" an information?


OK! so out of those 60 pages where has anyone else offered up anything worth
a damn? It's all opinion based on photo comparisons, not fact.. Having said that..
why aren't you hounding anyone else about proving their said facts? Why just
Gino?

I'll tell you why! It's because you, like the usual bunch of haters, have something
against Gino and can't for whatever reason just ignore his statement and
continue on. No, you have to badger him to the point that the thread is
a pointless and useless bunch of crap AND if anyone tells you guys to just
ignore him (like I've been seeing) you somehow flip it around to where
anyone not agreeing with you on your stance must be a Gino fan..
 
OK! so out of those 60 pages where has anyone else offered up anything worth
a damn? It's all opinion based on photo comparisons, not fact.. Having said that..
why aren't you hounding anyone else about proving their said facts? Why just
Gino?

Life's too short to hate someone who hasn't treated me in a wrong or rude way.

You contradict yourself btw...

First you said he provided information. Now you say I should ignore him. Can you please tell me what to do?

I don't take Mr Muirs words as gospel! But Mr. Muir provided AT LEAST the story of his friend who told him about the ROTJ mold.

I can't and I WON'T say that this is true/untrue, but at least it is something.

From Gino...there's not even something! There is only believe me or not and I don't see anything usable out of this "believe me or not".

Can we please stop categorize the people here in "Gino Lovers" and "Gino Haters"???

This thread mutated into something which reduced itself to the person of Gino and that's sad.

I don't want to ignore him, why should I??? Did I insult him? Did I say he is lying?

This thread is one of the reasons why i registered here: in order to gather information and to have fun!

But I don't find the information in this thread! Only two people making claims (but one of them at least has the little more backed up claim).
 
What is odd though is that Gino had made his comments reference no new helmets for ROTJ well before Brian Muir even showed off his helmet, so my guess is that if there was a run planned those people would have already known Gino's stance on the matter and didn't care so Gino pointing it out now would have had, I would imagine, very little impact to those involved.

Very good point...interesting!
 
So here we have 3 people, according to Gino, who betrayed a trust, a confidence and went and told him about this private planned run AND Gino isn't going to give them up? I don't know about any of you and what do we have like 6,000 members now, but I sure as hell don't want to ever deal with anyone who would be untrustworthy and dishonest. A man has to have his word or he is nothing at all. This is bigger than Brian and Gino and certainly bigger than any ROTJ claims by either of them. These 3 guys/girls could cause a lot of problems. Imagine one of you going with them with private info, pics, runs etc only to later find out they betrayed you or worse.

So I ask the staff of the RPF who are friends with Gino, to have him come forward publicly with the names of these people.

So, what exactly is that gonna prove lambo/darthkaro? So what if Gino has
people giving him information.. Is that all of a sudden against the rules of the
RPF or are you just trying to find out who the mole is in your croud? :thumbsdown
I think it's a good attempt to flip the situation to make it look like your so
concerned about the well being of the community, but like I've heard, you
guys have a big problem recently with information leaking out......
 
Last edited:
Holy hell...the words are there, but people just will not read them. GINO never said Brian fabricated anything. He did say he may have been given bad information.

Good cripes, let one person utter something that is not true and the mob will just run with it.
 
You contradict yourself btw...

First you said he provided information. Now you say I should ignore him. Can you please tell me what to do?

I think your misunderstanding me, but that's ok....

Take what gino says and either believe it or don't believe it. It's up to you.
I'm not saying to ignore him, but you have the ability to do so......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top