Thx for the pics
Cut down REAL sterling mags - YES
Production made/ screenused - Who knows!?
Without anybody sceenmatching this magazine to one of the E11s or identifying it as legit by looking at reference pics, it is nothing more than "a" cut down mag.
Reg. all the comments directed at you...
YOU claimed to have a StarWars blaster, built from "all original parts" based on a real deactivated C96!
Even without ANY insight or background knowledge about the actual screenused blasters, it should have been pretty obvious, that you are dealing with a REPLICA C96 ( and the Denix is a VERY obvious reproduction) and REPLICA parts (at least looking at the copyright information on the scope). This is the RPF, so you should have been "warned", that people here are very nitpicky :lol
Is it a nice blaster, yes...still, even after more accurate versions are available now.
Is it a collectible, esp. with Harrisons autograph...hell yes!
Is it what you claimed it to be...NO NO NO :cool
Cut down REAL sterling mags - YES
Production made/ screenused - Who knows!?
Without anybody sceenmatching this magazine to one of the E11s or identifying it as legit by looking at reference pics, it is nothing more than "a" cut down mag.
Reg. all the comments directed at you...
YOU claimed to have a StarWars blaster, built from "all original parts" based on a real deactivated C96!
Even without ANY insight or background knowledge about the actual screenused blasters, it should have been pretty obvious, that you are dealing with a REPLICA C96 ( and the Denix is a VERY obvious reproduction) and REPLICA parts (at least looking at the copyright information on the scope). This is the RPF, so you should have been "warned", that people here are very nitpicky :lol
Is it a nice blaster, yes...still, even after more accurate versions are available now.
Is it a collectible, esp. with Harrisons autograph...hell yes!
Is it what you claimed it to be...NO NO NO :cool