For me it comes down to this: the Star Wars films are the story of Luke and Anakin Skywalker. Everything else is peripheral. Films that don't follow that arc are just so much EU in my opinion. It'll be like those awful Dune sequels set like 3000 years in the future.
Now, I like Clone Wars and many SW comics, but they're just extra stuff. The only SW that counts in my mind is the Skywalker saga. Without that, it's just a pointless exercise in exploring other characters set in the same universe. Why bother?
I see this argument made a lot. I don't buy it.
The films BECAME about Anakin and Luke when the prequels came out. Prior to that, the films were about an overall ensemble story. Luke was "the hero" in one sense, but the films focus on multiple different characters and plotlines. In ANH, you've got the focus on Ben, the droids, Leia, Han, Vader (not Anakin at that point), Tarkin, etc. You've got an emphasis on the everyday people involved in the universe, rather than "All Jedi, All the Time."
ESB is even more of an ensemble piece. Sure, much of the film focuses on Luke and his training, but it also takes lots of time to develop Leia and Han. And that, by the way, was all WELL before Leia was known to be Luke's sister (don't even TRY telling me the Hoth kiss happened when they knew about THAT).
ROTJ again focuses both on the Luke/Vader/Emperor storyline, but ALSO on the whole shield generator/death star assault thing.
Again, before the PT, the OT was an ensemble story. And even if the protagonist was Luke, (A) he wasn't a Jedi until the very end of ROTJ, and (B) the whole trilogy spent a LOT of time with "regular folks." By contrast, the PT basically could give a crap about them. All Jedi, All the Time.
So is everyone taking Lucasfilm's flat out denial of this as some kind of subterfuge? Everyone is talking like this is still happening.
The article goes to pains to point out why "no" means "yes." Hell, for all we know, the article is based on "leaked" rumors that are leaked to gauge fan interest. >shrug<