HanSolo2187
Active Member
Very nice...
I've been watching ToD, as well, these past few nights. After being away from it for so long, it really stood out to me how much George and Steven tried to make Indy a "1930's James Bond" in the opening Shanghai sequence. I still love the sequence, but Indy seemed a bit out of character from what we knew from Raiders.Got a chance to see Temple of Doom tonight. Man, what a ride. I have always considered it the worst of the three (there are only three) Raiders films, but I enjoyed it so much. Unfortunately I missed Raiders by a week, but they’re about to start showing Last Crusade tomorrow, which I’m very excited for.
Yeah, watching Temple of Doom and Last Crusade in theaters, I did notice that a lot of the matte paintings and stuff like that weren’t quite as good in Temple of Doom as they were in Last CrusadeI've been watching ToD, as well, these past few nights. After being away from it for so long, it really stood out to me how much George and Steven tried to make Indy a "1930's James Bond" in the opening Shanghai sequence. I still love the sequence, but Indy seemed a bit out of character from what we knew from Raiders.
The use of matte paintings as backgrounds really stands out, as well. Some are pretty bad (the village-scape when they first arrive, the shot of Pankot Palace when they get to the bottom of the stairs/walkway).
It is sad how the Raiders series went from practical, real-world effects and stuntmen to green-screen and CGI for the later movies.My biggest problem with Last Crusade was the terrible blue screen work during the plane fight escaping the blimp. It just looked terrible, especially since they really put Ford in a bi-plane in the first one. You can really tell how fake the scene is in TLC.
It is sad how the Raiders series went from practical, real-world effects and stuntmen to green-screen and CGI for the later movies.
I can't find it on YouTube, but right after Raiders came out in '81, there was a "Making of" show on network TV that went behind how they did all of the stunts for the movie. It was awesome (at least, it was awesome as a 10-year old kid to watch). They showed how they tipped over the truck with Marion's basket in it using a telephone pole being shot straight into the ground on the under-side of the truck, Harrison being dragged behind the truck, and how they pulled off the effects for Belloq, Toht, and Dietrich after the Ark was opened.
We're having a batch of classic flicks playing in our area. Raiders, E.T., Jurassic Park, Jaws, Ghostbusters, etc.
Movie Showtimes Landmark Cinemas
I've seen Jaws and Blade Runner oodles of times on video, but not in the theater. A grand opportunity.That's a very solid list of movies.
I've always wanted to see Raiders and ET on the big screen:/
I've seen Jaws and Blade Runner oodles of times on video, but not in the theater. A grand opportunity.
And as much as I enjoy Raiders and E.T., I think I'll pass on them cause of the altering ie) color timing, CGI - ET & phones. Assuming they're showing those versions. Granted, Blade Runner has altering, but it would be an exception.
That's something I'd be looking forward to.Yes, Blade Runner would be a blast watch in theater!
The wide angle shots showing the future LA are my favorite parts of the film.
The last two times I saw ET in theaters it was the unaltered version. I doubt they'd ever show the altered version again. Even Spielberg acknowledges it was a mistake.I've seen Jaws and Blade Runner oodles of times on video, but not in the theater. A grand opportunity.
And as much as I enjoy Raiders and E.T., I think I'll pass on them cause of the altering ie) color timing, CGI - ET & phones. Assuming they're showing those versions. Granted, Blade Runner has altering, but it would be an exception.