DuneMuadDib
Sr Member
I'd like to be a fly on the wall in the meetings at EA/Bioware.
That'd be good, they're getting cupcakes from Retake on Friday.
Red, Blue, and Green cupcakes with an A, B, or C on each.
I'd like to be a fly on the wall in the meetings at EA/Bioware.
That'd be good, they're getting cupcakes from Retake on Friday.
Red, Blue, and Green cupcakes with an A, B, or C on each.
Wow. See, not really sure how helpful that is...
Oh there are threads devoted to it on the Bioware forums. After how much freaking time he spends talking to you in ME2 and he makes a brief cameo in ME3 without a word? There's a lot of discussion about it on BSN.
On BSN, yes. That's fine. I just find it fascinating that a lot of big articles don't even bother to bring him up unless it involves Shepard being blasted by his beam. It's like discussing the ending to The Empire Strikes Back without mentioning Darth Vader.
What, Jim Cameron writes almost completely unemotional, intellectual endings? Titanic, Avatar, The Abyss, Terminator, Terminator Two and Aliens called to say "nuh uh". :lol
Eh, to me this just rings true. It's a process mistake...right at the very end hubris set in and they monkeyed with the writing process that had produced such great results for two consecutive games and 90% of this one, too.
Dammit!
:cry
What, Jim Cameron writes almost completely unemotional, intellectual endings? Titanic, Avatar, The Abyss
Some of you will vehemently disagree, but this is a good, well-reasoned take:
Why Mass Effect 3's Ending Doesn't Need Changing (SPOILERS)
The way bioware was acting I think they truly had no idea that people wouldn't like the end, apparently they missed all the unhappy people coming out of the last Matrix movie.