You said you read the first draft of the shooting script. I can't say i believe that, but I can't be sure either. And scripts go through revision after revision after revision during shooting, so a lot of what u supposedly read probably isn't even in it any more. If the trailers don't convince u to want to see it, that's fine, that's how i myself judge whether or not i want to see a movie. I respect that.
So you don't think people are intelligent enough to know the difference between new and good when they see a movie? Idk about anyone else, but I'm insulted by that. And I'm not easily insulted.
Sorry, but it's true. First - take a look at how many people loved Episode 1 when it first came out - then as time cleared the fog from their head they realized it sucked - same goes for episode 2 and 3.
Well, no offense, but almost ^THIS^ entire post comes off as incredibly condescending. You could've taken everything you just said & condensed it down to:Sorry, but it's true. First - take a look at how many people loved Episode 1 when it first came out - then as time cleared the fog from their head they realized it sucked - same goes for episode 2 and 3. Now let's jump back on subject - Superman Returns - I was BLASTED by people for saying how terrible it was - then a few months later - everyone else was singing the same tune. I work all day with story - I know what goes into a good one and how committee or bad vision can create a horrible one. Hollywood usually bondos over story missteps buy pulling out it's magic bag of tricks -- which is filled with nothing but special effects. They smother over a story with eye candy when they know it's not that good - Bay has proven it's a formula that works. This is what makes new look good. It's like meeting a girl who is dressed in the latest fashion and another girl who knows how to speak French (or whatever). The girl in the latest fashion is only good on the surface (nine times out of ten) while the other girl has bettered herself from within - a harder thing to spot for the untrained. Now these special effects work in somewhat the same way. They cause the devoted movie goer to become confused - they love the effects and the story becomes less important -- for a short time. Once you start to forget about the effects (the new) the story works its way back to the front and it is only now you can truly judge the movie core. Alas, there are some who are lost forever but movies may not be all that important to them - or story is not all that important. There are people out there who hold Chips in higher order than say A Tale of Two Cities - I wouldn't want to hang out with them - but I've seen them.
Trust me my little friend (I've yet to miss a true classic).
As for the script - so far, everything I've seen in the trailers is in this screenplay. Scripts mostly change when the director is also a writer - we know Snyder is no writer - so he can't tell if what he's shooting is good or not, unless it's in front of a green screen where he can put some dandy explosions and stuff. I have the script and have had it for some time -- And you don't need to believe me - just believe me.
Now, I'm also a huge Superman fan, & I'm also cautiously optimistic about this film. But, I don't have a dog in this hunt. If I see it, & I think it's terrible, I'll say so. But that will just be my opinion, & there WILL be others who think it's the most epic thing they've ever seen. It's all personal preference."Listen up, little friend. I'm a professional & only I know what's good. You may think you know, but you don't. If I SAY something's not good, IT'S NOT GOOD. And this film is NOT good. End of discussion."
And ^THIS^ right here, very nearly makes your opinion, on this subject, moot for me. Batman Begins has been out for years now, & I love it now, just as much as I did the day I first saw it at the cinema. *shrugs*And the Nolan movies are boring
That's funny because its pretty much the same damn thing you said. I have no problem that people like things that don't... I'm pretty thorough in backing up my opinion.And that's the go-to rubbish for the haters to fall back on when they have no better excuse for people who have an opinion that differs from their own.
Well, no offense, but almost ^THIS^ entire post comes off as incredibly condescending. You could've taken everything you just said & condensed it down to:
Now, I'm also a huge Superman fan, & I'm also cautiously optimistic about this film. But, I don't have a dog in this hunt. If I see it, & I think it's terrible, I'll say so. But that will just be my opinion, & there WILL be others who think it's the most epic thing they've ever seen. It's all personal preference.
And ^THIS^ right here, very nearly makes your opinion, on this subject, moot for me. Batman Begins has been out for years now, & I love it now, just as much as I did the day I first saw it at the cinema. *shrugs*
One person's junk is another person's treasure. I'm just sayin'...
Well, I'm not about to get pulled into any arguments here, & to be honest I was hoping any response from you would would have been more than disdain & pompous sarcasm, but hey, we can't have everything we want, am I right? And to your question there: did you mean "Etiquette"? Cuz I AM here to stomp out ZOMG rampant grammar errors!!11@*THUNDERCRACK*Sorry if it's too long winded for you - my editor tells me to expand, reminding me some people don't understand brief and to the point. Hey, are you now patrolling the board looking to stomp out improper writing edicate and or rebuild on structure?
No, they are boring IN YOUR OPINION.And Nolan's films are boring...
And the Nolan movies are boring
And that's the go-to rubbish for the haters to fall back on when they have no better excuse for people who have an opinion that differs from their own.
I'm curious, how is the new 52 Supes portrayed in the new comic? To me, Supes has always been this really emotionless composed hero who only lost it when someone close to him was hurt. A bit boring if I'm honest.
Well, I'm not about to get pulled into any arguments here, & to be honest I was hoping any response from you would would have been more than disdain & pompous sarcasm, but hey, we can't have everything we want, am I right? And to your question there: did you mean "Etiquette"? Cuz I AM here to stomp out ZOMG rampant grammar errors!!11@*THUNDERCRACK*
No, they are boring IN YOUR OPINION.
:thumbsup
Nope. They might not be pretentious enough for your tastes, or hoity-toity enough, or artsy-fartsy enough, or some other made-up, rhymey word, but not boring. Those movies made FRAKLOADS of money, & movies that are considered "boring" by the vast majority of movie-going populace don't typically do that. I'd bet there are THOUSANDS of members on this site alone that will disagree with you.No they are boring.
No, I don't read it.And the typo was the joke - don't you read "Written By" magazine? It's on a shirt. Not the exact quote but close enough to get it.
I conjure there's no power in the 'verse that can stop that. Besides, it's unnecessary. Everyone gets it, YOU HATE NOLAN. Put it in your sig, brah.Looks like I'll need to go back to being long winded again.
That may be true, but it's not me. I've been grinning ever since I started reading your posts. Heck, Ima subscribe to your newsletter.I can see some are getting all hot and bothered -- so let's just do this -
BZZZZT. Following ^THIS^ advice, I never would've seen any of the Nolan Batman films, & would currently be suffering from an unknown, EXTREME entertainment deficit.You listen to me and agree with everything I post - including not going to see Man of Steel - and my mission will be complete - not only that but your life will be a better place - i PROMISE.
So did Nolan give you the boot out of his office or what Paul? :lol
YES. I couldn't believe it - he said my take was too --- get this -- exciting.
Oh well - who knows, maybe I'm wrong. I haven't liked anything since the Avengers
Paul, did this actually happen, or are you clownin'?
(We're at the point in the thread where I can't tell anymore.)
Wait ... you liked the Avengers?