RougeAvenger81
Well-Known Member
I think what everyone means by realistic is:
1. Batman got his Batmobile from an actual military prototype. He actually had to have a R&D guy to be able to make any gadgets, i.e. sourcing and funding etc.
2. There was no massive Gotham layout with giant statues larger than the actual buildings around them, i.e. Batman and Robin.
3. No Bane venom...I mean, really, only characters in DBZ are allowed to increase their size two-fold in a few seconds.
4. Ninjas...ninjas are real, making his training real.
5. And not necessarily "darker". I hate when that word gets tossed around and used to shoehorn fans into one ignorant sounding idea. Yes it was a helluva a lot darker than the fruit loops colored Batman and Robin. The villains weren't as outlandish as some of the others. Psychologically, most of Nolan's villains had motives that could be directly linked to something that made sense. They weren't villains for the sake of being villains. You had the mafia, the Chinese, the Ninjas, and the super villains. All jockeying for position at the top of the proverbial food chain.
BTW, My all time favorite villain was the Penguin from Batman Returns. He had a very grim story and his motives stemmed from this. Only villain, besides Catwoman, who had a decent MO...IMO
And just to stay OT...Henry Cavil has the right jawline for Supes
Thanks. You explained my point a lot better then I did by realistic. And yes, the term darker is a bit over used for those who are against this movie and the nolan films. Yes, the older comics of Supes and Batman were a lot different then Nolan's take and the take Snyder is using. However, Cavill admitted that MOS is taking a lot from the new 52 superman. A lot of the new 52 characters in the JL, Batman and Superman for sure have a grittier tone and a more serious outlook in their books. No DARKER, but definitly a more serious tone to their stories and characters.
By bringing those realistic elements into these films like the Commander stated above "real R and D personel, out sourcing equipment etc." it allows us as an audience to go, "Ok, I can see that, although never would happen I could see how in a super hero "real" universe it could happen. Superman is more difficult to do that with, but there are elements MOS seems to be doing with their filming to give it that "ok, it could happen" feel.
Some of the more negetive members here come off as though unless Superman is in bright spandex and smiling every second while fighting the villan they will be disappointed. The truth is if yo make a film in todays society exactly like the comics you lose a large audience because it will come off cartoonish in a way or unrelateable to those who don't otherwise follow the comics.
Again, just my opinion. Love the reboots, love the tone, can't wait for MOS to show us what they have done with the character.