YES. I couldn't believe it - he said my take was too --- get this -- exciting.
WTF?My thoughts exactly. JD, what I meant by staying true to Batman was keeping the core of what he was, yet creating a newand unique universe. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and mine simply is the new versions of Batman and MOS seem to feel more realistic based on their filming styles, similar/relateable problems (although amplified for a super-hero), and feel of the stories. Could/would their be a real life billionare that lurks in the night hunting crime, etc. No, today he would be found in a matter of a week. Same with MOS. Simply stating my opinion is some elements of Supes has to be changed to not only cater to the fanboy, but be able to relate to a modern audience who may no little about the character.
This is where the creators (like Nolan) use the comics as a base and go from their. The star trek reboot comment above being spot on. Most fans should be pleased to see a new universe or different side to a character they love without changing it all. And like many movies with such a vast back story or pool of stories to pick from, you appeal to the fanboy base by all the easter eggs and tip of the hat type things thrown into the movie.
Can't appease everyone. From my stand point, you can't simply redo 20-30 year old films. Times change. Keep the base stories, but you have to appeal to a larger fan base in todays age.
WTF?
First off, my statement was a direct reply to "Sadly, many fanboys* can't bring themselves to realize that. They tend to think that only they should be catered to when a movie like this gets made." Which basically took those words and reversed them. I'm not sure how it's right to say things one way, but not the other. It's called hypocrisy... and this thread is full of it.
Perhaps I've slipped up here or there - but, I think I've tried to stay pretty straight and true to my opinion... if someone has a differing opinion, I try to respect it and I try to back up my opinion with facts and reasoning. When someone dismisses my opinion as "rubbish" and labels me as a "hater" because they can't construct a solid argument - well, that shows how weak their skills of discussion are.
I have no problem with changes to adapt a character to film. For the most part, I love the Marvel films, I am looking forward to the new Trek probably moreso than any other film due to come out this year.
As I've said repeatedly - this doesn't look like Superman to me, it looks they've totally missed the mark. The really seem to be taking too much from the Nolan playbook - and like other folks in this thread, I didn't like the Nolan Batflicks (outside of the great casting and performances by Oldman and Ledger). But, if you think Nolan's Batman was true to the character, you don't know the character.
Again, there's nothing wrong with changing/evolving or adapting a character as both Batman and Superman have changed over their histories. I do feel at some point making changes becomes more about ego rather than trying to make a character/story better.
I also feel that there is nothing "more real" about the Nolan films. Again, darker does not mean it's more realistic... I don't get how so many people feel that way. This is a fantasy movie about a guy who dresses up as a bat/from another planet, a guy who gases the population with fear gas, another guys gets his face burned off, etc, etc... not a biopic.![]()
:love I'm guessing Superman will be at a severe disadvantage not having armor like his counterparts?This just keeps getting better and better. I'm so getting a pin with her emblem on it.
I keep hearing the argument that 'Snyder directed Watchmen so he sucks'. Nobody ever mentioned that he also directed Dawn of the Dead, IMO one of the best remakes around.
Besides, with Watchmen (and 300) he was deliberately going for a particular style and audience. He won't mess up Superman. Personally I can't wait for this movie to come out!
*for the record I have not seen Sucker Punch
For the Record, Dawn of the Dead was a mixed bag for alot of fans.
I, personally, loved it!
I have high hopes for this film. However, if it is indeed a snooze fest, Jet Beetle will be doing cartwheels...
Heck I'm still waiting for apologies for all the others I called -
Don't hold yer breath!
iircc there were a few who came back on the Prequels and said they were hoo doo-ed, momentary lapse of reason, etc etc and now saw the light that they were FRIGGIN HORRIBLE! :lol
The I'm pretty sure that the prequels have been hated since the day TPM arrived in theaters. There was no period that i could tell where people weren't sure.
I think Watchmen was great for what it was. Making that film was a no-win situation as the comic is just so in depth and rich with detail - would've made an amazing mini-series on HBO or something. But, Snyder tried very hard and for the most part made a terrific attempt at Watchmen. That said, yeah... I wish he would've kept the ending Alan Moore came up with.I keep hearing the argument that 'Snyder directed Watchmen so he sucks'. Nobody ever mentioned that he also directed Dawn of the Dead, IMO one of the best remakes around.
Besides, with Watchmen (and 300) he was deliberately going for a particular style and audience. He won't mess up Superman. Personally I can't wait for this movie to come out!
*for the record I have not seen Sucker Punch