JJ ABRAMS Enterprise

[Jet Beetle]

I don't know....

I'm anxious to hear the replies on this!

 

[micdavis]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Absolutely no regard for design continuity.

A crime.

Matt Jefferies is probably spinning in his grave.

But if I were to take it completely on it's own, it's pretty cool.

Certainly will be able to sell a bunch more toys. Which is of course the real motivation for not using a proper Enterprise.

 

[altername]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

C- Ok, not great.

 

[mverta]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Weak. Mis-proportioned. That's my initial, 30-second read.

_Mike

 

[dcarty]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

P.U.

 

[CessnaDriver]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Thankfully I have personally already written the film off as non-canon.

 

[KnightAsylum]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Looks good to me:thumbsup I love the look of the Nacelles:love
Cant' wait to see this flick!!!

Another thread here, with new article with possible spoilers!
http://www.therpf.com/showthread.php?t=52575

P.S. it is J.J. Abrams

 

[Clerval]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Of all of the hardware and tech designers who could have taken a shot at this, and those who ultimately did work on it... and the time and effort and scrutiny that... ah fuggit. What a piece of crap.

 

[ave4uevoli]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

why is the bridge set so far back on the engineering section? It's weird.

the blue deflector dish really is a little over the top..

and there's absolutely no need for blue lights coming out of the engine nacelles - especially for continuity sake.

 

[Carson Dyle]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Could have been worse (hell, it has been worse), but it should have been a helluva lot better.

Lopsided is right. Believe it or not, this angle is somewhat flattering.

 

[SVTStingRay]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

really want to give abrams a chance but im not liking the emo-enterprise

 

[AshGL1914]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Wow...that’s really, I don’t know, disheartening. I've been optimistic about this whole thing, considering Nimoy's participation in the film, but this is just so...I don't know, jarring. I had always thought that Gabe's Enterprise was too far from Mr. Jeffries design but now, after seeing THAT? It makes me long for something as close as Gabe's ship. I just...it just really makes me realize how far removed from STAR TREK this new film is going to be, and that sadly my generation has not even been considered as a demographic that matters to this production. RIP Star Trek...1964-1991. Thanks for the good times.

John Cooley
Born in 1971
Star Trek fan since 1975

 

[silverskyes402]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

IMO... Looks great, love the change!!!

 

[Kylash]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

ug, the engines arent even red

 

[streetjudge79]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Looks like the Enterprise to me, I have no problem with it. But of course the same bashers will tear it apart as they do anything that is shown for the first time....

 

[MattMunson]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

I think it looks great. Makes me want to see the film even more. Go JJ!

 

[CessnaDriver]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

USS Fuglyprise?

 

[Rotwang]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

I dunno, I do like the nacelles, but the engineering section is way too small compared to the saucer section, making it look out of proportion.

Maybe when we see more, it'll look better.

 

[SurferGeek]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

--
hodgepodge
--
hodge⋅podge
   /ˈhɒdʒˌpɒdʒ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [hoj-poj] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
a heterogeneous mixture; jumble.

:unsure

 

[wannab]

Re: JJ AMBRANS Enterprise

Maybe its a fish-eye lens effect, but it looks out of proportion. Need to see true straight on shots to make a final opinion.


Doug