Iron Man 3

Side note- being administered Extremis would cause him to not need the Arc reactor anymore since, in the comics, it completely rewrites his cellular structure.
I think you've mixed up some things a little. In the comic, Stark has had the arc (and the shrapnel in his chest) removed before he ever receives Extremis. The Extremis suit had it's own self contained power unit; Stark's body didn't "give off" power.

As far as the movie goes, my guess for that scene is either one or both of those things: getting the shrapnel (and thus the arc) removed, or being administered Extremis. The suits would still need a power source, and I imagine it would be a part of the suit like the War Machine, Iron Monger, and Whiplash suits.
 
Well we did see a couple appearances of armor that may have been unmanned. I imagine the 8-46 all look the same.
not necessarily looking all the same because this is a take on the Argonaut storyline. And one cool thing about that Argo story is one of the armor, the "Stealth armor", have the same reflective panels like the HeliCarrier, thus makes it invisible.
 
I think you've mixed up some things a little. In the comic, Stark has had the arc (and the shrapnel in his chest) removed before he ever receives Extremis. The Extremis suit had it's own self contained power unit; Stark's body didn't "give off" power.

As far as the movie goes, my guess for that scene is either one or both of those things: getting the shrapnel (and thus the arc) removed, or being administered Extremis. The suits would still need a power source, and I imagine it would be a part of the suit like the War Machine, Iron Monger, and Whiplash suits.

Yea I know the Arc and shrapnel had previously been removed. What I meant was, if the Extremis virus works exactly like the comic, then when "movie Tony" is given the last (presumably?) existing dose of Extremis it would simply "write" those parts out of his DNA when the metamorphosis completed. I'm not sure that's likely because the Arc is a huge symbol in the movies and plays quite a big part in each movie. I guess we'll see. I'm also not sure we'll see the whole "scar coccoon" thing after Extremis does it's work.

ATTENTION: there are Extremis Spoilers here!!!!!
Another thought, the scene in the trailer with Tony laying in the snow with the face plate removed lookin beat up could be BEFORE he's given Extremis. Remember in the comic Mallen kicks his ass and that prompts Mia to give him the last dose. Coldblood-7 and Firepower could be the replacement for Mallen.Now in the movie shot he looks perfectly healthy on the table so it doesnt look to be a life or death type thing where Extremis saves his life but still something to think about.
EDIT then again, could that shot be after the procedure is complete? Could explain why he looks so calm.
Kerr Avon- To answer how the suit would be powered without the Arc? Same as War Machine ;)

I'm hoping we'll see something with the 10Rings Being in The Mandarins employ the whole time.
 
i watched the trailer again today (so what, sue me). i saw a very recognizable glowing chest piece on happy hogan when hes laying all bloodied up on the ground. whats that about??
 
i watched the trailer again today (so what, sue me). i saw a very recognizable glowing chest piece on happy hogan when hes laying all bloodied up on the ground. whats that about??

I'm guessing some of these scenes are dream sequences
 
look what i found....

During the events of the “Dark Reign“, Norman Osborn created a new identity, the Iron Patriot (an amalgam of Captain America and Iron Man), to cement his standing as a hero. As the Iron Patriot, he utilized a version of Iron Man’s armor. The armor featured superhuman strength, enhanced durability via a pliable crystalline material with a molecular structure that can collimate into super-hard planes upon the application of an electrical field, flight, magnetic impact blasts, heat seeking missiles, miniaturized lasers, flamethrowers, and a communications system housed in his helmet which allowed him to interface with any U.S.-controlled satellite or computer network. While the original Iron Man armor utilized repulsor technology, Osborn’s design does not; Stark destroyed all but one repulsor, and stated that “Oz is too stupid” to make his own repulsor-based weapons system. The star shaped Uni Beam projector on his chest, because of its shape, also has a less powerful output than that of the original Iron Man model.


What does that mean?

Translation: Norman Osborn (famed Spider-Man baddie) is trying to establish himself as a hero, and in order to do so creates a less powerful version of Tony Stark’s Iron Man armor.

Now, obviously it won’t be Norman Osborn in the armor (Spider-Man is owned by Sony and Iron Man by Marvel), so who is the man in the suit? It is actor James Badge Dale, who is playing Eric Savin, who turns into the cyborg villain Coldblood in the comics. Now here’s where it gets complicated. Iron Patriot and Coldblood are not the same person. So why is Dale wearing the armor? My theory is that Iron Man 3 writer/director, Shane Black has altered the storyline a bit, having Eric Savin become Iron Patriot before he becomes Coldblood
 
i watched the trailer again today (so what, sue me). i saw a very recognizable glowing chest piece on happy hogan when hes laying all bloodied up on the ground. whats that about??

Someone mentinoed that previously. I've rewatched that scene a dozen times now. Cant see what you see. Just looks like a tie to me.
 
i watched the trailer again today (so what, sue me). i saw a very recognizable glowing chest piece on happy hogan when hes laying all bloodied up on the ground. whats that about??

looks like happy hogan in the suit...

92833903-iron-patriot.jpg
 
Someone mentinoed that previously. I've rewatched that scene a dozen times now. Cant see what you see. Just looks like a tie to me.

clearly a glowing blue chest piece under his shirt

also see iron patriot pic above, it looks just like happy

Happy-Hogan-is-in-trouble.jpg
 
look what i found....

During the events of the “Dark Reign“, Norman Osborn created a new identity, the Iron Patriot (an amalgam of Captain America and Iron Man), to cement his standing as a hero. As the Iron Patriot, he utilized a version of Iron Man’s armor. The armor featured superhuman strength, enhanced durability via a pliable crystalline material with a molecular structure that can collimate into super-hard planes upon the application of an electrical field, flight, magnetic impact blasts, heat seeking missiles, miniaturized lasers, flamethrowers, and a communications system housed in his helmet which allowed him to interface with any U.S.-controlled satellite or computer network. While the original Iron Man armor utilized repulsor technology, Osborn’s design does not; Stark destroyed all but one repulsor, and stated that “Oz is too stupid” to make his own repulsor-based weapons system. The star shaped Uni Beam projector on his chest, because of its shape, also has a less powerful output than that of the original Iron Man model.


What does that mean?

Translation: Norman Osborn (famed Spider-Man baddie) is trying to establish himself as a hero, and in order to do so creates a less powerful version of Tony Stark’s Iron Man armor.

Now, obviously it won’t be Norman Osborn in the armor (Spider-Man is owned by Sony and Iron Man by Marvel), so who is the man in the suit? It is actor James Badge Dale, who is playing Eric Savin, who turns into the cyborg villain Coldblood in the comics. Now here’s where it gets complicated. Iron Patriot and Coldblood are not the same person. So why is Dale wearing the armor? My theory is that Iron Man 3 writer/director, Shane Black has altered the storyline a bit, having Eric Savin become Iron Patriot before he becomes Coldblood

This has been known for quite some time regarding Norman Osborn... Except it isn't James Badge Dale, it's just a stuntman. If you look at the IP armor, it clearly has Rhodes name on it.

looks like happy hogan in the suit...

92833903-iron-patriot.jpg

Again, just a stuntman. Not Favreau
 
Now, obviously it won’t be Norman Osborn in the armor (Spider-Man is owned by Sony and Iron Man by Marvel), so who is the man in the suit? It is actor James Badge Dale, who is playing Eric Savin, who turns into the cyborg villain Coldblood in the comics. Now here’s where it gets complicated. Iron Patriot and Coldblood are not the same person. So why is Dale wearing the armor? My theory is that Iron Man 3 writer/director, Shane Black has altered the storyline a bit, having Eric Savin become Iron Patriot before he becomes Coldblood

Because it's not Iron Patriot. Both Mark Millar and Brian Bendis already stated that Marvel can't use the Iron Patriot. Also shots of this suit was already shot in a set location set up as A.I.M. So more likely that this storyline will have something to do with A.I.M. creating (a movie) Detroit Steel.
 
clearly a glowing blue chest piece under his shirt

also see iron patriot pic above, it looks just like happy

Happy-Hogan-is-in-trouble.jpg

This is Happy on the ground, that's not him in the suit. While Tony implanted Pepper with an arc to save her in the Invincible Iron Man series, I doubt they'd do something like this.

My take on the glow: if you see his left shoulder, there's the same blue glow, so my guess is both spots are blood that are being hit with a neon light's reflection or some such.
 
Because it's not Iron Patriot. Both Mark Millar and Brian Bendis already stated that Marvel can't use the Iron Patriot. Also shots of this suit was already shot in a set location set up as A.I.M. So more likely that this storyline will have something to do with A.I.M. creating (a movie) Detroit Steel.

Except that Disney trademarked Iron Patriot a couple of months ago... It's Iron Patriot.
 
I agree its for sure Iron Patriot. I'm pretty savvy on Marvel and their characters so I know about Detroit Steel, but that just doesnt fit in the movie. For the average non-comic reading audience, Iron Patriot sounds better/makes more sense than Detroit Steel.
 
What I just don't get is why Stark, if he has FORTY suits, doesn't just find some trustworthy people to pilot them and make an army of Iron Men. They could easily become peacekeepers across the world and shut down wars, stop genocidal militias, etc. If he's concerned about one going rogue, all he has to do is put in a kill switch with Jarvis to shut them down if they act up.
 
It says Rhodes on the damn suit... They trademarked "IRON PATRIOT"...

What are you guys having a hard time with?

Rhodey=Warmachine=IRON PATRIOT
 
It says Rhodes on the damn suit... They trademarked "IRON PATRIOT"...

What are you guys having a hard time with?

Rhodey=Warmachine=IRON PATRIOT

Very possible.

However, here's a thought: If Rhodey was able to commandeer one of Stark's suits and turn it into War Machine, how difficult would it be for someone else to commandeer Rhodey's Iron Patriot armor? Just because it says Rhodey's name on it doesn't mean it's Rhodey inside it. After all, I could have a car with FE ADMIN painted on the side, but just because it's on the road doesn't necessarily mean that I'm the one behind the wheel.
 
With the Air Force presentation along with the suit AND his name on the suit its Rhodey. I mean come on!...quack quack right
 
Back
Top