It would be nice to get a sample of this filament, maybe in white and run it through the printer comparing it to
a different brand, using the exact same settings and temperatures.
I wonder if it has a very rough texture to it on the spool, like Inlands "NEW FORMULA".
The new formula of Inland white was so rough, it gave the extruder a tough time pushing it through a Bowden tube
type printer.
If anyone gets this stuff, run the same stl. file using a few different filaments as a comparison exercise (such as new formula Inland White matte).
Is it worth the higher price?
In Matteforges description it said"
"We couldn't find anything available that would
visually disguise the layers that hinder FFF/FDM printing without the addition of post processing....."
Does it actually reduce the print lines (because of their new formula) or just hide them better because there is less light reflection (matte finish)?
I would love to be able to get a free sample to test any of these claims:
- Matte finish, low gloss
- High impact resistance
- Good flexural strength
- Same print settings as typical PLA
- Great layer and bed adhesion
- Made from 100% renewable and natural raw materials
- Almost no odor
- No warping (low shrinkage, 0.3%)
- Available in 1.75 mm or 2.85 mm
- +/- 0.05mm diameter tolerance
This is an image from their web page. I guess it bends, but I see print lines?
.