firesprite
Master Member
You're equating a character being well written and well acted with being a character you have to be invested in.
When a well written and well acted character is removed from the story, for the sake of the story, why must I feel the rest of the story is diminished?
The story is not called "Ned", or "Frey", or "Tywin". It's called game of thrones. The only "character" they could take out middle of things that would diminish the story, is the concept of someone sitting on the throne
No one is saying you HAVE to be invested in anything, but if people are, why do you find it surprising or hard to understand? You don't empathize with a throne. You empathize with someone who struggles to achieve something, whether it's simple survival or taking said throne.