I had the same thought. My working presumption is to take it at face value and presume what happened in-universe are the things incorporating the changes Jen wanted. I still wonder where Matt Murdoch came from! He literally just dropped from the sky, as far as I could tell!I'm having a little trouble figuring out what "really" happened during the climax after she got them to re-write it.
Anyway, the show was really fun!
First question -- I'm going to presume that he either didn't use it or was unable to do so.Phelps IS HulkKing, and HAD collected her blood, but ended up not using it?
Blonski HAS been appearing as Abomination, but really only attended (and allowed the meeting to be booked at his retreat) for the money, as he claimed?
In the first episode, Bruce said that their ability to metabolize gamma radiation instead of... you know... dying horribly, was a literal billion-to-one shot. Doesn't mean their blood isn't dangerous, but it wouldn't create another Hulk as it did when Todd originally injected himself. Them making it work was a plot hole. Jenn's revised ending eliminates the plot hole; presumably they couldn't figure out a way to synthesize it in order to get it to work on Todd.Yes, but what things?
Phelps IS HulkKing, and HAD collected her blood, but ended up not using it?
Blonski HAS been appearing as Abomination, but really only attended (and allowed the meeting to be booked at his retreat) for the money, as he claimed?
Was Tatania there?
Jenn interrupted the meeting and called the cops, everyone stood down, end of scene?
That was a big issue for me. The gimmick made the resolution of the plot superfluous, which in my eyes, is bad writing.I'm having a little trouble figuring out what "really" happened during the climax after she got them to re-write it.
Not watching the video, thanks. I think it's very telling that the headline behind him in the still specifies that the finale is telling "toxic Marvel trolls" to go **** themselves, and this guy apparently decided that applied to him and got offended...The Former Network Executive has just posted this.
But the problem is that Disney has applied the term to everyone who didn't like it, including those that had legit criticisms about it's stories and characters (like they have with the fandoms when they have released unfavorable Star Wars and Marvel related materials in the past few years). However, if you're not interested in the video, that's okay. That's your decision on what to watch.Not watching the video, thanks. I think it's very telling that the headline behind him in the still specifies that the finale is telling "toxic Marvel trolls" to go **** themselves, and this guy apparently decided that applied to him and got offended...
I mean... I hear what you're saying, but it doesn't match up with what I've seen, so, I suppose it's a matter of 'your mileage may vary'.But the problem is that Disney has applied the term to everyone who didn't like it, including those that had legit criticisms about it's stories and characters (like they have with the fandoms when they have released unfavorable Star Wars and Marvel related materials in the past few years). However, if you're not interested in the video, that's okay. That's your decision on what to watch.
I don't know, I actually thought it looked really bad at times, specifically the shot where she's walking outdoors across the "real world" studio, just before she finds the writers. The walking animation looked stilted and stiff, and there were some jerky moments between She-Hulk and the background. The other characters also had similar problems, like they looked a bit too CGI, and didn't quite match the environment.Just an aside, but did anyone else note how much better the She-Hulk CGI was for the finale?
SSB
The Former Network Executive has just posted this.
Except the video is about an article where the writers and cast of the show were interviewed and quoted.Sensationalistic videos like that are difficult to watch because the "I'm angry and going to insult everything" vibe gets old after 30 seconds regardless of accuracy of content. Sure it will get views and resonate with those who already agree but push those who don't farther away often in just the video thumbnail or description (as we saw here). So yay for clicks from those who agree, nay for changing anyone's POV. Delivery is everything.
The end of Episode 8 presented an interesting set of questions at that point in She-Hulk’s narrative. Would the MCU contend with what it’s like for women, even when they’re heroes, to live in fear of doing anything that could be considered out of line? Would it comment on what it means to be a hero as a woman when Jen can’t shamelessly rage the way Bruce can? Would it give her a chance to finally accept her own internal rage at the entire situation, thus finally accepting her new existence as She-Hulk?
No, but apparently they’ll introduce her to the AI machine that supposedly controls the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Because that’s totally the better option here.
I watched the series, the video and read the Variety article. I entirely understood his points.Except the video is about an article where the writers and cast of the show were interviewed and quoted.
They (show creators) are now telling you, "you were scammed."
The folks who said, "things weren't right about the show," were right.
and the writers are so woke-pathologic that they call those who pointed out the poor-quality that they claim to have INTENTIONALLY baked into the show, "toxic."
I watched the series, the video and read the Variety article. I entirely understood his points.
Not to be a broken record my point is simple, those who agree will click because they agree, those who don't agree are not going to get swayed by an angry bitter old man swearing at a camera no matter how true his words. Many won't even watch the video because of the evident tone. It's impossible to convince others to change their POV by yelling at them, being obnoxious, rude and snarky. It turns people off and makes them not even listen to the message. I mean at one point the guy basically says "**** you if my swearing offends you."
So awesome former network executive, get your clicks, do your thing but don't expect it to make a shred of a difference or to evoke any kind of change in anything.