1138sw
Sr Member
Oh yeah great theme!Anybody else hear the Jerry Goldsmith theme every time you look at this model?![]()
Oh yeah great theme!Anybody else hear the Jerry Goldsmith theme every time you look at this model?![]()
Yeah I agree. I don’t see any reason why they won’t make their goal. The enthusiasm seems of the charts for this one…plus Canada is involved in the sales. And the people who missed out on the TOS want the refit badly…no missing this one this time around.This time they probably won't keep reducing the crowd funds initial goal. So for example... if it calls for 5k to be made to support the fund. That's what it as to be or it won't be made. So no lower like they did last time.
Anybody else hear the Jerry Goldsmith theme every time you look at this model?![]()
I can't think of another time a film has dwelled so much on a prop with those long reveal shots. I guess the production knew the fans REALLY loved the a Enterprise. I would have happily watched 2 hours of shots flying around that model.
100% for sure!Of course.
As the years go by, I think the Enterprise was really the star of the movie.
How about 2001? They had some pretty long beauty shots of the ships. The docking scene is one of my all time favorite scenes in movie history. Blade runner too does some pretty long beauty shots. But the Motion Picture dry dock scene is by far my most favorite of all time!I can't think of another time a film has dwelled so much on a prop with those long reveal shots. I guess the production knew the fans REALLY loved the a Enterprise. I would have happily watched 2 hours of shots flying around that model.
I’d actually love to hear more about this . I’ve had the art asylum versions since the early 2000’s and I vaguely seem to remember that they may have used digital scans employed by a vfx company that was redoing some of the effects for the TMP DVD. That vfx company had unprecedented access to the filming model before it went up for auction .I wonder if the reason they had the nacelles a bit low was in moving away from Kimble plans—Art Asylum’s choice.
Case in point
Enterprise Evolution from TOS to TMP
Plus the slight changes for the 1701A (a small change to the secondary hull deflector grid and the changed markings). Do include the “ten-forward” like area we saw fleshed out at Fan Art.www.trekbbs.com
Different cord lengths would be needed depending on where a buyer would be able to plug it in !Man, they are super insistent about that cord not being included (cord not included).
I'm happy that they managed to get a partial hangar bay in there, even if it's not the whole hangar/cargo bay structure.
Someone suggested that on the TOMY + webpage. Hopefully they’ll see it and listen.I wonder if they could drop a false perspective image in there, or whether that would just look naff? (apologies to JNordgren42 for stealing a pic from his amazing build)
They have indicated no major changes or add ons. If they started adding on all of our wants it would never get to production.Someone suggested that on the TOMY + webpage. Hopefully they’ll see it and listen.
Very true but some changes have been addressed as making the Enterprise level on the stand…we all hated the weird downward angle or at least the majority…and better light diffusion in the nacelles which they said will address. I would like to see a false extension in the hangar deck. If not no biggie but it doesn’t hurt to ask.They have indicated no major changes or add ons. If they started adding on all of our wants it would never get to production.
I posted your pic…JNordgren42…hope you don’t mind…on the TOMY + page as a consideration for the TOMY Team. So far getting some very very positive reactions. Thank you for the pic. I hope TOMY considers it. I hope the fans can convince them.I wonder if they could drop a false perspective image in there, or whether that would just look naff? (apologies to JNordgren42 for stealing a pic from his amazing build)