tgreco
Sr Member
actually, I don't think you're as off as you think you are
if you look at the trench in the photos of the original model, it's obvious that the photos were shot from a bantage point beneath the model
with the help of the flash in the area that would be darkest (the overhang) it makes the trench on the original look smaller
(in the second photo of the original, the trench is almost a straight line, were as in your photo the DS appears to have a slight smiley face)
in your photos, you're shooting at a vantage point that is pointing down, making the shadows in the trench appear darker
if you try laying on the floor, and shoot some pics pointing up to match the vantage points the original photos were shot at, I think you'll find that you're closer then you think
it also looks like there is a black line painted on the top and bottom of the inside of the trench, which espcially in the second photo of the real DS makes the highlight off the lip on the bottom almost disappear, making it appear thinner then it actually is
if you look at the trench in the photos of the original model, it's obvious that the photos were shot from a bantage point beneath the model
with the help of the flash in the area that would be darkest (the overhang) it makes the trench on the original look smaller
(in the second photo of the original, the trench is almost a straight line, were as in your photo the DS appears to have a slight smiley face)
in your photos, you're shooting at a vantage point that is pointing down, making the shadows in the trench appear darker
if you try laying on the floor, and shoot some pics pointing up to match the vantage points the original photos were shot at, I think you'll find that you're closer then you think
it also looks like there is a black line painted on the top and bottom of the inside of the trench, which espcially in the second photo of the real DS makes the highlight off the lip on the bottom almost disappear, making it appear thinner then it actually is
Last edited: