Blade Runner 2049
- Thread starter ghostryder
- Start date
rodneyfaile
Sr Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Very nice Blade Runner anime trailler made from various clips:
Very nice Blade Runner anime trailler made from various clips:
Last edited by a moderator:
Nth
Sr Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
I agree with everything you said. Although even a two second Deckard cameo would make me happy, he even has a tiny cameo in the old Blade Runner PC game as an easter egg.
I agree with everything you said. Although even a two second Deckard cameo would make me happy, he even has a tiny cameo in the old Blade Runner PC game as an easter egg.
ghostryder
Legendary Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/08/25/ridley-scott-the-martian-blade-runner-prometheus-sequels/
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/08/25/ridley-scott-the-martian-blade-runner-prometheus-sequels/
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
That's nice and all but: Make Prometheus 2 already!
That's nice and all but: Make Prometheus 2 already!
Curmudgeon
Well-Known Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Honestly I'd rather have a Prometheus sequel than a Blade Runner sequel. Or another movie set in the BR universe but not directly connected to the first film
Honestly I'd rather have a Prometheus sequel than a Blade Runner sequel. Or another movie set in the BR universe but not directly connected to the first film
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
I always thought they would make the sequel for bladerunner about decker and Rachel off in the mountains and another group of skin jobs is sent to kill them or bring them back to tyrell corp as the company was bought out by a competitor after tyrells death. and there planning on using there bodys for research. imagine 89 year old billionaires buying the technology to down load your mind into a younger replicant. even a four year life span would be exceptable. you just keep downloading to a new body.
I always thought they would make the sequel for bladerunner about decker and Rachel off in the mountains and another group of skin jobs is sent to kill them or bring them back to tyrell corp as the company was bought out by a competitor after tyrells death. and there planning on using there bodys for research. imagine 89 year old billionaires buying the technology to down load your mind into a younger replicant. even a four year life span would be exceptable. you just keep downloading to a new body.
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Sounding like they are going a poor direction for me as I hoped against, Geezer Deckard is not something I want to see nor want to know. His story ended just fine in 1982.
Sounding like they are going a poor direction for me as I hoped against, Geezer Deckard is not something I want to see nor want to know. His story ended just fine in 1982.
Jedi2016
Sr Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
That could be epic. There were shades of BR here and there in their Tron soundtrack.
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Ridley Scott Won’t Direct BLADE RUNNER 2 | Badass Digest
After wrapping up the movie The Martian I was really hoping he would direct this sequel instead of the Prometheus sequel, though no word on that either.
Ridley Scott Won’t Direct BLADE RUNNER 2 | Badass Digest
After wrapping up the movie The Martian I was really hoping he would direct this sequel instead of the Prometheus sequel, though no word on that either.
cayman shen
Master Member
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Oh god please let this sequel die. Haven't they **** on enough lovely things?
Oh god please let this sequel die. Haven't they **** on enough lovely things?
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
The purpose of any sequel is to propagate story.
What makes Blade Runner special has less to do with the story and more to do with the presentation.
Therefore a sequel isn't likely going to enhance anything about Blade Runner, as far as I'm concerned.
And with Ridley Scott so drawn into CGI (e.g. Prometheus) I feel as if any treatment is going to naturally be more CGI than practical effects.
This is what I fear. I have yet to find any CGI film that has the kinetic magic that the best practical and in-camera effects can conjure.
And Blade Runner is the quintessential example of this.
I'm wary of this prospect.
The purpose of any sequel is to propagate story.
What makes Blade Runner special has less to do with the story and more to do with the presentation.
Therefore a sequel isn't likely going to enhance anything about Blade Runner, as far as I'm concerned.
And with Ridley Scott so drawn into CGI (e.g. Prometheus) I feel as if any treatment is going to naturally be more CGI than practical effects.
This is what I fear. I have yet to find any CGI film that has the kinetic magic that the best practical and in-camera effects can conjure.
And Blade Runner is the quintessential example of this.
I'm wary of this prospect.
Re: Blade Runner Sequel
Well maybe with Scott gone if that is the case, can I hope someone will try to go for something new just set in that verse and not a direct sequel again?
No question that this future film noir environment can be home to many engaging tales not centering on the characters/topics of the first film.
I would think creative types would chomp at the bit to tell a private detective story there.
And go CRTs or go home! Keep it "real" man. Don't friggin' update the future!
Well maybe with Scott gone if that is the case, can I hope someone will try to go for something new just set in that verse and not a direct sequel again?
No question that this future film noir environment can be home to many engaging tales not centering on the characters/topics of the first film.
I would think creative types would chomp at the bit to tell a private detective story there.
And go CRTs or go home! Keep it "real" man. Don't friggin' update the future!
Similar threads
