Re: what's the point of multiple rebel transports in the battle of Endor? Did vader q
Meanwhile, I'd been ruminating on the capital ship thing. Then
Mara Jade's Father posted this screen shot from the season two teaser over in the Rebels thread:
...And that made a lightbulb go off. In the Prequels we saw freghters and cargo haulers converted into warships by the CIS. The Republic only had corvettes and frigates. The
Acclamator landing craft were part of the purpose-built materiel for the clone army. The outbreak of war allowed Palpatine to have larger ships built, and we got the
Venators. After he got emergency powers, I imagine he wasted no time in making "more and bigger" a priority. We know from the Rebels-ANH-ESB throughline that there was a decade or so of refinement to
that model of Star Destroyer. And we know from ESB there were variations even when they appear at first glance to be identical. It makes sense to me that, for convenience of construction and maintenance, all the shipyards are working with the same parts suppliers to build ships to the same general template.
In the US Navy you don't see a bunch of widely divergent carrier classes. You see one (with minor variations between vessels) that then gets supplanted by another that looks very similar at first glance.
Meanwhile, the Rebels would likely only still have whatever was around and easily acquirable pre-wars. Except for the couple big cruisers, but since the EU has been set aside, we don't know that they're made by the Mon Cal, or that they were converted passenger liners. For all we know, they could have been purpose-built in secret by the Sullustans.
So yeah. I don't have any problem with the Empire having only a haldful of ship types and general uniformity. Contrariwise, I wish they'd taken time to get more of a rag-bag assemblage in the Rebel fleet, rather than a bunch of corvettes and Nebulon-B's (and transports, as this thread was started to address), with a couple big cruisers.
--Jonah