NakedMoleRat
Master Member
What I don’t need is a 20 something Lex going up against a 20 something Superman. Let Lex be in his 50’s, there no shame in that.
I don't know about a 50 something Lex, but he should definitely be in 30s or 40s to be credibly established as the Lex we know and to be believable as Lex too. The only way a 2o something Lex could work is if they change his backstory and make him initially not a villain, ambitious and maybe with somewhat flexible morals but not an all and out bad guy yet. But Clark/Supes does something that disrupts one of Lex's plans, disastrously, which causes Lex to turn to the dark side, so to speak. That might work, but I'd prefer the classic already established Lex though. He would definitely resonate with today's audience who tend to see any and every big time CEO as some sort of evil villain to hated and reviled.What I don’t need is a 20 something Lex going up against a 20 something Superman. Let Lex be in his 50’s, there no shame in that.
But Clark/Supes does something that disrupts one of Lex's plans, disastrously, which causes Lex to turn to the dark side, so to speak.
You know, there's one villain I don;t think they have done in the movies yet that Giancarlo Esposito's gravitas and persona would fit even better than Lex Luthor...I honestly have a little fatigue with Lex as the villain in another Superman movie and kinda wish they would choose someone else. But I get why he's an attractive villain if they are building a large, shared movie universe.
Nicholas Hoult will be 34 soon (born December 7th, 1989). I think the idea that he's younger stems from people recognizing him from his prior roles, like the X-Men movies or Warm Bodies, which were filmed a decade ago. That, and generally he has a youthful appearance. So the concern may be less his age and more the perception of his age.I don't know about a 50 something Lex, but he should definitely be in 30s or 40s to be credibly established as the Lex we know and to be believable as Lex too. The only way a 2o something Lex could work is if they change his backstory and make him initially not a villain, ambitious and maybe with somewhat flexible morals but not an all and out bad guy yet. But Clark/Supes does something that disrupts one of Lex's plans, disastrously, which causes Lex to turn to the dark side, so to speak. That might work, but I'd prefer the classic already established Lex though. He would definitely resonate with today's audience who tend to see any and every big time CEO as some sort of evil villain to hated and reviled.
Yeah, I'm not sure there's a "right" age but I do think that there's a "good" age and I feel that's about 10 - 15 years older than Sups/Clark. Old enough to be believable as an ultrawealthy businessman and the head of a business empire. Cast Lex too young and it, to me, strains credibility that he's much of a super villain, certainly not if they portray him as classic Lex who's an evil Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk and already the head of a global multi-billion business that's like Apple, Disney, Amazon, Tesla, and Google all combined. Even in his 30s would be a stretch, but more believable as long as Lexcorp is scaled down and is not so large that it's into nearly everything, yet.I don't know if there's a "right" age for Luthor in a Superman story, as a lot of it comes from personal preference, based on our own history with the character.
I agree. I didn't care for Jessie Eisenberg's version of Luthor. A big part was how he was written, but I also didn't care for his performance.Yeah, I'm not sure there's a "right" age but I do think that there's a "good" age and I feel that's about 10 - 15 years older than Sups/Clark. Old enough to be believable as an ultrawealthy businessman and the head of a business empire. Cast Lex too young and it, to me, strains credibility that he's much of a super villain, certainly not if they portray him as classic Lex who's an evil Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk and already the head of a global multi-billion business that's like Apple, Disney, Amazon, Tesla, and Google all combined. Even in his 30s would be a stretch, but more believable as long as Lexcorp is scaled down and is not so large that it's into nearly everything, yet.
I guess the real motivation of Luthor has been that he desires power, and Superman becomes his obsession not only because he thwarts Luthor's plans, but he also possesses incredible physical power that Luthor does not. He hates Superman not only for what he does with his power, but also for simply having that power.
I'm ok with a younger Lex, especially if they paint him as a bit of a nepo-baby trying to get out of his father's shadow.Yeah, I'm not sure there's a "right" age but I do think that there's a "good" age and I feel that's about 10 - 15 years older than Sups/Clark. Old enough to be believable as an ultrawealthy businessman and the head of a business empire. Cast Lex too young and it, to me, strains credibility that he's much of a super villain, certainly not if they portray him as classic Lex who's an evil Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk and already the head of a global multi-billion business that's like Apple, Disney, Amazon, Tesla, and Google all combined. Even in his 30s would be a stretch, but more believable as long as Lexcorp is scaled down and is not so large that it's into nearly everything, yet.
I guess the real motivation of Luthor has been that he desires power, and Superman becomes his obsession not only because he thwarts Luthor's plans, but he also possesses incredible physical power that Luthor does not. He hates Superman not only for what he does with his power, but also for simply having that power.
That would work, I just wouldn't want to see a 20 something Lex that's already as established as classic Lex is, to me that's just not believable. I could potentially see him as a sort of Zuckerberg like character that heads up some sort of tech start up that got huge, fast, but even that's a bit of a stretch for me and it would have to be one company with a singular focus and not a multi-national conglomerate.I'm ok with a younger Lex, especially if they paint him as a bit of a nepo-baby trying to get out of his father's shadow.
It’ll never happen.That would work, I just wouldn't want to see a 20 something Lex that's already as established as classic Lex is, to me that's just not believable. I could potentially see him as a sort of Zuckerberg like character that heads up some sort of tech start up that got huge, fast, but even that's a bit of a stretch for me and it would have to be one company with a singular focus and not a multi-national conglomerate.
It’ll never happen.
Insert snarky Millennial with a “rare disease” that makes him lose his hair and becomes extremely intelligent who hates Superman because…reasons!
That’s what we’ll get. No motivation, no reason, just jealous revenge for no reason.
Insert snarky Millennial
That was a little snarky!Hey us elder millennials are 40 now, thank you very much.
I know there are many examples, but this one jumped to mind...