So you acknowledge it is no where in the film. You choose to have a specific interpretation and then become obstinant and obtsuse when those actually in charge of crafting the canon provide an actual backstory. That's dumb. And GL himself created a much more expansive version of the Rebellion in ROTJ because he had the $ and technology to do it, so he did with no explanation. One wasn't needed, it was completely superfulous to the story he was telling. And since you are also throwing a fit over electro staffs blocking lightsabers I can only assume you are pedantic as well.
My "interpretation" is largely influenced by the movies. I agree an explanation wasn't needed. I always thought it was pretty self-explanatory what was going on but I guess you guys are proving me wrong and need someone to make up something for you.
Its only dumb if you decide every little detail has to be explained. Thats just how you feel. Star Wars was never about spending time doing that. Heck, the story started off bringing the audience right into the middle of a galactic civil war. Except for the crawl there was very little explanation of everything that was going on. You just took it at face value and went along with the story. It wasn't until the EU came along that started attaching stories to every little background character and explaining why certain details happened the way they did.
I'm actually just the opposite. I don't want every little detail explained and find a lot of the explanations we're getting to be pretty silly.
@
Wolfsburg you clearly have a major beef with the story group and Dave Filloni based on your posts. I don't know if you are disgruntled EU fan or what but Dave Filloni is a huge asset to Star Wars and has created some wonderful content most fans are really enjoying. And I appreciate the Story Group for cleaning house and giving us finally a cohesive narrative.
I'm not a fan of the EU stories per se, and am frankly not someone who
wants to have everything explained, but a lot of the longstanding EU background explanations for some of this stuff is far better than what Filoni and the Story Group have come up with so far, in my opinion. It made more sense to me anyways. That said, the fast majority of my "interpretations" have been from the movies themselves. I know he has some fanboys here that will unquestioningly swallow whatever he feeds them but Filoni is a very mixed bag and nothing terribly special. He has moments of brilliance but generally all he's done is muddled waters that should've been left alone. He seems to have difficulty creating narratives that don't interfere with existing canon. He takes something that is perfectly clear and immutable, from my point of view based on what we see or even don't see in the movies, and leans far too heavily on the "true...from a certain point of view" angle to try to milk content for story material. I am sure he could say that X-wings are pooped out by celestial unicorns and some of you would gobble it up like he's some sort of SW savior. That's fine but I will continue to have my opinions on the matter.
No, dumb is thinking that intentions are canon.
Lucas had a lot of intentions as he continued to develop his saga and he changed them as he got new ideas or decided which way made the best story. But he never locked himself into settling for ideas just because they were first. For example. Lucas had Splinter of the Minds Eye created to be a low budget sequel during the filming Star Wars (A New Hope) fearing that he may have to fund it himself. But since A New Hope was a success, he could do another big budget film. So by your line of reasoning, since Splinter was intended to be the sequel to A New Hope, that intention makes it the canon sequel and The Empire Strikes Back is stepping all over the canon.
Intentions are not canon no matter who says or thinks it. It may give us insight to what the story developers were thinking and what other aspects of the Star Wars universe might be like, but until they insert it into canon material such as a movie, TV show, novel, or comic, it is not canon.
Well then, I would far rather respect what GL intended back then, even if it wasn't spelled out, like some of you apparently need.
Thats kind of the stereotypical fanboy thing, isn't it? They come up with this idea in their head of how things should be and then cling to it as if its gospel. Then, when the story doesn't pan out that way, its the creator\storytellers fault. They're bad.
Well, the movies are "gospel" as far as I'm concerned and my "idea" of how things should be are from simply watching the movies themselves. It really isn't anything more than that. I'm a guy that much prefers the KISS explanation of things. Less is more and all that. Yavin 4 is THE rebel base in ANH, Luke was the very last of the Jedi in ROTJ, etc...That sort of thing. That's much more in keeping with the mythological nature of the saga.
I really get the impression in Jedi that it is a newly formed alliance with the calimari. And considering their capital ships, those guys bring a lot to the table.
I agree. That's my impression too and it's a very logical one, in my opinion. Considering we'd never seen the Mon Cals or their cruisers before ROTJ, it's pretty obvious that is what we're supposed to infer, but some here need to have everything spelled out and have guys like Dave Filoni formulate some convoluted or ill conceived tale of what "really" went on. That's fine but it just surprises me how much they apparently need him.