Armageddon was tons of fun.
I too really enjoyed it but I wouldn't call it an awesome movie
Armageddon was tons of fun.
Some of them really can't do without spandex...like spiderman. But the ones that can....Spandex is goofy. It was goofy in the 1930's when they wore those costumes as a way to draw muscles without the folds of normal clothes and it's still goofy.
You saw a completely different Bale Batman than I did. I didn't crazy, I saw someone disaffected - someone with nothing behind his eyes at all (and not in a good way) - I really got the feeling that Bale didn't want to be there.Something just really clicked with me: Bale has a decidedly Jack Nicholson-esq quality about him in that even when he's being pleasant, you can see the bugnuts crazy in his eyes. That makes him a perfect candidate to be both Bruce and Batman. The guy just exudes unhinged. Affleck is so likable...he looks amazing in the suit, and I like him as an actor, but Bale's barely suppressed lunacy is going to be a tough act to follow. The Keaton to Kilmer transition had the exact same issue. Keaton plays crazy very well. Kilmer didn't have that glimmer of madness. Of course, the movie sucked too so that didn't help :lol
Keaton was miscast.Something just really clicked with me: Bale has a decidedly Jack Nicholson-esq quality about him in that even when he's being pleasant, you can see the bugnuts crazy in his eyes. That makes him a perfect candidate to be both Bruce and Batman. The guy just exudes unhinged. Affleck is so likable...he looks amazing in the suit, and I like him as an actor, but Bale's barely suppressed lunacy is going to be a tough act to follow. The Keaton to Kilmer transition had the exact same issue. Keaton plays crazy very well. Kilmer didn't have that glimmer of madness. Of course, the movie sucked too so that didn't help :lol
The '89 film was a good departure from the TV show but I was already expecting that. All I can say was that in 1989 in the midst of all the hype I wanted to see the batman that was in my imagination - which was more like Nolan than Burton.I was never sure with Keaton as Batman,but I will say that I just got the '89 Batman on DVD and after all these years I sat through and watched the whole thing-I really ain't sure I could do that with the Nolan films,even begins has moments I hit fast forward.....
Now granted that movie,and both Keaton and Nicholson,were basically a more serious take on the old TV show (go watch it and compare,really it was like watching West and Romero without the TV censorship) but it was fun and to this day is an enjoyable flick to sit back and see.
So maybe this Superman/Batman thing could be good,I'll give it a chance.
DC still sucks though,and Superman is still stupid.
The problem with superman is that he's too OP.
What the heck does OP mean?
And that's the exact reason Kryptonite was introduced into the comic books in *1949--a hero that's completely invulnerable and impervious to everything is boring because there's never any sense that he/she is at risk.:lol That's L33T speak for Over Powered
Ah, ok. And L33T is...?:lol That's L33T speak for Over Powered
Ah, ok. And L33T is...?
LEET short for Elite aka "1337"
Shhh...teh 1337 speak isn't for N003S...:lol