Things you've always wondered about in sci-fi movies

The idea that everything has a name. Like every field, every forest, every valley, every creek, every hill, etc. is named after something or someone. I grew up in the country and we had all of these. None of them had names. Sure, roads and rivers had names, but that was about it. It was just the field, the forest, the valley, the creek, the hill, etc.
As a kid I get it, because as kids we're not truly conscious of ownership or trespassing, or other such boundaries that we have. When we're kids. Hickory Creek is just "the creek," Walker's Field is just "the field," Higginbotham Woods is just "the woods," and Moraine Valley was just "the valley." They still had names, and people who took care of them, but kids just aren't conscious of them.
 
As a kid I get it, because as kids we're not truly conscious of ownership or trespassing, or other such boundaries that we have. When we're kids. Hickory Creek is just "the creek," Walker's Field is just "the field," Higginbotham Woods is just "the woods," and Moraine Valley was just "the valley." They still had names, and people who took care of them, but kids just aren't conscious of them.
...or much else...
 
On a guided tour, yes.

But more of a "Tim the Enchanter".

Well, there are SOME who call me "Tim"

monty python and the holy grail GIF
 
What I want to know: in UK/Europe, is there always a "Gandalf" in any hiking tour who has to announce the name of the land/area/place as soon as it comes into view? ;)
When Fire in the Sky was showing at our local theatre everyone was yelling during the movie "That's my grandma's house.", "I'm the third guy in the search party, with the beanie.", announcing every scene, every hill, every house. A bridge scene came up and in the utter silence I yell "Got a ticket for 70 in a 50 on that bridge."
 
A time traveller going into the past, never returns to their own time/space reality. They may go back, not interfere at all with the timeline and then return to their present, but it’s to a new present created by their arrival in the past. Their friends and colleagues may look the same, but they will not be the actual people they left, rather the nu universe versions. Likewise, the time travellers original colleagues in the place they left, are Left to wonder what happened to the traveller, as they never return to the originating universe. Experiment classed as a failure.

yes, I do need a life!

Doc Brown Omg GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy
 
How about all the time machines in fiction that also move geographically as well as back through time?
Time travel is odd enough for fiction, but even movies we have been told are adhering to the 'rules' of time travel do this as well. Bruce Willis in "12 monkeys" winds up during WW1 but in a trench in France? That never made any sense!
Think of it this way--this planet, Earth, is in constant motion. It orbits around our Sun, and revolves on it's own axis. So if a "time machine" didn't take this into consideration, when you appeared, say, 100 years in the past, the odds are that Earth would be in a different location and you would be left floating in empty space. Traveling through time alone would likely get you killed unless your particular time machine could also protect you from the environment when you arrived long enough for you to immediately return to your starting point if you needed to.
 
But, think about how the Time machine works in HG Well's "The Time Machine". It stays in the same place and time moves past it, so it moves along with the Earth, just out of phase so no one can see or interact with it. Other time machines could work similarly, it's just not as obvious that's what they are doing, since their travel time is faster.
 
Think of it this way--this planet, Earth, is in constant motion. It orbits around our Sun, and revolves on it's own axis. So if a "time machine" didn't take this into consideration, when you appeared, say, 100 years in the past, the odds are that Earth would be in a different location and you would be left floating in empty space. Traveling through time alone would likely get you killed unless your particular time machine could also protect you from the environment when you arrived long enough for you to immediately return to your starting point if you needed to.
Watch this!
 
and the solar system is moving through the Galaxy and the galaxy is moving through the universe. Would one have to have mapped the universe to time travel?
 
Think of it this way--this planet, Earth, is in constant motion. It orbits around our Sun, and revolves on it's own axis. So if a "time machine" didn't take this into consideration, when you appeared, say, 100 years in the past, the odds are that Earth would be in a different location and you would be left floating in empty space. Traveling through time alone would likely get you killed unless your particular time machine could also protect you from the environment when you arrived long enough for you to immediately return to your starting point if you needed to.
Not only revolving but also falling! So the horizontal + the vertical are also into the equation:unsure::lol:
 
Back
Top